|
|
Subject:
Employee vs population ratio studies
Category: Reference, Education and News > Teaching and Research Asked by: staugustine-ga List Price: $90.00 |
Posted:
23 May 2004 16:11 PDT
Expires: 26 May 2004 13:39 PDT Question ID: 350904 |
I am searching for studies for smaller rural resort communities such as Vail Colorado, Bend Oregon, Truckee California, or Mammoth Lakes California (but not necessarily limited to these examples) that determine the ratio of jobs that are created by population in the town. For example, if a new home constructed houses on average 2.6 people, how many jobs do those 2.6 people generate within the community to support them? These jobs would include everything from the meter reader , a checkout person at the grocery store, a school teacher, a lawyer, a doctor etc... |
|
There is no answer at this time. |
|
Subject:
Re: Employee vs population ratio studies
From: neilzero-ga on 23 May 2004 22:25 PDT |
There likely are some studies like that, but I'm not sure they are predictive of what will happen with the next issolated community that grows bigger. IMHO the results are strongly dependent on the wealth and spending habits of both the old inhabitants and the new ones. Aspen, Collorado attracts rich internationalist skiers, while other communities would attract retires living at or close to the poverty level. The cost of stimulating, and sustaining the growth also is a factor. Neil |
Subject:
Re: Employee vs population ratio studies
From: staugustine-ga on 24 May 2004 07:37 PDT |
Thats not the question I asked... I simply want to see existing studies that draw conclusions about current communities. |
If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by emailing us at answers-support@google.com with the question ID listed above. Thank you. |
Search Google Answers for |
Google Home - Answers FAQ - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy |