Google Answers Logo
View Question
 
Q: health information ( No Answer,   3 Comments )
Question  
Subject: health information
Category: Computers
Asked by: layaabr-ga
List Price: $2.00
Posted: 27 Apr 2004 19:08 PDT
Expires: 11 May 2004 21:20 PDT
Question ID: 337353
Is the number of citations of an author?s work a good indicator of the
quality of his or her work?
Answer  
There is no answer at this time.

Comments  
Subject: Re: health information
From: pinkfreud-ga on 27 Apr 2004 19:12 PDT
 
I don't think so. Look at the Web: misinformation proliferates
rapidly. A single posting of an erroneous factoid on the Internet
sometimes gets picked up and reposted by hundreds of other sites. The
fact that something is widely spread doesn't say much about its
reliability or quality. You can spread a pile of horse manure widely,
but it's still manure. ;-)
Subject: Re: health information
From: ac67-ga on 28 Apr 2004 07:28 PDT
 
I agree with  pinkfreud.  The number of citations is dependent on
many, many factors, including how much interest there is in the
subject of the work, whether it is controversial (in which case it may
be widely cited to support one side of an argument), how much press
attention it receives, the reputation of the organization for which
the author works, etc.  It may also be widely cited by further studies
refuting the study.  For instance a study which suggested a link
between MMR vaccine and autism is very widely cited, both by those who
are opposed to vaccination and by a number of other researchers who
have published studies refuting it.  Interestingly 10 of the 13
authors of that study recently came out and said they disagreed with
their own conclusions in the original study:
http://www.nytimes.com/2004/03/04/science/04AUTI.html?ex=1083297600&en=c967c6d9c4ccc259&ei=5070

I'm not bringing this up to elicit debate about autism and MMR, but to
show how a study, in which the majority of the authors admit the
conclusion was not fully supported by the data, has become very widely
cited.  This is one of the frustrating things about science.  In
newspapers, if it is published it is assumed to be true, and the more
it is published, the more it is accepted as true.  In scientific
journals, publication is more a statement of "this is what I found and
how I found it, what do you all think?"
Subject: Re: health information
From: nenna-ga on 30 Apr 2004 14:22 PDT
 
Ahhh, subjective answers. My favorite. I would have to agree with our
intrepid reseacher Pinkfreud though on this one.
The site member ac67 had some great points as well.

Nenna-GA
Google Answers Researcher

Important Disclaimer: Answers and comments provided on Google Answers are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Google does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. Please read carefully the Google Answers Terms of Service.

If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by emailing us at answers-support@google.com with the question ID listed above. Thank you.
Search Google Answers for
Google Answers  


Google Home - Answers FAQ - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy