Request for Question Clarification by
aht-ga
on
08 Apr 2004 18:51 PDT
wonkywabbit-ga:
A challenge in providing you links to websites that provide a 'period
reference' to these terms, is the reality that the World Wide Web
itself was born on a single, experimental server in 1991, and it was
not until 1994 that it began its exponential growth into what we now
know. As a result, unless someone has taken it upon themselves to
create a modern history site discussing the evolution of technical
terms in the early '90s, you will not have the definitive 'period
reference' that you are seeking; and even if such a site exists, the
content will be purely the opinion of the site operators.
It may be possible to provide you with references to published
documents/papers from those time frames where the terms appear; again,
the definitions will be purely the opinion of the authors.
From my own background (professional engineering and business
management), I can tell you that the term "module" is extremely
general, and has not changed in basic meaning since at least the 70's.
The meaning has expanded to be applicable to everything from physical
assemblies (the original meaning) to include virtual assemblies (such
as software 'modules).
I can also tell you that the term 'central processing unit' was first
coined in 1969 to describe Intel's successful attempt at a single-chip
assembly that could provide computing functions on its own. The
acronym CPU has been properly used to describe this class of chip ever
since.
Finally, I can tell you that even in 1994, the term 'serial bus'
referred to the use of serial (ie. sequential) communications over a
multi-tapped bus or loop. The protocols involved have varied from the
70's through to the present, but the concept has always been the same.
See http://standards.ieee.org/micro/1394overview.html for an example.
I still remember setting up RS-422/485 serial communications buses in
the late 80's/early 90's, when the protocols themselves were already
widely adopted for industrial communications applications (for when
these standards were introduced, see
http://www.bb-elec.com/tech_articles/current_loop_app_note/introduction.asp
).
Generally, what I am trying to communicate here is that these terms
were general terms that were basically assumed to be widely understood
within the technical circles that used them at the time.
In light of this, can you tell us what you would accept as credible
websites/definitions? Does it have to be from an 'official'
organization/company, or would you accept private-individual websites
where someone has posted their own knowledge (much as I have just done
above)?
Regards,
aht-ga
Google Answers Researcher