|
|
Subject:
Which is worse "Sweet and Low" or "Equal"
Category: Health > Fitness and Nutrition Asked by: dopamine-ga List Price: $2.00 |
Posted:
23 Jun 2002 10:53 PDT
Expires: 23 Jun 2003 10:53 PDT Question ID: 31953 |
Is the aspartame scare an urban myth or are there valid reasons why it should be avoided? What are the proven dangers/side-effects of saccharin? What does the most current academic research indicate? Any info that is unbias and accredited is appreciated. |
|
Subject:
Re: Which is worse "Sweet and Low" or "Equal"
Answered By: 8ball-ga on 23 Jun 2002 18:44 PDT Rated: |
Is the aspartame scare an urban myth or are there valid reasons why it should be avoided? This seems to be two questions: Is the aspartame scare an urban myth? and are there valid reasons why it should be avoided? I would say that the answer to both of these questions is yes. For any of the questions you have asked, however, there is going to be wild disagreement throughout. My own personal experience is that the stuff is completely benign. Missy-ga clearly feels very strongly that it is not. I will say that the link she has given does not strike me as authoritative. There is tons of stuff at the FDA, but I think this one page is a good summary of what you will find: http://www.cfsan.fda.gov/~dms/qa-adf9.html It gives the FDA position that aspartame is generally safe as well as the few instances in which it is known to cause problems. This should answer the second question directly. There are clearly some reasons why one might avoid aspartame. However, given that your question is about the aspartame scare, I assume pointing you to the FDAs website is insufficient for suggesting the scare is a myth. I am guessing that you will also find any pointer to a page at a soda company to be insufficient. One site that you might find sufficient is: http://web.mit.edu/newsoffice/tt/1998/sep16/aspartame.html This page states, Even daily large doses of the high-intensity sweetener aspartame, also known as NutraSweet, had no adverse effect on study subjects' health and well-being. The best non-FDA analysis of the aspartame scare that I have seen is at About.com. About.com has a great deal on aspartame. I think the best place to start is: http://urbanlegends.about.com/library/blasp.htm?terms=Aspartame+Dangers This discusses an e-mail that went around in 1998 about aspartame toxicity. The third page has several links to authoritative pages that affirm aspartame is benign for most people. (This is where I found the MIT link.) As to the question of: What are the proven dangers/side-effects of saccharin? this too is controversial. There has been concern that saccharin causes bladder cancer: http://cis.nci.nih.gov/fact/3_19.htm However, much of this concern appears to be unfounded for the small amounts of saccharin that people actually ingest. Though once again, one can find web sites, articles, opinions, etc. that vary wildly. Here is some information form saccharin.org: =) http://www.saccharin.org/backgrounder.html The government has now removed saccharin from its list of potential carcinogens as well: http://nutrition.about.com/library/news/bl051500a.htm?terms=saccharin+%22side+effects%22 I think the bottom line here is not to lose too much sleep over any of this. If you have problems then by all means avoid the artificial stuff. Personally, I worry much more about the fact I still do not own a ski helmet than the fact I drink diet soda. ;) Hope this helps. 8ball-ga |
dopamine-ga
rated this answer:
excellent, thanks! |
|
Subject:
Re: Which is worse "Sweet and Low" or "Equal"
From: missy-ga on 23 Jun 2002 12:48 PDT |
You can find a listing of Aspartame studies here: http://www.dorway.com/peerrev.html Me, I avoid the stuff like the plague. It causes violent nausea, and migraines that force me to stay in a completely dark, completely silent room - either until they pass, or Sweet Merciful Death comes to take me away. missy "I'll take sugar, thanks" -ga |
Subject:
Re: Which is worse "Sweet and Low" or "Equal"
From: mydogrex-ga on 10 Jul 2002 08:02 PDT |
Unfortunately in science, the results often benefit the study sponsor. Try stevia, instead. This is a method paper for detecting aspartame: Aspartame + chymotrypsin --> methanol methanol + alcohol oxidase --> formaldehyde (BTW this happens in our bodies) from Analyst, 1997, 122 (5), 487 - 490. More papers supporting methanol, formaldehdyde breakdown products Cheng YD, Lin SY. Isothermal Fourier transform infrared microspectrosopic studies on the stability kinetics of solid-state intramolecular cyclization of aspartame sweetener. J Agric Food Chem. 2000 Mar;48(3):631-5. PMID: 10725126 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] Trocho C, Pardo R, Rafecas I, Virgili J, Remesar X, Fernandez-Lopez JA, Alemany M. Formaldehyde derived from dietary aspartame binds to tissue components in vivo. Life Sci. 1998;63(5):337-49. PMID: 9714421 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] Here are citations on saccharin 1: Schoeffner DJ, Thorgeirsson UP. Susceptibility of nonhuman primates to carcinogens of human relevance. In Vivo. 2000 Jan-Feb;14(1):149-56. Review. PMID: 10757072 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] 2: Whysner J, Williams GM. Saccharin mechanistic data and risk assessment: urine composition, enhanced cell proliferation, and tumor promotion. Pharmacol Ther. 1996;71(1-2):225-52. Review. PMID: 8910956 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] 3: Cohen SM. Role of cell proliferation in regenerative and neoplastic disease. Toxicol Lett. 1995 Dec;82-83:15-21. Review. PMID: 8597044 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] 4: Cohen SM. Cell proliferation in the bladder and implications for cancer risk assessment. Toxicology. 1995 Sep 1;102(1-2):149-59. Review. PMID: 7482550 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] 5: Cohen SM. Human relevance of animal carcinogenicity studies. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 1995 Feb;21(1):75-80; discussion 81-6. Review. PMID: 7784639 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] 6: Elcock M, Morgan RW. Update on artificial sweeteners and bladder cancer. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 1993 Feb;17(1):35-43. PMID: 8441827 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] 7: Chappel CI. A review and biological risk assessment of sodium saccharin. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 1992 Jun;15(3):253-70. Review. PMID: 1509119 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] |
If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by emailing us at answers-support@google.com with the question ID listed above. Thank you. |
Search Google Answers for |
Google Home - Answers FAQ - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy |