|
|
Subject:
Sheep and Low-Interference Government
Category: Relationships and Society > Government Asked by: nronronronro-ga List Price: $10.00 |
Posted:
16 May 2004 16:45 PDT
Expires: 15 Jun 2004 16:45 PDT Question ID: 347277 |
Hi There ! I live in the Bay Area of California. This morning, I read about a junk yard owner who was arrested and jailed for keeping a pet sheep in his junk yard. I have no idea why the guy had a sheep. That's not the gist of my question, and I probably don't want to know. :) There must be states where government plays a smaller role in the lives of the citizenry. For lack of a better term, let's call them Libertarian states. The first two that come to mind would be Texas and Alaska, though I have no idea if the data would support this view. My views of "high liberty, low interference, more freedom" in those states may be based upon old stereotypes. A 5-star answer would be a list of Top 10 states (of 50) which stay out of the lives of their citizens. You can use any metric you prefer (e.g., amount of regulation, activist law enforcement, skepticism of government, most people minding their own business, speed limits, motorcycle helmet laws, etc.). An ideal metric would be omnibus. That is to say, a great Top 10 ranking would have many different factors "baked into" the High Freedom rating. All comments greatly appreciated...even from you big-government-is-good folks ! :-) Thanks. ron |
|
Subject:
Re: Sheep and Low-Interference Government
Answered By: bobbie7-ga on 16 May 2004 17:30 PDT Rated: |
Dear Ron, Thank you for accepting my comments as the answer to your question. Economic Freedom of North America 2004 Annual Report ?Economic Freedom of North America presents the first comprehensive economic freedom ratings for US states and Canadian provinces. The study rates economic freedom on a 10-point scale for two indexes. An all-government index captures the impact of restrictions on freedom by all levels of government. A subnational index captures the impact of restrictions by state or provincial and local governments. Economic Freedom of North America employs 10 variables in three areas: 1. Size of Government; 2. Takings and Discriminatory Taxation; and 3. Labor Market Freedom. This year?s report adds a new variable to Area 3: Labor Market Freedom that is designed to measure how much policy affects workers? freedom to join, or not to join, unions.? Top 10 Freest States Delaware Colorado Georgia Nevada New Hampshire South Dakota Louisiana Tennessee Texas Arizona Download full report here: http://www.freetheworld.com/efna2004/EFNA2004.pdf Download parts of the report here: http://www.freetheworld.com/efna.html Read the Media Release http://www.freetheworld.com/press012704.html From Catallarchy.net: http://www.catallarchy.net/blog/cgi-bin/archives/001093.html Delaware - First in Freedom http://www.professorbainbridge.com/2004/03/delaware_first_.html Search criteria: Freest States top 10 Freest States Best regards, Bobbie7 |
nronronronro-ga
rated this answer:
Thanks a million, bobbie7 ! ron |
|
Subject:
Re: Sheep and Low-Interference Government
From: bobbie7-ga on 16 May 2004 17:06 PDT |
Hi Ron! Would the ranking from the following report meet your needs? Economic Freedom of North America 2004 Annual Report ?Economic Freedom of North America presents the first comprehensive economic freedom ratings for US states and Canadian provinces. The study rates economic freedom on a 10-point scale for two indexes. An all-government index captures the impact of restrictions on freedom by all levels of government. A subnational index captures the impact of restrictions by state or provincial and local governments. Economic Freedom of North America employs 10 variables in three areas: 1. Size of Government; 2. Takings and Discriminatory Taxation; and 3. Labor Market Freedom. This year?s report adds a new variable to Area 3: Labor Market Freedom that is designed to measure how much policy affects workers? freedom to join, or not to join, unions.? Top 10 Freest States Delaware Colorado Georgia Nevada New Hampshire South Dakota Louisiana Tennessee Texas Arizona Download full report here: http://www.freetheworld.com/efna2004/EFNA2004.pdf Download parts of the report here: http://www.freetheworld.com/efna.html Read the Media Release http://www.freetheworld.com/press012704.html From Catallarchy.net: http://www.catallarchy.net/blog/cgi-bin/archives/001093.html Regards, Bobbie7 |
Subject:
Re: Sheep and Low-Interference Government
From: bobbie7-ga on 16 May 2004 17:08 PDT |
Delaware - First in Freedom http://www.professorbainbridge.com/2004/03/delaware_first_.html |
Subject:
Re: Sheep and Low-Interference Government
From: pinkfreud-ga on 16 May 2004 17:19 PDT |
I'm very much in favor of low-interference government, but I can understand why an urban area would forbid the keeping of sheep. If you've ever been around adult sheep, you'll know what I mean. They can be incredibly smelly, for one thing. And their dispositions aren't as sweet and cuddly as most folks expect; mature rams tend to attack people, butt them to the ground, and trample on them. Maybe this meant to be the woolly equivalent of a junkyard dog. |
Subject:
Re: Sheep and Low-Interference Government
From: nronronronro-ga on 16 May 2004 17:19 PDT |
Hi bobbie7 ! Terrific work, as always. You are also speedier than Wyle E. Coyote ! Please post as an answer so I can pay you. Thanks ! ron |
Subject:
Re: Sheep and Low-Interference Government
From: nronronronro-ga on 16 May 2004 17:22 PDT |
Thanks for your comments, Pink. I would never tangle on the subject of sheep with someone named Freud. heh heh heh Thanks again. ron |
Subject:
Re: Sheep and Low-Interference Government
From: neilzero-ga on 16 May 2004 20:07 PDT |
I hope some one can find an analysis of the non-ecconomic freedom. Since most of this is forced on us by the federal government and perhaps soon internatanal tribunals, perhaps the frequency of inforcement is more important than the laws that are rarely enforced, which varies even by village and neighborhood. I feel this is an important matter that needs multiple sourses. I will be voting for Harry Browne or whoever the Libertarians choose. I may leave my ballot blank where my only choice is a Republican or Democrat for some offices. Neil |
Subject:
Re: Sheep and Low-Interference Government
From: nronronronro-ga on 16 May 2004 20:56 PDT |
Neil, I believe your notion of non-economic freedom is exactly right. The number of regulations and amount of taxation is probably less important than the "attitude" and "cultural norms" of a state. Personally, I would rather reside in a mind-your-own-business state than a we-know-what's-best-for-you state. How should I phrase a new question for the researchers? The goal is to explore non-economic freedom (laissez-faire culture) instead of economic (by the numbers) freedom. All comments appreciated ! ron |
Subject:
Re: Sheep and Low-Interference Government
From: neilzero-ga on 17 May 2004 03:37 PDT |
Here is suggested wording: This is a follow up of my question of 16May04@16:45 PDT. Getto dwellers typically have less government in their face, but excessive violence from the local people. Can you find some low violence communities in the USA that offer citizens maximum free agency = self determination = freedom in non-economic matters? Villages in the mountains of Utah perhaps, except the Mormons don't mind their own business? Bobbie7-ga found Delaware best for ecconomic freedom. |
Subject:
Re: Sheep and Low-Interference Government
From: nronronronro-ga on 18 May 2004 08:54 PDT |
Neil, Your comments are always intriguing. Thanks a million ! ron |
If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by emailing us at answers-support@google.com with the question ID listed above. Thank you. |
Search Google Answers for |
Google Home - Answers FAQ - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy |