|
|
Subject:
Digital pictures with clean white backgrounds.
Category: Miscellaneous Asked by: 23v-ga List Price: $10.00 |
Posted:
25 Jun 2002 05:55 PDT
Expires: 25 Jul 2002 05:55 PDT Question ID: 32859 |
Hi, My wife runs a small shop selling bath and body products (soaps etc.) She needs to take a load of pictures for her on-line store but would like them on a white background. The question here is what is the best technique for for taking pictures so that they are on a white background and require the least amount of editing in Photoshop. She used to be a pro. Graphics Designer so is well versed in Photoshop but would like to do the least amound of work possible. In previous tests we have not been able to set up the shots so there is suitable light without washout or too much shadow. Any help is appreciated. |
|
Subject:
Re: Digital pictures with clean white backgrounds.
Answered By: morris-ga on 25 Jun 2002 06:43 PDT Rated: |
23v-ga, I've had hundreds of photographs published as step-by-step book illustrations, all of which were shot against white backgrounds. While you can eliminate shadows with enough lights and reflectors, I've found the simplest method to be this: Shoot outside with the product placed on a white sheet or white poster board (available from office stores). Choose an overcast day (eliminates shadows) or work in the shadows of a large structure, like a house, in the early morning or late afternoon. You didn't mention whether you are shooting a digital camera or 35mm, but the main problem of shooting against a white background is that it fools the automatic exposure mechanism, and causes meters to read incorrectly (this causes the wash-out). Basically, all light meters operate by averaging light to the middle of the photographic gray scale (18% reflectance. For example, if you take a photograph of a solid white wall, without over-riding the automatic exposure system, the photo will come out gray. The same thing happens if you photograph a black wall. You compensate by adjusting the f-stop or the shutter speed, which in the case of shooting against white, means letting in far more light than the metering system suggests (usually 3 stops more). You can do this by increasing the exposure time or the aperture. You can approach this scientifically, by buying a photo gray card (18% reflectance) from any decent photography store and using it to calibrate the settings whenever you shoot, or you can just experiment with "overexposing" to get the proper whites and contrast. Some excellent links explaining the photographic zone system and how light meters work (or don't work) follows: A simplified zone system for making good exposures by Norman Koren http://www.normankoren.com/zonesystem.html Photoworkshops - Introduction to 18% Middle Tone. http://photoworkshops.biz/lesson2.htm and from Active Image Manipulation for Deskop Publishing http://www.aim-dtp.net/aim/calibration/middle_gray/ I'd also like to suggest an excellent book by Peter Laytin, "Creative Camera Control." I hope this answers your question, and let me repeat the key point. Google search terms used: 18% reflectance |
23v-ga
rated this answer:
Sorry for not getting back sooner, I was in a car crash and have been in hospital. Thanks for the answer it was great and the comments wonderful too. |
|
Subject:
Re: Digital pictures with clean white backgrounds.
From: larre-ga on 25 Jun 2002 07:46 PDT |
As a designer who makes photo objects frequently, let me explain my own method. Morris' technique is "the" way to go when you wish to use the images, as is, without much manipulation in a graphics program. If you're planning graphics editing, there are a few minor differences which can make the editing job easier. I examine each object and decide what color is not present. I have a number of sheets of matte colored paper, gift wrap actually, which I can use as the background. I select a sheet that is a complete contrast to the edges of the object. I use a tri-fold "reflector", just a piece of cardboard which I place behind the object. I cover the reflector with another sheet of matching color paper. I use a pair of inexpensive gooseneck lamps with 100 watt bulbs on dimmer switches to light my subjects. I prefer to eliminate shadows as much as possible, adding them uniformly in Photoshop, instead. Since I also use a digital camera, as you've indicated in the title of your question, I know how easy it is to take shots from several angles, try various exposures or settings, or move the object between shots to obtain the best angles. I use a tabletop tripod, generally. When I bring the images into Photoshop, I use Corel's KnockOut 2 Plug-In to quickly produce a photo object on a transparent background. Since I've chosen a contrasting background to begin with, it's quite a simple process for this sophisticated filter to eliminate the original background. I bring the image back into Photoshop, placing it on its own layer. I've found it very effective to occasionally use an empty white pedestal as a background, sized to match the object, when I want a little more of a display for an object. I use the Photoshop lighting effects filter to add just a bit of directional light, then create a complimentary shadow if desired. I save the project in .psd format with all the layers, then a flattened copy as a jpg at 600 dpi. I use a photo quality printer to print the image on glossy photo paper. KnockOut Review and Tutorial About.com Graphics Software http://graphicssoft.about.com/library/extra/blko_000607.htm Corel KnockOut 2 - Procreate http://www.procreate.com/go/knockout/ - larre - |
If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by emailing us at answers-support@google.com with the question ID listed above. Thank you. |
Search Google Answers for |
Google Home - Answers FAQ - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy |