|
|
Subject:
Accessing updates on old news stories
Category: Reference, Education and News > Current Events Asked by: johnfrommelbourne-ga List Price: $5.00 |
Posted:
23 Apr 2002 04:41 PDT
Expires: 30 Apr 2002 04:41 PDT Question ID: 3084 |
How do I find news or rather updates on former big splash stories that no longer appear in the newspaper but still interest me and I am sure thousands of others. For instance a year or two back a major story broke of woman who had eight babies of which seven were apparently healthy and well by time story dropped off news. I always wondered if they lived or not after that first week of constant updates evry day that suddenly stopped without a single word from anyone. |
|
Subject:
Re: Accessing updates on old news stories
Answered By: katwoman-ga on 23 Apr 2002 16:54 PDT Rated: |
Hi johnfrommelbourne, Unfortunately, there's not a one-stop shop on the web for old news stories. The approach you should take depends on the nature of the story. If it was a story that made national news, such as this one, I'd suggest trying the larger news sites such as CNN, The Washington Post or The New York Times. (Although it's free, registration is required for The New York Times site.) Otherwise, your best bet would be to go to the local site newspaper, TV or radio that relates to the story. You can also try portal sites such as MSN and Yahoo!. These sites have news sections that include past and present coverage of a continuing story. Whether you use a national, local or portal news site, sometimes the hard part is finding the information you want. You can approach your search in two ways: 1) Use the right search term -- or simply use a variety of search terms. In this case, a search of "texas octuplets" on Yahoo!, yields much better results than "houston octuplets" 2) Look for the in-depth coverage section on these web sites. The catch here is that each media organization labels this section differently. Here are the areas or terms you should try: special report specials full coverage continuing coverage in-depth If you're lucky, these areas will be plainly labeled on the front page of the site, but in some cases, you'll have find them areas by going to a site map or site index, or by searching on the terms that I've listed above. For example, in the menu on the left side of CNN's site, there's a section called "In-Depth" http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/ If you go there, you'll find expanded coverage from the last several years on a variety of topics If you go to the Washington Post's site, you'll have to click into each category (Nation, World, Metro, etc.) for a list of special reports. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/nation/specials/ One thing to watch for on newspaper sites is the archive section because you may have to pay for that service. Here's a list of other sites that offer on-going coverage: ABC News http://more.abcnews.go.com/onair/abcnewsspecials/SpecialsIndex.html MSNBC News http://www.msnbc.com/news/continuingcoverage_front.asp?0dm=N205N Yahoo! News http://dailynews.yahoo.com/fc/ Here are a couple of sites to try if you're looking for local news sites: Newspapers US and Worldwide http://www.refdesk.com/paper.html Most-linked-to local news sites http://newslink.org/toptypes.html Hope this helps, Katwoman |
johnfrommelbourne-ga
rated this answer:
I would have given five stars as answer was terrific and more than expected. However on seeing some other responses that were more comprehensive, especially answer to question on "Where can I buy a burqua", I can see that that resaeracher put even more time and effort into question. In that event the five stars seemed not enough if my researcher also recieved five stars so if the latter can only get five then my researcher would have to go one degree less which on your rating system is four. I think the point of what I am saying is that like with hotel ratings around the world there is not enough flexibility in five only points to effectively seperate very goog from good from excellentand then perhaps outstanding( alreday leaving aside average, poor and very poor). To solve the problem I think you need half stars between each full star,(if you know what I mean). In any case thanks to KATWOMAN for terrific assistance provided very cheaply |
|
Subject:
Re: Accessing updates on old news stories
From: jeremagne-ga on 23 Apr 2002 07:04 PDT |
Some news websites allow you to search past content, so for stories like this which only happened a few years ago you can usually find out more recent information by searching specific news sites. The trick with searching is creating an accurate search term, but in this case you're in luck because eight babies are 'octuplets', which is a good word to search for (better than, say, '8 babies' or 'multiple birth', because it will return fewer stories which are usually more relevant). Searching cnn.com for 'octuplet' returned 30 matches, most of which were about the octuplets born in Houston in 1998. The most recent one was after the seven surviving babies' first birthday: http://www.cnn.com/1999/US/12/20/octuplets/index.html General web searches can help too. For example, searching Google for 'octuplets houston' returned 512 matches; the top one was written only a few months ago and summarises the babies' lives to date: http://www.twinstuff.com/houoctup.htm The Google search is probably a good place to start if you're looking for general information. Searching a specific news site is good to see how the story was presented at the time. Hope this helps! |
Subject:
Re: Accessing updates on old news stories
From: ostr-ga on 23 Apr 2002 09:53 PDT |
try to see via the Wayback Machine (www.archive.org) the stories main news web sites were covering back then ... |
Subject:
Re: Accessing updates on old news stories
From: think-ga on 24 Apr 2002 06:21 PDT |
From earlier comment: "However on seeing some other responses that were more comprehensive, especially answer to question on "Where can I buy a burqua", I can see that that resaeracher put even more time and effort into question." That question paid $25, while yours paid $5. |
Subject:
Re: Accessing updates on old news stories
From: johnfrommelbourne-ga on 28 Apr 2002 08:09 PDT |
A bit late perhaps but another commenter has suggested I was a bit hard on researcher in only allotting four stars which on refection and the point she makes I can see I was not quite fair. Therefore Katwoman if ever you open this question again please accept an extra point in spirit at least and good luck again with your new career in research and question answering; although I note on various search engine news sites that the e xperts are predicting your career will be shortlived as this GOOGLE venture will turn out a failure!!!!!! Gee I hope not as i think it is fantastic |
If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by emailing us at answers-support@google.com with the question ID listed above. Thank you. |
Search Google Answers for |
Google Home - Answers FAQ - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy |