|
|
Subject:
Relative importance of good communication skills
Category: Business and Money > Employment Asked by: alexvic-ga List Price: $20.00 |
Posted:
24 Apr 2004 13:25 PDT
Expires: 25 Apr 2004 14:41 PDT Question ID: 335550 |
Please help me find studies comparing good communication skills to other skills. I want to know how much higher communication skills rate among employers. I need NUMERICAL data, such as "90% of employers value good communication skills more than any other skill (other skills scored so-and-so)" and "85% of all jobs in the USA require good communication skills, 45% require excellent communication skills, and only 15% do not mention communication skills as a requirement." I need five to ten studies highlighting the value of good business communication skills. It would be nice if one of them would show correlation between bad communication skills and layoffs. Thank you!!! All data is needed prior to April 25, 10:00 AM EST. Otherwise, disregard this post, please. |
|
There is no answer at this time. |
|
Subject:
Re: Relative importance of good communication skills
From: redhoss-ga on 24 Apr 2004 17:22 PDT |
From personal experience I would say that communication skills are no longer important anywhere anytime. Spelling, grammar, and proper English have been replaced by video games and press #2 if you want to continue in Spanish. |
Subject:
Re: Relative importance of good communication skills
From: neilzero-ga on 24 Apr 2004 18:23 PDT |
I mostly disagree with redhoss, but I will conceed that good communications skills in Spanish instead of English will help you get good employment in a very few situations. I suspect the numbers you want will be mostly educated guesses as most employers do not give tests to evaluate communications skills, but instead expect the personel department and section heads to make a subjective evaluation of communications skills. Try this logic on for size: The purpose of a corporation is to increase the wealth of the share holders. Essentially all activity is aimed at this purpose either directly or indirectly. With rare exceptions, only employees with good communications skills enhance the wealth of the share holders and chief exexcitives. Medium communications skills may result in financial break even, but bad communications skills typically cost the share holders dearly. Why would anyone want to hire or retain a person with poor communications skills, even if they do other things very well? Typically you can compensate for poor spelling and grammer by saying/writing the important parts of the communication in two different ways. If the two seem to conflict, the recipient will typically ask for clarification. If you say it one way, but wrong, costly errors can result. Also other employes will try to bypass you if they are frequently only 99% sure they understand what you are saying after several attempts at clarification. In some activities, being correct 99% of the time is grounds for separation from your employment. Neil |
Subject:
Re: Relative importance of good communication skills
From: alexvic-ga on 24 Apr 2004 19:55 PDT |
Ha-ha, redhoss, a hilarious comment. And Neil, thank you for your suggestions and thoughts! Alex |
If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by emailing us at answers-support@google.com with the question ID listed above. Thank you. |
Search Google Answers for |
Google Home - Answers FAQ - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy |