![]() |
|
![]() | ||
|
Subject:
TWO UNFIT MOTHERS HARMING THEIR KIDS! WHICH ONE IS WORSE?
Category: Health > Medicine Asked by: mcisencraft-ga List Price: $3.00 |
Posted:
02 Jun 2004 19:15 PDT
Expires: 02 Jul 2004 19:15 PDT Question ID: 355655 |
Using these two scenarios which mother harms her child the most. 1.A heavy 3 pak a day smoker who smokes from the time she is impregnated and 9 months later the day the baby is born she finally quits. OR 2.A mother who does NOT smoke during pregnancy but the day her child is born starts smoking 3 packs a day for 9 months, transferring the nicotine to her child by her breast milk. We will assume that second hand smoke is not a factor. This third question is not required for payment but do you have any ideas that States can take a child away from an unfit mother if the child has excessive nicotine in its blood test? |
![]() | ||
|
There is no answer at this time. |
![]() | ||
|
Subject:
Re: TWO UNFIT MOTHERS HARMING THEIR KIDS! WHICH ONE IS WORSE?
From: steph53-ga on 02 Jun 2004 20:14 PDT |
Hi... As a long time smoker ( and not a researcher )..I gave birth to 2 kids who are now smoke free.... Not sure how much this will validate your research however... |
Subject:
Re: TWO UNFIT MOTHERS HARMING THEIR KIDS! WHICH ONE IS WORSE?
From: jrwhite67-ga on 09 Jun 2004 14:40 PDT |
Nicotine itself has not shown significant detrimental health problems. The big problem is, however, the smoke from the cigarettes. One of the consequences of smoking while pregnant is low birth weight, so I would submit that smoking while pregnant poses more harm than starting to smoke after pregnancy and breast feeding. |
If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by emailing us at answers-support@google.com with the question ID listed above. Thank you. |
Search Google Answers for |
Google Home - Answers FAQ - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy |