![]() |
|
![]() | ||
|
Subject:
Deforestation in the United States
Category: Business and Money > Economics Asked by: grahammarine-ga List Price: $20.00 |
Posted:
01 May 2004 09:21 PDT
Expires: 31 May 2004 09:21 PDT Question ID: 339394 |
Need the current figure or the percentages of acceleration over the last three decades. | |
|
![]() | ||
|
There is no answer at this time. |
![]() | ||
|
Subject:
Re: Deforestation in the United States
From: neilzero-ga on 01 May 2004 19:17 PDT |
Omivorous made some good points. The forests were first cut in much of the USA more than a century ago to make timber and later lumber, lay railroad track grow food and cattle. Now we import about half of our food, meat and other products and the import percentage is still increasing. Many of the farms and ranches and railway right aways are growing up in scrub trees = nature is reforesting. Other huge tracts have been replanted and cut repeatedly for lumber and paper making. It does not seem fair to me to count each tree cut, without subtracting at least some of the trees that have been planted in the last 30 years. My guess is the deforestation of the USA since 1974 has been about -2% which is to say reforestation has occured. More acres are presently forested. The trees are removing more carbon dioxide and providing more shelter for endangered animals and plants as well as plants and animals that are not endangered. The total number of trees has increased, perhaps even the total board feet growing. In my neighborhood, there are at least 40 trees over 40 feet tall per average acre. It will be difficult to show in an honest way that deforestation is occuring in the USA as a whole. Centuries of wild fire, continue to dwarf small local deforestation. Neil |
Subject:
Re: Deforestation in the United States
From: neilzero-ga on 01 May 2004 19:29 PDT |
With a few local exceptions acelleration has not occured the past 30 years. The trends have been flat = constant = not accelerating = except perhaps we are replacing hardwoods with pine trees to a slight extent which is possibly accellerating and the number of trees over 100 feet tall may decreasing slightly. Generally these very tall trees are less effective in removing carbon dioxide per acre than medium size trees, nor do the very tall trees serve any other function that I know of better than medium trees, other than to stand in awe, and as habitats for spotted owls. Neil |
If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by emailing us at answers-support@google.com with the question ID listed above. Thank you. |
Search Google Answers for |
Google Home - Answers FAQ - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy |