|
|
Subject:
Top 20 films in Canada (by box office gross) for year end 2003
Category: Arts and Entertainment > Movies and Film Asked by: ferrisap-ga List Price: $5.00 |
Posted:
09 Jul 2004 09:06 PDT
Expires: 08 Aug 2004 09:06 PDT Question ID: 371835 |
Top 20 films in Canada (by box office gross) for year end 2003 I might accept 2002 numbers if 2003 is unavailable. | |
| |
|
|
Subject:
Re: Top 20 films in Canada (by box office gross) for year end 2003
Answered By: hummer-ga on 12 Jul 2004 13:53 PDT Rated: |
Hi ferrisap, Thank you for letting me know that the combined statistics for the US and Canada would be suitable. DOMESTIC = NORTH AMERICA International does not include Canada: http://www.boxofficemojo.com/intl/ 1) MOJO: 2003 Domestic Grosses: http://www.boxofficemojo.com/yearly/chart/?yr=2003&p=.htm 2) Box Office Report: Domestic: 2003: Last updated on Jun. 23, 2004 http://www.boxofficereport.com/ybon/2003gross.shtml Additional Links: "Domestic amounts include US and Canada." http://www.boxofficeguru.com/intl.htm "The number listed in the most recent domestic (US and Canada) theatrical box office gross we have available." http://www.leesmovieinfo.net/BoxOfficeInserts.php Thanks again, hummer I searched all "box office" statistic websites that I could find. |
ferrisap-ga
rated this answer:
Thanks |
|
Subject:
Re: Top 20 films in Canada (by box office gross) for year end 2003
From: scribe-ga on 12 Jul 2004 09:25 PDT |
This turned out to be harder than I thought it would be. As you have no doubt discovered, movie box office grosses in the US and Canada are combined to give North America grand totals. So far, I have been unable to find a breakout that gives Canada only. Even a leading Canadian newspaper, reports on 2003 results by givng the North America totals: www.globeandmail.com/servlet/ArticleNews/movie/MOVIEREVIEWS/20040... Another instance of American culturial colonialism? |
Subject:
Re: Top 20 films in Canada (by box office gross) for year end 2003
From: scribe-ga on 13 Jul 2004 03:29 PDT |
It's very likely that the top 20 films in the US were also the top 20 films in Canada. But it is also possible that the rankings would be different in the two countries. And I suspect that it is even possible that a film that does boffo business in the US may not do so well in Canada and therefore may NOT make the Top 20 Canada list (if such a list exists). The American market is so huge and the Canadian market so small in comparison, that a lackluster performance in Canada might not prevent a film from making the Top 20 North America list, providing that it does great in the US. Canadians do have their own preferences (including for Canadian films). Take Fahrenheit 9/11 for example. It may make this year's top 20 North America list. BUT if there were a breakout of the US and Canada, it is quite conceivable that it would rank higher in Canada than in the US because anti-war and anti-Bush sentiment is even more prevalent and fierce there than it is in the US. Just some thoughts for you. scribe_ga |
Subject:
Re: Top 20 films in Canada (by box office gross) for year end 2003
From: ferrisap-ga on 13 Jul 2004 09:27 PDT |
Thanks for the comment scribe. It seems that Canada only stats are available from Nielson but they don't make that info publicly available. The Canada & US combined fiogures should be sufficient. |
Subject:
Re: Top 20 films in Canada (by box office gross) for year end 2003
From: petertc-ga on 03 Aug 2004 07:11 PDT |
FWIW, a few weeks ago I discovered this site which lists both the North American Top Ten *and* the Canadian Top Ten: http://www.tribute.ca/box_office/box_office.htm It changes every week, but I have been keeping track of the differences between Canadian and "North American" figures for a few weeks now, here: http://artsandfaith.com//index.php?showtopic=3066 As of last week, Canada had about 9.7% of the "North American" population but accounted for 14.1% of the box office of Fahrenheit 9/11, while accounting for only 5.0% of the box office of Catwoman. It seems that films which mock American politics (such as Fahrenheit) and films with a British hook (such as King Arthur and Harry Potter) do noticeably better here, while films of a dumb-lowbrow-vulgar-humour nature (such as Anchorman, DodgeBall, White Chicks) do noticeably worse. FWIW, I also came across a story in the Globe and Mail in which Dan Fellman of Warner Brothers said most films do about 8% of their "North American" business in Canada, but Troy (which was a huge hit internationally) made about 14% of its "North American" money here. And I believe I read a report several months ago which said The Passion of the Christ made about 6-7% of its "North American" money in Canada. So there are definitely cultural differences. |
Subject:
Re: Top 20 films in Canada (by box office gross) for year end 2003
From: petertc-ga on 03 Aug 2004 07:17 PDT |
Oh, one other thing. It seems so-called "urban" (i.e. African-American) films don't do as well in Canada as they do in the United States, for obvious demographic reasons. I remember how, the week You Got Served was #1 in "North America", the newspaper ads for The Butterfly Effect proclaimed that *that* film, which came a distant second in "North America", was #1 in Canada! (That week, You Got Served made $16.1 million in "North America", while The Butterfly Effect made $9.6 million -- barely more than half. That's how big the gap is!) |
If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by emailing us at answers-support@google.com with the question ID listed above. Thank you. |
Search Google Answers for |
Google Home - Answers FAQ - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy |