|
|
Subject:
hypotheses in anthropology
Category: Science Asked by: jess-ga List Price: $10.00 |
Posted:
26 Jun 2002 13:40 PDT
Expires: 26 Jul 2002 13:40 PDT Question ID: 33717 |
What hypotheses have been posited to explain the evolution of the following hominid characteristics and behaviors: bipedal locomotion, provisioning, food sharing, home base, cooperative social behavior, sexual division of labor, reduced birth spacing, sequestered ovulation, pair bonding/monogamy, brain expansion, opportunistic and deterministic tool-use and hunting behavior |
|
Subject:
Re: hypotheses in anthropology
Answered By: hedgie-ga on 03 Jul 2002 09:55 PDT |
Great question, jess As mother said in her comment, the answer would have to combine several fields of science in a balanced and acessible maner - a tall order. It just so happens that I am just finishing reading a book which accomplished just that. Here is a review http://dannyreviews.com/h/Guns_Germs_Steel.html Another review http://www.wwnorton.com/catalog/spring99/gunsgerms.htm and ordering info: http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0393317552/104-2725714-8351968 This book, while very readable, manages to answer all the questions you ask without spending 4 years to get the degree in antropology. I trust you will agree that it the best source of the answer, and since you will read it anyway, I do not have to duplicate the effort and type extensive qotes here. I hope you will enjoy it. hedgie |
|
Subject:
Re: hypotheses in anthropology
From: mother-ga on 26 Jun 2002 15:01 PDT |
Hello Jess, Your list almost covers what it took four years to learn and earn a degree in Anthropology. Several fields are covered in your question: Evolutionary biology, physical (now medical) anthropology, ethnography, paleoanthropology, primatology, osteology, and more. This is what makes me wary of attempting an answer. Each one of these fields has its own agenda and therefore sometimes conflicting theories about cause and effect. Certainly your list makes up a small part of what it means to be "human." When you think of one adaptation causing another, in turn causing something else and possibly being a factor in another species several thousand years away, then supporting the previous one and then branching out to cause another, you realize that there is no finite set of theories that you can plug into any of the characteristics or behaviors in your list. The most shallow research will reveal that you really have to follow one school of thought or another to be able to coherently provide an answer, and this answer will be fundamentally disagreed with by a member of the other school. You may find these resources helpful to your research: Recommended reading: Human Origins & Evolutionary Theory (Anthro.net) http://home1.gte.net/ericjw1/humanevolution.html Good luck! -- mother |
Subject:
Re: hypotheses in anthropology
From: voila-ga on 08 Jul 2002 12:36 PDT |
Hi Jess, Here's a link that might assist you in the information you're looking for. also, if you click on the "correspondent and editors" page, there are several contacts listed along with their field of specialty. http://www.pscw.uva.nl/sociosite/TOPICS/anthropo.html Best of luck on your anthropological quest, V |
If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by emailing us at answers-support@google.com with the question ID listed above. Thank you. |
Search Google Answers for |
Google Home - Answers FAQ - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy |