![]() |
|
![]() | ||
|
Subject:
Existance
Category: Science Asked by: wasting_time-ga List Price: $5.00 |
Posted:
01 Jun 2004 00:52 PDT
Expires: 01 Jul 2004 00:52 PDT Question ID: 354608 |
![]() | ||
|
There is no answer at this time. |
![]() | ||
|
Subject:
Re: Existance
From: probonopublico-ga on 01 Jun 2004 00:58 PDT |
Great Question. I don't know the Answer but it sure is fun to be here, isn't it? |
Subject:
Re: Existance
From: wasting_time-ga on 01 Jun 2004 01:03 PDT |
ya it can be fun, unless your born into some 3rd world country... im not really having any fun althoe i want too, im in a position in life where i cant :( |
Subject:
Re: Existance
From: wasting_time-ga on 01 Jun 2004 01:03 PDT |
im not from a 3rd world country btw |
Subject:
Re: Existance
From: neilzero-ga on 01 Jun 2004 10:01 PDT |
Most religions regard God as having neither beginning nor end. Mormons = the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints do believe God had a begining long ago much like we began. Some science fiction writers suggest someone with a time machine went back in time and caused the creation of God. Neil |
Subject:
Re: Existance
From: bobby_d-ga on 01 Jun 2004 12:52 PDT |
Would love to answer, but always hesitant with questions of this genre. If you believe that everything in the universe must have a cause (ie, that everything exists on cause and effect), one must be forced to believe that either the world has no temporal beginning or that there is some ultimate effect that has no cause (christian philosophers call this effect God - this is ultimately the philosophical argument for god's existence). However, many refuse to accept a world of cause and effect, particularly with the recent discovery of Quantum mechanics in the 20th century - and the Uncertainty Principle - that in fact, things occur on a sub-atomic level that are completely random and have no cause. Before the Big Bang? Scientists theorise that there existed a certain nothingness, comprised of (if memory serves, which is unlikely) around 36 fields - describing how matter is to be allowed to exist (for example, form in protons, neutrons, electrons, in a certain fashion to create atoms - and, of course, on a sub-sub-atomics level, the structure and behavious of quarks.) Apparently there was some shift or disturbance in this field that triggered the big bang. What exactly was this trigger? What was there before this field? Who knows. But food for brain. Particularly that of probonopublico, it appears. ;) bobby_d |
Subject:
Re: Existance
From: pugwashjw-ga on 02 Jun 2004 06:41 PDT |
To Wasting time Ga; This is the question that men have been asking themselves for aeons. The ancient Greeks did it and developed philosophy. Ancient tribal peoples in Europe and the Americas thought about it and tied in their beliefs with what they could see in the night sky. Then the CREATOR of men chose ONE man who had a belief in a single all-powerful entity or god, to let all men know their origin. The man was Abram, later Abraham, and his history was later written down as the "Old Testament" by Moses. This writing was preserved from change by God himself. These writings we now know to be the Bible. The whole story of man`s beginning at Adam and Eve right up to the writings of the Apostle John in his old age. The Bible relates how God created man and woman, established marriage [ in the sight of God] how the human numbers increased, how badness entered the world via Satan, and his Nephilim, how the earth was cleansed of bad people, except eight, in the worldwide flood, and how the numbers of humans on the earth again increased to the time of Moses.. Moses through the direct inspiration of God, was directed to put it all in writing for the benefit of all future generations. When after 1500 years, God fulfilled the prophecy at Genesis 3;15, The meaning of the "bruising" in the head, and in the heel differentiates between a death dealing injury and a serious but non lethal injury. Satan would be instrumental in having Jesus killed, but God would resurrect Jesus to heavenly life, this being the non lethal injury. The death dealing injury will be to Satan, when he and his demons will be done away with permanently and no longer have any bad influence in the lives of men. The whole Bible has a single theme. the future coming of God`s Kingdom, where all men will obey God`s rules. It is up to us to learn them and if we dont, the results are very plain in Second Thessalonians 1;8. And what is God`s desire for us?. First Timothy 2;4...whose will is that all sorts of men should be saved, AND COME TO AN ACCURATE KNOWLEDGE OF TRUTH . Can we change?. Second Timothy 3;14..You, however, continue in the things that you learned, AND WERE PERSUADED TO BELIEVE, knowing from what persons you learned them. So it is up to us to believe that God has written down his instructions and for us to follow them. If the Bible says there is one God with one son, why believe a religion that says there are multiple gods. If the Bible says pray to God ONLY through Jesus, why try and pray through so called "saints". If the Bible says there is an evil being called Satan, [Revelation 12;7-9] why believe any religion that says that evil is from only us?..The accurate information is right there in writing in front of us...in the Bible. |
Subject:
Re: Existance
From: wasting_time-ga on 03 Jun 2004 00:47 PDT |
... |
Subject:
Re: Existance
From: wasting_time-ga on 03 Jun 2004 00:58 PDT |
woah calm down... first of all i know all of what you speak of. try to compare science with the bible... for example when god cast out satan into hell i look at that as sort of chemical or some kind of reaction of two oppisite forces, anyways thats besides the question... i want to know the exact cause of everything and how it started out. oh and to clear up matters on my last comment i am not against science at all, its just silly when scientists try to become masters of the universe because they rely on educated guesses that are quite far fetched :) oh and one more thing... no im not cool with evil but one thing i do know, in a funny way "satan" is gods servant cause without evil what is good? (kinda like the yin yang) so if one wanted to truley destroy the force of good they would have to destroy evil. |
Subject:
Re: Existance
From: journalist-ga on 03 Jun 2004 10:56 PDT |
An interesting question and since you've referenced the Christian concept of Satan, I've always wondered this: If the Christian God is all powerful and controls everything, then that God controls Satan as well. If this is, indeed, the case, wouldn't that mean the Christian God is responsible for everything that Satan allegedly does? Perhaps both our questions will go unanswered...lol Best regards, journalist-ga |
Subject:
Re: Existance
From: blitzen-ga on 03 Jun 2004 21:52 PDT |
There seems to be an assumption in this dialogue that Time moves in only one direction. That is, I exist and therefore something must have come before to create me. By analogy we convince ourselves that since the Universe exists something must have come before to create it; and something came before to that; and so on. That argument sounds very much like I cannot finish the race because I run halfway to the finish line and take a break, and then I run halfway from there to the finish line and have another break. If I only ever go halfway from where I start to where I am to finish, then I will never finish because I can always divide the distance in half no matter how infinitesimally small that distance may be. Now, anyone who has ever finished a race knows that this argument is ludicrous. I propose that it is equally ludicrous to assume that there is a state where the Universe does NOT exist and therefore needs to be created. (I am stating my thesis in the present tense and I am making the assumption that Time is one of the dimensions of the Universe and that it is possible to be anywhere within its topological space; and therefore temporality of tense is mute.) The Universe DOES exist, I exist, you exist, and wasting_time-ga exists. Some things, like existence just needs to be accepted. I do not think that I have sufficient imagination to comprehend the true nature of the Universe. My significance is very small and my perspective is narrow ? I live a VERY short time on a cosmological scale, I see time as only moving forward, I can only capture knowledge about things that my senses can perceive. If we met someone who truly understood the Universe and who agreed to explain it to us, I am not sure we would have the frame of reference necessary to understand the explanation. I think this may be a ?Time Wasting? exercise because we are not asking the right questions to find the answers that we really want to know. If we could formulate the right questions, then we would be a lot closer to understanding the nature of the Universe. |
Subject:
Re: Existance
From: bobby_d-ga on 04 Jun 2004 14:45 PDT |
blitzen-ga -- I agree with you (and enjoyed what you had to say). Of course, as a member of a the universe, it IS very difficult for us to examine how it is that we exist within (or 'imagine', if you wish). And of course, time is not disparate from space, a concept difficult for us to comprehend with our thorough knowledge and belief in the concepts of speed, acceleration, movement, and all of that. There are of course those that before cause and effect does not exist. And not only is there no proof that it does exist, there is now proof that it doesn't exist - with Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle. So why should there exist a cause of the universe? (I know I have reverted to a straight-line view of time, but I wanted to get that in :p) happy thinking. bobby_d-ga |
Subject:
Re: Existance
From: wschloss-ga on 07 Jun 2004 12:33 PDT |
Possibly interesting paper for you: http://bat.phys.unsw.edu.au/~charley/papers/Thermobiology4color.pdf |
Subject:
Re: Existance
From: wasting_time-ga on 09 Jun 2004 03:35 PDT |
ahhh yes blitzen... your comment was taken into concideration by me before i posted my original question... this "assumption" of how the universe works as in that everything came from somthing is somthing we humans know for sure... allow me to explain... define common sence... do you get it now? it is the order of our known universe and so far unless somthing really crazy happens it will remain that way. cicken or the egg? |
Subject:
Re: Existance
From: wasting_time-ga on 09 Jun 2004 03:46 PDT |
journalist: yes in a way it is... "god" controlling "satan" is nothing more then the circle of life... lets say some sadists get off on throwing babys in blenders or somthing sick like that... why would god allow such brutality? well if you think about it you would have to know the awnser of what happens when we die and the afterlife... one thing i do know for sure is that childs pain is somthing temporary in this world (this is why i dont fear death or anything for that matter) when that childs dies then what pain did he ever experience? i mean he/she is dead so it kinda never happend. but i do believe that before innocent blood is spilled weather its a baby or an adult that the person goes through no pain... like the body knows death is near and shuts off before pain |
Subject:
Re: Existance
From: wasting_time-ga on 09 Jun 2004 03:51 PDT |
wschloss: holy sh*t!!!!!!! SCIENCE GIBBERISH!!!!!! i swear to god the nut case who wasted his time on that pdf is a good example of how using science to explain the cosmos can lead to improper thought paths being carved out in his brain. |
Subject:
Re: Existance
From: wasting_time-ga on 09 Jun 2004 04:02 PDT |
blitzen: ahh yes one more comment for you before i go... this regards your second comment... please take one thing into concideration... what is "time"? it is somthing we humans invented to track our seasons and what not... i guess farmers inveted it or somthing, anyways changing subjects allitle, time does not really exist, it is somthing we use to document to movement of life and therefore time travel and einstiens theroy of relativity is BULL!!! SCIENCE GIBBERIH!!!!!! anyways i havent read up on einstiens theroy in a long time (correct me if im wrong) but if you travel away from earth at the speed of light or even faster (assuming you dont turn into light itself from going that fast) and came back, i am sorry to say that nothing special will happen... lets say you left for 30 mins going at the speed of light and then came back going the same speed... only 1 hour would have passed by.. it took you 30 mins to get there and 30 mins to come back... nothing more... nothing less... does that provide a better defeinition of common sence? lol damn i have really bad spelling :P |
If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by emailing us at answers-support@google.com with the question ID listed above. Thank you. |
Search Google Answers for |
Google Home - Answers FAQ - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy |