|
|
Subject:
CURRENT BODY COUNT OF AMERICAN BLACKS KILLED IN IRAQ AND THEIR FIRST NAMES
Category: Relationships and Society > Politics Asked by: mcisencraft-ga List Price: $9.50 |
Posted:
13 May 2004 20:06 PDT
Expires: 02 Jun 2004 10:20 PDT Question ID: 346132 |
|
There is no answer at this time. |
|
Subject:
Re: CURRENT BODY COUNT OF AMERICAN BLACKS KILLED IN IRAQ AND THEIR FIRST NAMES
From: denco-ga on 13 May 2004 21:52 PDT |
For Researchers and McIsencraft, This might be tough because there might not be a list by race for Iraq. Full list of all names (as of May 8, 2004) is here: http://web1.whs.osd.mil/mmid/casualty/oif_list_of_names.pdf |
Subject:
Re: CURRENT BODY COUNT OF AMERICAN BLACKS KILLED IN IRAQ AND THEIR FIRST NAMES
From: acidtest4u-ga on 14 May 2004 11:16 PDT |
You can also have a look at http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/world/iraq/casualties/facesofthefallen.htm Where you will find name & photos for most those soldiers. Just reading one page is a little bit saddening you will have to decide on your own what is "black" ? things may not be as simple as in the civil war! |
Subject:
The posted links are close to your answer this one will help too
From: harp890-ga on 14 May 2004 22:21 PDT |
The figures of Blacks buried in Arlington cemetery are shamefully used by both Republicans and Democrats to make political hay. As an example below is a snippit from a Govt. report listing an exact location: "the time of Park's funeral in 1929, Daniel "Chappie" James (Section 2, Lot 4968-B, Grid V-33) was a 9-year-old boy working odd jobs to earn money for flying lessons. Within the 140 years that spanned the lifetimes of these two men, thousands of blacks were interred at Arlington National Cemetery -- silent headstones echoing the impressive progression of roles blacks h played in America's growth However when someone like you tries to find out exact figures all govt. sources seem to get a type of "honky tonk amnesia" and won't "let the truth come out" The below link to the Arlington cemetary has lots of info on Blacks, civil war stats and possibly something to help you. Please post the results of your project. PS Dont hold your breath for a Google worker to take this question. http://www.arlingtoncemetery.org/text/black_history_text.html |
Subject:
Re: CURRENT BODY COUNT OF AMERICAN BLACKS KILLED IN IRAQ AND THEIR FIRST NAMES
From: politicalguru-ga on 15 May 2004 00:56 PDT |
Dear Harp, Google Answers Researchers (I assume that what you meant) are not Google employees or workers, but independent contractors. There could be several rasons why a certain question may go unanswered: - It could be, that for the current fee of $9.5 (from which Researchers get 75%) researchers find it too time and resource consuming to look for an answer; - It could be that Researchers are buffeled, like AcidTest, from the definition of "Black" when there are'nt any "official" list by race. Should we look at people's faces and determine if they are black or not? Should we go over this unfortunately very long list and and search for each name, if any news source mentions him or her as African American? - It could be that it is just impossible to answer the question with the tools we have today. - And since there are 500 Researchers, it could be just that the right Researcher, who has access to the answer, has not seen this question yet. |
Subject:
Re: CURRENT BODY COUNT OF AMERICAN BLACKS KILLED IN IRAQ AND THEIR FIRST NAMES
From: denco-ga on 15 May 2004 13:16 PDT |
Actually, there are summaries of military casualties, including one that has information on race/ethnicity. It is not specific by name and it "only" covers 1980 through early 2003. It, and others, can be found here on the US Department of Defense "Directorate for Information Operations and Reports" web site. http://web1.whs.osd.mil/mmid/casualty/castop.htm "Military Casualty Information ... Race/Ethnicity Summary" Questions can be asked of them through email at: Comments@dior.whs.mil They can be contacted by phone as well at: 703-604-4575 There is no political "hot potato" that I can see. It might be that it is just not a priority of the military to identify the race of the individuals that have died in Iraq. Considering everything that has and is happening there, that is actually reasonable. |
Subject:
THE DRUDGE REPORT CURRENTLY HAS A LINK TO ALL THE NAMES AND ALMOST ALL PHOTOS
From: harp890-ga on 15 May 2004 21:09 PDT |
Right now the Drudge Report online has a link called " The List" about half way down their website. It goes to a military outlet that has ALL the names, info and a photo for almost every soldier slain in Iraq to date. The photos are of a good enough quality that you can spot any "recgonizable miniority" However you will be in for a long long project. They only load about 20 at one time. I hope you post your findings as to if Civil War ratios have tapered off or gotten worse on you Bible findings. harp. |
Subject:
Re: CURRENT BODY COUNT OF AMERICAN BLACKS KILLED IN IRAQ AND THEIR FIRST NAMES
From: denco-ga on 15 May 2004 22:54 PDT |
Here is the list that harp890-ga mentions. http://www.militarycity.com/valor/honor.html Not all of the entries have pictures. |
Subject:
I NOW HAVE TO GIVE UP ON THIS QUESTION, THANK YOU ALL FOR YOUR HELP
From: mcisencraft-ga on 16 May 2004 19:03 PDT |
I have almost 40 hours of time on this question and even with the great comments I was given I just have to give up. It would take about "$500 Google Dollars$" to even get close to the answer I have found. Several have asked what I found out so far. I will post it here but it could almost be called junk science because I am going on such a small sliver of information. Also the addition of Black or "Project Names" like Jammall, Tyrone, Falishaa etc. have skewed results from the Civil war. I could not get all Arlington cemetary info so here is the best I have. "Project" or Black named soldiers........................about 400% from baseline chance of getting killed in Iraq. "Regular" Named Blacks (Tony, Bill, Alice etc)....... 0% Baseline death toll "Bible Named Blacks" (Jeremiah, Amos,Esther,etc)..Almost a 200% better chance to NOT GET KILLED in Iraq. |
Subject:
Re: CURRENT BODY COUNT OF AMERICAN BLACKS KILLED IN IRAQ AND THEIR FIRST NAMES
From: politicalguru-ga on 31 May 2004 18:16 PDT |
But, my dear mcisencraft, what is the percentage of each "name division" you did within the general African American population in Iraq? It could be obvious that certain "name types" have "better chance" of getting killed, because there is much higher frequency of these names among the enlisted; and even that does not imply any conclusions on the link between names and death-toll (what a horribly morbid subject!) - the link could be totally indirect: 1. More people of a certain social sub-group join the military than from other sub-groups; 2. In the same sub-group, there are several more popular names than others. |
Subject:
politicalguru question KEEPING IT SIMPLE LIKE THE CIVIL WAR STATS IF POSSIBLE.
From: mcisencraft-ga on 31 May 2004 22:16 PDT |
This research far from being "morbid" is a genuine peek at combat ratios the Black community has endured from the Civil war until now. Instead of clouding things up with "name divisions" and frequency theories etc. I am endeavoring not to use frequency/ to find out how bad Blacks are getting shot up in Iraq and comparing that ratio to what happened during the Civil War. As you can see from the last 7 comments some have been quite helpful. The Drudge link gave a ?baseline? of all Blacks who currently have been killed in Iraq. Normal names were used as a baseline not frequency or enlistment ratios as one commenter suggested. For a shoestring study to get at the truth this is about as close as it gets without government help. As an example if the Governor of Louisiana called the Whitehouse during an election year and wanted immediate info on how many Louisiana Blacks were killed in Iraq he would have an answer in 1 day. It would be a very accurate list. The current ratio (Listed above 2) is as close as I know how to make the comparison. Even a casual review of the names shows Bible names are listed way less than the ?street? or ?project? names as they are sometimes called. Make of it what you will. One note. I was surprised that the software mentioned above mentioned ?Rufus? as being in the Bible. Upon checking this is true....Twice. |
If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by emailing us at answers-support@google.com with the question ID listed above. Thank you. |
Search Google Answers for |
Google Home - Answers FAQ - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy |