Google Answers Logo
View Question
 
Q: "Lottie Taylor case" ( Answered 5 out of 5 stars,   1 Comment )
Question  
Subject: "Lottie Taylor case"
Category: Relationships and Society > Law
Asked by: rrtnrvrb-ga
List Price: $40.00
Posted: 11 Jul 2002 14:08 PDT
Expires: 10 Aug 2002 14:08 PDT
Question ID: 38616
A September 1947 article by James Peck ("Not So Deep Are the Roots,"
The Crisis) about the 1947 "Journey of Reconciliation" (testing
segregation in interstate transportation), mentions "the Lottie Taylor
case" currenly pending in the Virginia Supreme Court. I'd like to know
more about this case--I'll consider an answer anything that verifiably
cites the case as it eventually came to be heard (such as "Morgan v.
Virginia, 1946") and gives some information on what was involved and
how things turned out. Thanks!
Answer  
Subject: Re: "Lottie Taylor case"
Answered By: juggler-ga on 11 Jul 2002 18:08 PDT
Rated:5 out of 5 stars
 
Hello.

The case is:

LOTTIE E. TAYLOR V. COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, Supreme Court of
Virginia, March 1, 1948. The citation is: 187 Va. 214 ; 46 S.E. 2d 384
; 1948 Va. LEXIS 214 .

I have obtained the full-text of the Virginia Supreme Court decision
from Lexis-Nexis, but I can't reprint the whole decision here because
of copyright restrictions. You may obtain the full-text of the
decision from Lexis-Nexis by credit card for $9.
http://www.lexisnexis.com/

I will, however, summarize the case for you, with selected quotations
where appropriate:

On September 12, 1946, Mrs. Lottie E. Taylor purchased a ticket to
ride a bus from Washington, D.C., to Brightwood, Madison County,
Virginia. The bus was operated by a company called Virginia Stage
Lines, Incorporated. Upon boarding the bus, Mrs. Taylor sat in the
fifth seat from front of the bus. The driver requested that Mrs.
Taylor move to back of the bus since "under the rules and regulations
of his company, colored persons were required to sit in the rear and
white persons in the front." The driver further informed Mrs. Taylor
that while the regulations were not enforced in Washington, DC, they
were enforced in Virginia and that she would have to move to back of
the bus when they entered Virginia.

The bus driver then directed Mrs. Taylor's attention to a list of
regulations posted near the front of the bus. The list include
regulations such as: "The Company reserves full control and discretion
as to the seating of passengers... White passengers will occupy space
nearest the front of the bus, and colored passengers will occupy space
nearest the rear of the bus... Any passenger who shall engage in any
disorderly conduct on a bus... or who shall fail or refuse to comply
with these regulations shall be subject to removal."

Mrs. Taylor refused to give up her seat. The bus driver later
testified that Mrs. Taylor "said in a very loud voice at one point 'I
will not move.'"

Upon entering Virginia, the bus driver deviated from his route and
drove to the Fairfax County Court House. At the court house, Mrs.
Taylor was removed from the bus and charged with violating Virginia
Code 4533a (riotous or disorderly conduct in a public place).

Mrs. Taylor was tried in the Circuit Court of Fairfax county on a
warrant charging that on September 12, 1946, Mrs. Taylor "did
unlawfully cause an unnecessary disturbance in an omnibus [bus] or
public conveyance by failing to move to another seat when lawfully
requested so to move by the operator thereof, said failure being in
violation of section 4533a of the Code of Virginia."

Mrs. Taylor pleaded not guilty and waived her right to a jury trial.
The trial judge found Mrs. Taylor guilty and ordered her to pay a $5
fine.

Mrs. Taylor appealed her conviction on the grounds that there was
insufficient evidence to show that she was guilty of disorderly
conduct, that section 4533a was vague and ambiguous, and that the
statute amounted to unconstitutional regulation of interstate
commerce.

Although it rejected Mrs. Taylor's latter arguments, the Virginia
Supreme Court agreed that there was insufficient evidence to sustain a
charge of riotous or disorderly conduct.

Basically, the Court decided that mere noncompliance with the rules
and regulations of the bus company was not a criminal offense. The
Court stated that Mrs. Taylor "had not disturbed any person or person
or caused any commotion affecting, in any degree, the peace or good
order of the bus. Neither her words nor her acts had a vicious or
injurious tendency... She merely insisted upon what she deemed her
rights. She was guilty of no definite misbehavior or misconduct in the
sense that she was disorderly or turbulent... The delay and the
deviation in [the bus'] operating schedule were dependent upon the
determination and wish of its operator..."

Therefore, the Virginia Supreme Court reversed the judgment of the
trial court and dismissed the charge against Mrs. Taylor.
 

search strategy: Lexis-Nexis, Virginia case law, Lottie Taylor

I hope this helps. Continued good luck with your research.
rrtnrvrb-ga rated this answer:5 out of 5 stars
Thanks once again for your absolutely first-rate help.

Comments  
Subject: Re: "Lottie Taylor case"
From: weisstho-ga on 11 Jul 2002 18:21 PDT
 
The "Irene Morgan v. Virginia" case was appealed to the United States
Supreme Court who granted certiorari and heard the case in 1946. The
entire text of the case is found at Findlaw and can be obtained, free,
by clicking on this cite:
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?navby=case&court=us&vol=328&page=373

Ms. Morgan was convicted by the trial court in Virginia, and her case
was affirmed by the Virginia Supreme Court. The U.S. Supreme Court
held that the Virginia statute was, inter alia, violative of the
Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution.

weisstho-ga

Important Disclaimer: Answers and comments provided on Google Answers are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Google does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. Please read carefully the Google Answers Terms of Service.

If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by emailing us at answers-support@google.com with the question ID listed above. Thank you.
Search Google Answers for
Google Answers  


Google Home - Answers FAQ - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy