Google Answers Logo
View Question
 
Q: Number of Women Experiencing Signs and Symptoms of Preterm Birth ( Answered 1 out of 5 stars,   5 Comments )
Question  
Subject: Number of Women Experiencing Signs and Symptoms of Preterm Birth
Category: Health > Conditions and Diseases
Asked by: rhesley-ga
List Price: $200.00
Posted: 30 Jul 2004 00:54 PDT
Expires: 29 Aug 2004 00:54 PDT
Question ID: 381192
I am looking for a credible source for the number of women each year
in the United States who seek urgent medical attention for signs and
symptoms of preterm birth.  I believe the number to be around 1
million women or episodes per year.  I found the following website
(www.lvpa.com/articles/fibronectin.htm) which confirms my number, but
I am looking for a more reliable and credible source.  A U.S.
government source would be ideal.  Please help!
Answer  
Subject: Re: Number of Women Experiencing Signs and Symptoms of Preterm Birth
Answered By: pafalafa-ga on 30 Jul 2004 20:19 PDT
Rated:1 out of 5 stars
 
Hello rhesley-ga,


Thank you for a most interesting -- and troubling -- question.  

The source you referenced at the Center for Maternal Fetal Medicine:


http://www.lvpa.com/articles/fibronectin.htm


notes that:  "Over one million episodes of preterm labor occur
annually in the United States..."


While this figure strikes me as on the high side, it is not wildly so.
 Preterm labor/preterm birth is a serious -- one is tempted to say,
epidemic -- problem in the United States, and one that has resisted
public health efforts to reduce the overall incidence.

I will detail some of the key sources of information on preterm labor
and preterm birth in my answer, below.

If any of the information is not clear, or if you need additional
information, just let me know by posting a Request for Clarification,
and I'll be happy to assist you further.

pafalafa-ga


==========


The bottom line:

There were  480,812 preterm births in the United States in 2002. 
Preterm births are defined as births occurring before 37 full weeks of
gestation (a more detailed, clinical definition is given below).

This was 12.1% of the total of 4,021,726 births that year -- a high
rate that has been increasing  in the past few decades.

The actual number of women experiencing preterm labor is not known,
and has never been well-documented or even reliably estimated.  With
almost half a million preterm births occurring (not all of which are
associated with preterm labor), it seems unlikely that there are
double that number of women experiencing preterm labor episodes
serious enough to require urgent medical attention.  However,  I
wouldn't dismiss the one million figure entirely -- it does seem to be
within the range of possibility, albeit at the high end of the range.


==========



The most authoritative source of information on the prevalence of
preterm births in the US comes from the CDC's National Vital
Statistics series of reports:


http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr52/nvsr52_10.pdf
National Vital Statistics Reports
Vol. 52, No. 10, December 17, 2003
Births: Final Data for 2002

What follows are some excerpts from the report, with my own added
comments in brackets:



--There were 4,021,726 live births in 2002,

--Preterm delivery is a leading cause of neonatal mortality and
birth-related morbidity.

-- Influenced in part by the rising rate of multiple births (multiples
are more likely to be born early), the proportion of preterm infants
has risen 14 percent since 1990.

--The steep rise in multiple births over the past two decades has had
an important influence on the overall preterm birth rate...twins,
triplets, and higher order multiples are much more likely to be born
earlier than singletons
[Most observers consider the increase in twins, triplets and other
multiple births to be a key contributor to the rising rate of preterm
births]

--The preterm birth rate increased again in 2002, to 12.1 percent of
all births, from 11.9 percent in 2001.

--The proportion of infants born preterm...has risen 14 percent since
1990 (10.6 percent) and 29 percent since 1981 (9.4 percent).
[Hard to believe that our health care system has taken such a large leap backwards]

--The bulk of the rise for 2001-2002 was for moderately preterm
births, that is, infants born at 32-36 weeks; the percent of infants
born very preterm (less than 32 weeks) was essentially unchanged at
1.96 percent.

--The overall rate for tocolysis, the use of agents that inhibit or
delay uterine activity for the management of preterm labor, was 2.1
percent in 2001 and 2002. The rate of tocolysis has been fairly stable
since 1996. Discussion on the safety and efficacy of these agents is
ongoing.
[About 2.1% of pregnant women experiencing preterm labor are treated
with drugs intended to minimize the likelihood that the episode will
result in preterm birth.


--Unfortunately, meaningful reduction in preterm births is unlikely
until its causes are better understood.

--[The report includes a detailed table of the number of births and preterm births]

Table 43. Live births by birthweight and percent very low and low
birthweight, by period of gestation and race and Hispanic origin of
mother: United States, 2002

All births -- 4,021,726

Total under 37 weeks -- 480,812

Under 28 weeks -- 29,425

28-31 weeks -- 48,420

32-35 weeks -- 224,364

36 weeks -- 178,603

[Of the total of 480,812 preterm births, the greatest number occur
relatively late in the preterm period (32 weeks and beyond), which
greatly reduces the likelihood of mortality or complications for the
infant.  Earlier preterm births experience the bulk of the medical
problems.]


==========


Another extensive government sponsored study that sheds additional
light on the topic of preterm labor and births is the "Management of
Preterm Labor" report:


http://www.ahrq.gov/clinic/epcsums/pretermsum.htm
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality 
Evidence Report/Technology Assessment: Number 18

Management of Preterm Labor


The report at the link above is the Executive Summary, but the full
report can be downloaded by clicking on the link at the bottom of the
Executive Summary.

The excerpts below are from Chapter 1 of the full report, which
summarizes the information known -- and not known -- about the extent
of preterm labor:

==========

Overview and Burden of Disease

--Although preterm labor is the most common cause of antenatal
hospitalization, the number of pregnancies in which preterm labor
occurs is documented inadequately.

--the number of...pregnancies in the United States affected by the
occurrence of preterm labor that do not result in preterm birth has
not been projected accurately.

[This theme is repeated throughout the report -- the actual number of
preterm labor episodes is simply not known, nor is there
reliable-enough  data to even allow for a good educated guess]


--research criteria for diagnosis of preterm labor:  "contractions
occurring between 20 and 36 weeks' gestation at a rate of four in 20
minutes or eight in 1 hour with at least one of the following: 
ruptured membranes, cervical change over time, dilatation   2.0 cm, or
cervical length   1.0 cm."
[This is apparently the most widely-used clinical definition, though
for most purposes, simply saying "earlier than a full 37 weeks" is
more than adequate]


--No consensus exists regarding the diagnosis or the treatment of
preterm labor.  Approaches range from essentially "watchful waiting"
or traditional "conservative interventions" (e.g., bed rest) to
complex diagnostic and therapeutic regimens involving biologic marker
tests (diagnosis) and pharmacologic agents (antibiotics, tocolytic
drugs and perhaps corticosteroids) and to system-wide (e.g., state or
county) programs to detect and manage the condition

--Preterm labor afflicts pregnant women of every socioeconomic class,
and ethnic group, and age.

--Preterm labor can be addressed in clinicians' offices, private and
public inpatient and outpatient settings, free-standing birth centers,
and patients' homes.

--The morbidity for babies born preterm can manifest in many ways. 
Short-term outcomes for newborns can  include acute and chronic lung
disease, central nervous system hemorrhage, and blindness.  Long-term
outcomes can involve cerebral palsy, mental retardation, and learning
disability, and other forms of developmental delay.

--Approximately, three-quarters of neonatal deaths can be attributed
to preterm birth

--More than one-half of neurologic impairments found in children can
be attributed to preterm delivery


==========


So you can see, preterm births are a serious and growing problem in
the US.  Data on preterm births is very well-documented, but
equivalent data on the incidence and outcomes of all preterm labor
episodes simply does not yet exist.

Before rating this answer, please let me know if you need any
additional explanation or information.


pafalafa-ga


search strategy:  Searched Google, Pubmed, and offline medical
databases for [ "preterm labor" (incidence OR epidemiology) ]

Request for Answer Clarification by rhesley-ga on 31 Jul 2004 09:54 PDT
Thank you for the details on preterm birth, but you did not provide an
answer to my question.  Please revise my status as unanswered if you
are unable to answer the question.

Clarification of Answer by pafalafa-ga on 31 Jul 2004 10:16 PDT
Hi there,

I'm happy to continue working on this.  Could you kindly give me a bit
of additional feedback, though.  What, specifically, are you looking
for in the way of additional information?  The more detail you can
provide, the better I can target my follow-up research.

Thanks.

pafalafa-ga

Request for Answer Clarification by rhesley-ga on 01 Aug 2004 07:10 PDT
My question is very specific:
How many women seek urgent medical attention for signs and symptoms
preterm birth each year in the U.S.?  Whether they deliver or not, I
am not concerned with.  Just simply how many women prior to term (37
weeks) go to the ER with problems such as "spotting", suspected labor,
of other indicators of preterm labor or birth.  I need a credible
source, not the www.lvpa website.

Please do not provide me with a bulk of data that does not answer this
question specifically.  Steph53-ga, that is why I rated the previous
answer with 1 star.

Clarification of Answer by pafalafa-ga on 01 Aug 2004 07:32 PDT
Rhesley-ga,

I'll be following up on this, but I suspect it will be a few days
before I can respond, as I have several queries out and requests for
interlibrary loan documents, etc.

Please be patient...I'll get back to you by the end of the week.

pafalafa-ga

Clarification of Answer by pafalafa-ga on 04 Aug 2004 13:02 PDT
Hello again, 


I have located some additional information that may more closely meet
your needs for a quantitative estimate of the number of urgent-care
preterm labor cases in the US.

A recent study published in Military Medicine examined the rate of
preterm labor and preterm births among women in the military:


Premature labor and birth
Janice Chiyomi Stinson, Kathryn A Lee. 
Military Medicine
May 2003.Vol.168, Iss. 5;  pg. 385


An abstract of the study can be found here:


http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt=Abstract&list_uids=12775174


alhtough the interesting details are in the text of the study itself,
which is not available on-line.  However, here is an excerpt of one of
the key findings:


"Preterm labor occurred in 13.9%...of the sample and preterm birth
occurred in 9.5%..."


These data are of interest for two reasons:

--They show that the rate of preterm births among women in the
miliatary (9.5%) is generally comparable to the rate seen in the
general population (11-12%).

--They also reveal that the number of preterm labor events is about
50% higher than the number of preterm births (13.9% compared to 9.5%).


Applying the 50% figure to the number of preterm births in the country
as a whole (480,812 in 2002) leads to an estimate of about 720,000
episodes of preterm labor in the same year.

This figure of 720,000 presumably represents an upper estimate of the
number of women who would be seeking urgent medical care for preterm
labor.   In all likelihood, only a certain percentage of these women
would actually seek "urgent care", as many of them would be assisted
under less-than-urgent-care circumstances by their primary medical
care provider.  Unfortunately, there do not appear to be statistics
that allow a reasonable estimation of this percentage, and we are left
with the 720,000 figure as an upper bound.

I'll also note that, despite several attempts at contact, I have not
yet heard back any information from the Center for Maternal Fetal
Medicine as to the origin of the one million figure that they cite. 
If they do get back to me, however, I'll be sure to include any
updated information here.

I hope this information fully meets your needs.  However, do not
hesitate to post another Request for Clarification if you feel you
would like additional information on this topic.

Al the best,

pafalafa-ga

Clarification of Answer by pafalafa-ga on 05 Aug 2004 12:34 PDT
Hello once again.

I have some good news.  I was finally able to track down a
difficult-to-get paper that has some very pertinent numbers for you.

The study is:

Economic Burden of Hospitalizations for Preterm Labor in the United States
Nicholson, et al
Obstetrics and Gynecology 96:1:95-101
July 2000

An abstract of the study is here:


http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Abstract&list_uids=20323582


although -- as was the case earlier -- the really interesting details
are in the main body of the article.

In particular, Table 3 of the article details the number of hospital
admissions in the US in 1994 for preterm labor, based on data from the
1994 National Hospital Discharge Survey conducted by NIH.

Overall, there were:

313,309 hospital admissions due to preterm labor

Of these:

123,715 admissions were classified as "undelivered", and

189,594 admissions led to an early delivery.  


These appear to be precisely the data you needed.  

But as always, let me know if you have any additional questions about
the information I've provided here.


All the best,

pafalafa-ga
rhesley-ga rated this answer:1 out of 5 stars
A lot of interesting facts were provided that I was already aware of,
but the answer to my question was not provided.

Comments  
Subject: Re: Number of Women Experiencing Signs and Symptoms of Preterm Birth
From: epedia-ga on 30 Jul 2004 03:21 PDT
 
Hi,

Please find the US government source below. It carries a table which
gives accurate number in "Table # 27-2."

http://www.usuhs.mil/fap/capcon/Pretermlaborhandout.doc

Best Regards
epedia
Subject: Re: Number of Women Experiencing Signs and Symptoms of Preterm Birth
From: epedia-ga on 30 Jul 2004 03:51 PDT
 
Hi,

Find also the below US government source websites on Preterm Birth
(PTB) statistics in USA:

http://www.cdc.gov/epo/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/00056645.htm
http://www.cdc.gov/od/oc/media/pressrel/fs2k0922.htm
http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm4937a2.htm
http://www.cdc.gov/reproductivehealth/datoact/pdf/birout2.pdf
http://www.cdc.gov/od/oc/media/pressrel/r990316a.htm

Best Regards
epedia
Subject: Re: Number of Women Experiencing Signs and Symptoms of Preterm Birth
From: steph53-ga on 31 Jul 2004 14:04 PDT
 
Rhesley....

Why did you rate this answer so poorly before giving Pafalafa
clarification of your question? Just remember, once a rating is given
to an answer, it cannot be changed. The researchers here are not mind
readers and an ongoing dialoque to clarify things is sometimes
extremely helpful.
Just my 2 cents.

Steph53
Subject: Re: Number of Women Experiencing Signs and Symptoms of Preterm Birth
From: mdeal-ga on 03 Aug 2004 23:37 PDT
 
Hi--I couldn't help but respond.  I am an independent
writer/researcher who experienced preterm labor with all three of my
pregnancies.  I seriously doubt there are any reliable actual
statistics about how many women seek "urgent" medical care regarding
preterm labor.  Preterm labor is rarely a sudden event even though it
sounds like it would be.  Women who are under care of a doctor during
their pregnancies would call their doctor and perhaps go to either the
doctor's office or the OB floor of the hospital, but the visit would
not be in the same category as an urgent ER visit.  I had probably
20-40 unscheduled checks during the course of my three pregnancies,
but none of these would have been recorded in ER statistics.  There is
not one conduit through which these cases go, and, as the answer
specifies, there is not reliable data on preterm labor.  The
researcher essentially says that the answer is not available.

I would refute one point in the answer.  The researcher writes:
"With
almost half a million preterm births occurring (not all of which are
associated with preterm labor), it seems unlikely that there are
double that number of women experiencing preterm labor episodes
serious enough to require urgent medical attention.  However,  I
wouldn't dismiss the one million figure entirely -- it does seem to be
within the range of possibility, albeit at the high end of the range."

Though the treatment of preterm labor is far from perfect, there are
great numbers of women on bedrest and medication, and probably most of
them, with proper medical care, end up getting close to term.  There
is no way that half of the women with preterm labor end up having a
preterm birth.  Therefore, the number of women getting medical care
(the definition of "urgent" is a problem) for preterm labor is
probably well over double the number of preterm births.  One million
does not seem high to me at all, but even low.  I would not be
surprised if the number of women experiencing preterm labor is
anywhere from 5 to 20 times the number of preterm births.  Though I
was high-risk, with long-term bedrest & meds, my situation was not
unusual.  Each of my doctors (I lived in different locations for my
pregnancies)  had several patients with the same problems at the same
time I had mine.  If it is common for a single OB to have several
patients simultaneously with preterm labor, it is doubtful that the
one million is at all high.

Did you know that there are "Bedrest Boards" online for pregnant
women?  Since the hard numbers are so difficult to track (what about
women with Midwives or family doctors rather than OBs?), try checking
out qualitative data from the women on the boards.  They have time,
and would probably love to chat about the whole thing.

I know that my comments are subjective, but in the absence of
objective data, it seems relevant.  Your answer is very good,
Pafalafa.

MDeal
Subject: Re: Number of Women Experiencing Signs and Symptoms of Preterm Birth
From: pafalafa-ga on 04 Aug 2004 11:27 PDT
 
Thanks to mdeal-ga for the comments and information, and for her added
personal perspective...it's much appreciated.

I agree, the definition of "urgent medical care" is one of the
complicating factors in this whole question.

I'm still trying to track down the origins of the "one million"
figure, and will post an update when I have additional information on
this.

pafalafa-ga

Important Disclaimer: Answers and comments provided on Google Answers are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Google does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. Please read carefully the Google Answers Terms of Service.

If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by emailing us at answers-support@google.com with the question ID listed above. Thank you.
Search Google Answers for
Google Answers  


Google Home - Answers FAQ - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy