Google Answers Logo
View Question
 
Q: Hotelling's Lemma ( Answered 5 out of 5 stars,   0 Comments )
Question  
Subject: Hotelling's Lemma
Category: Business and Money > Economics
Asked by: dime365-ga
List Price: $10.00
Posted: 02 Feb 2004 04:24 PST
Expires: 03 Mar 2004 04:24 PST
Question ID: 302719
Consider the problem of maximizing profit (pi symbol, but i'll use &)  
&=py-wl  subject to the production function y=l^a  (l to the power of
alpha, alpha is an element of (0,1)).  Derive the profit function and
confirm that Hotelling?s lemma is satisfied.  What happens if a=1 ?
(alpha is equal to 1)

thanks
Answer  
Subject: Re: Hotelling's Lemma
Answered By: elmarto-ga on 02 Feb 2004 10:58 PST
Rated:5 out of 5 stars
 
Hi dime365!
First we'll check that Hotelling's Lemma is satisfied. You can find
Hotelling's Lemma at the following page:

The Profit Function
http://cepa.newschool.edu/het/essays/product/profit.htm
(search for "Hotelling" inside the page)

We have:

& = p*y - w*l

so

(d&/dp) = 1*y = y , and
(d&/dw) = -1*l = -l

Therefore Hotelling's Lemma is satisfied.

Finding the profit function can be done by simply replacing y=l^a into
the profit formula py-wl. Therefore we have that the profit function
is:

& = p*l^a - w*l

If "a" belongs to (0,1) (not including either 0 or 1) then we can use
calculus in order to find the "l" that maximizes profits. This is
because when "a" belongs to (0,1), the profit function is concave; so
if we take the derivative of the profit function with respect to "l"
and equate it to 0, we'll get the "l" that maximizes profits. However,
if a=1, this is no longer valid, because the profit function is not
concave in this case. When a=1, we have:

& = p*l - w*l
& = (p-w)*l

We have thus 3 possible cases:

1) p > w : In this case, (p-w)>0, therefore the firm must hire
infinite "l", because as l rises, so do profits.

2) p < w : In this case, (p-w)<0, therefore the firm must hire 0 "l".
Any positive quantity of l will cause the firm to have negative
profits. Clearly, the firm manager would prefer to produce nothing.

3) p = w : In this case, (p-w)=0, therefore the firm is indifferent
among any quantity of "l". It doesn't matter how much "l" the firm
hires, the profits will always be 0.


Google search strategy
"hotelling's lemma"
://www.google.com.ar/search?q=%22hotelling%27s+lemma%22&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&hl=es&meta=


I hope this helps! If you have any doubts regarding my answer, please
don't hesitate to request clarification. Otherwise I await your rating
and final comments.

Best wishes!
elmarto
dime365-ga rated this answer:5 out of 5 stars
Elmarto always provides excellent answers!  Thanks!

Comments  
There are no comments at this time.

Important Disclaimer: Answers and comments provided on Google Answers are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Google does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. Please read carefully the Google Answers Terms of Service.

If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by emailing us at answers-support@google.com with the question ID listed above. Thank you.
Search Google Answers for
Google Answers  


Google Home - Answers FAQ - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy