![]() |
|
![]() | ||
|
Subject:
Modern Theology
Category: Relationships and Society > Religion Asked by: cormorant-ga List Price: $25.00 |
Posted:
10 Jul 2002 15:13 PDT
Expires: 09 Aug 2002 15:13 PDT Question ID: 38300 |
I am interested in references to modern theology texts in which the author(s) suggests that each of the worlds great religions have certain negative tendencies that correspond to various types of psychic illness: Choose your religion [implies] choose your illness. The author(s) suggests that there is a certain association between Judaism and manic-depressive disorder, between Christianity and sadomasochism. I am interested in finding if this author(s) continued on to characterize Islam, Buddhism, or Hinduism, but if I just can get the reference, I will look this up myself. | |
| |
|
![]() | ||
|
There is no answer at this time. |
![]() | ||
|
Subject:
Re: Modern Theology
From: rmg-ga on 10 Jul 2002 15:39 PDT |
Am I correct in understanding that you already know of an author who suggested these connections for Judaism and Christianity, and you want to see if this same author had similar ideas about other religions? If so, the name of the text and author would probably help a Researcher find further material. However, your use of "texts" instead of "text" seems to suggest you wouldn't mind other authors. Perhaps you could clarify the question. |
Subject:
Re: Modern Theology
From: pinkfreud-ga on 10 Jul 2002 16:36 PDT |
This may be of some use: In a sermon whose audio version I have heard, but which I cannot find on the Web, Rabbi Lionel Blue said something to the effect that Judaism tends toward characteristics of obsessive-compulsive neurosis, while Christianity exhibits certain sado-masochistic tendencies, and megalomania can characterize Islam. I am not aware of similar references to Buddhism or Hinduism by Rabbi Blue. Rabbi Blue has several books in print, but I do not know whether this sermon, or a variant of it, has appeared in essay form. |
Subject:
Re: Modern Theology
From: pinkfreud-ga on 10 Jul 2002 18:21 PDT |
In reference to my previous comment, I have learned that "Doubts and Loves: What Is Left of Christianity," a book by Richard Holloway, apparently quotes Rabbi Lionel Blue on the subject of Judaism, Christianity, and Islam and their respective similarities to obsessive-compulsive disorder, sado-masochism, and megalomania. A review of Holloway's book, including a portion of the Rabbi Blue quote, is here: http://www.sofn.org.uk/Whatsnew/doubts_and_loves.htm |
Subject:
Re: Modern Theology
From: hippychick-ga on 12 Jul 2002 07:41 PDT |
Dear cormorant, I don't know how many *theology* texts you're going to find that address this issue... theologians seem to generally support religions, rather than think of them as "diseased". If you're looking for other sources, however, I might be able to recommend something. I tend to come at the issue from a psychological arena, and I just spent part of an undergrad semester looking at the intersection between psychology & religion. Traditionally psychology has been pretty hostile to it, although attitudes are changing. The prevailing idea now seems to be that "spiritual" development of one kind or another (organized or unorganized religion, or even a positive belief in the "human" spirit) can help out your psyche. However, religion and religious expression can be caught up in Robert Sapolsky (who could probably be classified as an evolutionary psychologist, and has studied primates extensively) has written an interesting collection of essays which touch on this topic. They are collected in his book "The Trouble with Testosterone" and I think they'd make easy reading even for those who don't have a biology/psychology background. In the last essay of the book, the title of which I don't remember, he speculates somewhat wildly about how complicated religious rituals may have sprung from the mind of a leader who had obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). Other psychological disorders are also mentioned, and he provides some support for his way of thinking by giving exampples from Buddhism, Hinduism, and other non-Judeo-Christian religions (although, as you probably realize, these hypotheses on the origin of religion cannot be tested and are therefore not "scientific" per se). Sapolsky generalizes, but I think it's food for thought on your specific question. Anyway, here's a link to the book on Amazon.com: http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0684838915/qid=1026482806/sr=2-3/ref=sr_2_3/102-0549543-9700146 Or check out your local friendly college library (yay free things!). Thanks for posting; I hope this was helpful or at least interesting! ~hippychick Search strategy: "Sapolsky" on Google |
Subject:
Re: Modern Theology
From: hippychick-ga on 12 Jul 2002 07:47 PDT |
Oops, my first paragraph didn't paste so well. What I meant to say at the end there was that religious expression can be caught up in diseases, as in people who have delusions of being Jesus or extreme paranoia about being "watched" by god. It's not the religion that causes the disorder, it's messed-up brain chemistry expressing itself in a religious context (a schizophrenic paranoid about the government watching just expresses his paranoia differently). |
Subject:
Re: Modern Theology
From: worldoffernsy-ga on 02 Aug 2002 11:00 PDT |
Find a copy of "Journey to Self-Realization" by Paramahansa Yogananda. Your local library will probably have a copy, or if not, your local Border's or other bookstore. Yogananda was an Indian philosopher and yogi who made it his life's work to demonstrate the underlying principles behind all religions, and his work is very strong on the subject. Excerpted from "The Need for Universal Religious Principles" from the above book; "The varying views of religionists are akin to the story told ... about six blind brothers who were washing an elephant [basic premise - each of them washes a different part of the elephant and each assumes their own part of the elephant to be representative of the entire elephant] ... At the height of the quarrel, their sighted father arrived and explained, "You are all right and you are all wrong. Right because you correctly described what you experienced, but wrong because each of you experienced only a part of the whole." "Man's consciousness ... gradually experiences more and more of the nectar-ocean of truth. Each person can absorb only to the degree of his individual experience. These differences in perception are the cause of argument." By very nature of being human, we are partial, unable to comprehend the entirety of existence. It is when a human clings to his/her belief system as being superior to that of another's belief system, and is willing to defend that with force instead of learning, that mental rigidity and illness develops. What is ironic about this is that there are atheists who are just as rigid and inflexible and fanatical as any dogmatic believer. From here it is a short hop to the conclusion you were seeking; that each religion is a grouping of people encouraging the same system in each other, and therefore often encouraging the same neuroses. The strength of a human being can be seen by his willingness to see the Spirit "equally in all, regardless of race, creed, position, intellect or bank balance or any other external pointers." |
If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by emailing us at answers-support@google.com with the question ID listed above. Thank you. |
Search Google Answers for |
Google Home - Answers FAQ - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy |