|
|
Subject:
UN Resolutions & the United States
Category: Relationships and Society Asked by: capnharbatkin-ga List Price: $15.00 |
Posted:
14 May 2004 08:59 PDT
Expires: 13 Jun 2004 08:59 PDT Question ID: 346365 |
Hello, I'd like to know HOW MANY United Nations resolutions the Unites States is CURRENTLY in violation of. If possible, it would be really helpful to have the quantities broken down by category (i.e. environment, Middle East, business law, etc.) I'd also need to know what resources are out there to collect this information. Thanks in advance |
|
There is no answer at this time. |
|
Subject:
Re: UN Resolutions & the United States
From: ac67-ga on 14 May 2004 09:37 PDT |
This is an interesting question, although it would also be interesting to see that info for other countries as well. What it really does is serve to highlight the ineffectiveness of the UN. If it doesn't have the teeth to enforce its resolutions, be they against the US or Iraq or others, then it leaves the door open for individual countries to say, "While if you don't enforce it we will." They then can pick and choose which UN resolutions they wish to enforce, while claiming that they are just enforcing UN mandates. A large part of the mess in Iraq is due to UN resolutions which were not enforced. Sadaam thumbed his nose at the UN by kicking out its inspectors and doing everything he could to not allow inspections for WMD. He did this because much of his power in the region came from the reputation for having and being willing to use WMD. So even if he no longer had any, it was still in his interest to make everyone suspect he did, while at the same time denying it. I think because the first President Bush stopped short of all out war on Iraq due to international considerations, he mistakenly assumed the second one wouldn't do anything without UN approval either. I think he felt comfortable in the knowledge that the UN wouldn't really do anything to enforce the resolution. Unfortunately, the US acted independently and called his bluff. |
Subject:
Re: UN Resolutions & the United States
From: vicmanb-ga on 31 May 2004 09:59 PDT |
This is a very ambiguous question. Perhaps it would be helpful to narrow it down yourself, in that, I mean that it depends on where the resolutions were adopted. If a UN resolution was adopted in the General Assembly, it is non-binding, but only acts as a recommendation. Security Council resolutions are binding, but as we saw last year (and as mentioned by the previous poster), the only loss was to the UN itself, due to the US's independance. Perhaps what you are looking for are treaties that the UN is in violation of. International treaties, such as the Convention of the Rights of the Child have not been ratified by the US gov't, but has been signed. This means that the US is not bound by it. Interesting that a country like Somalia has signed and ratified it, but not by the US. Other treaties the US hasn't ratified include the 1999 Ottowa Mine Ban Treaty, Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women and the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment. |
Subject:
Re: UN Resolutions & the United States
From: vicmanb-ga on 31 May 2004 10:00 PDT |
*Ooops* I mean "Perhaps what you are looking for are treaties that the *US* is in violation of." |
Subject:
Re: UN Resolutions & the United States
From: gragnar-ga on 23 Oct 2004 14:25 PDT |
Iraq actually complied fully with weapons inspectors, even if grudgingly. http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/iraq/2003-03-17-inspectors-iraq_x.htm |
If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by emailing us at answers-support@google.com with the question ID listed above. Thank you. |
Search Google Answers for |
Google Home - Answers FAQ - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy |