![]() |
|
![]() | ||
|
Subject:
mathematical methods for physicists
Category: Science Asked by: guggilla-ga List Price: $2.00 |
Posted:
14 Apr 2004 10:13 PDT
Expires: 14 May 2004 10:13 PDT Question ID: 330138 |
i want the proof for unit vector(r)=magnitude of(r) . the directional vector(r0) | |
| |
| |
| |
|
![]() | ||
|
There is no answer at this time. |
![]() | ||
|
Subject:
Re: mathematical methods for physicists
From: joshuahorowitz-ga on 19 Apr 2004 12:43 PDT |
Are you asking to prove that the unit vector in the direction of v is equal to v divided by the magnitude of v (unit(v)=v/mag(v))? I don't know what that dot can mean, since magnitude is a scalar, not a vector. But if you do mean what I referred to, you can just use the fact that mag(a*v)=a*mag(v) for any scalar "a" and vector "v". This means that mag(v/mag(v))=(1/mag(v))*mag(v)=1, so v/mag(v) is a unit vector. Also, v/mag(v) is a positive scalar multiple of v, so it's in the same direction. Any unit vector in the same direction as v is v's unique unit vector. That's a proof. But it might not be of what you want. |
Subject:
Re: mathematical methods for physicists
From: la_daniel-ga on 19 Apr 2004 13:01 PDT |
From Arfken and Weber 5th ed p123 eq2.43 A position vector r may be written R=R'r=R'(x^2+y^2+z^2)^(1/2) =X'x+Yy'+Z'z =X'rsin(theta)cos(phi) + Y'rsin(theta)sin(phi)+Z'rcos(theta) where I have substituted ' for the ^ above the vectors i.e. r with a ^ in the book is r' here, and I have substituted capital letters for bold letters i.e. a bold r in the book is R here. The first two lines of this do not require spherical coordinates. Line 1. For any vector R we can express it as a unit vector in that direction (denoted R') and its length r. Hence the R=R'r part. In cartesian coordinates (double application of pythagorean theorem) r=(x^2+y^2+z^2)^(1/2) (i presume you know how to derive that since your question is about spherical coordinates). Line 2. You can also write any position vector R as X+Y+Z where X, Y, Z are vectors in the x, y, z directions only. In that case form the 1st paragrpah about line 1 you can write X=X'x Y=Y'y Z=Z'z thus line 2 Line 3. Line 3 is derived from line 2 with the observation that x=rsin(theta)cos(phi) y=rsin(theta)sin(phi) z=rcos(theta) which is equations 2.36 from the book. If you want a proof for eq 2.36 then I can provide that. Regards |
If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by emailing us at answers-support@google.com with the question ID listed above. Thank you. |
Search Google Answers for |
Google Home - Answers FAQ - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy |