![]() |
|
|
| Subject:
Chapter, grammar
Category: Miscellaneous Asked by: j_philipp-ga List Price: $2.50 |
Posted:
20 Aug 2004 08:26 PDT
Expires: 19 Sep 2004 08:26 PDT Question ID: 390357 |
Which is correct to write in one line, or are more than one correct (you can copy and use "x" if you want): [ ] Chapter II. A New King Was Born [ ] Chapter II - A New King Was Born [ ] Chapter II: A New King Was Born Thanks! |
|
| There is no answer at this time. |
|
| Subject:
Re: Chapter, grammar
From: daytrader_7__6-ga on 20 Aug 2004 08:59 PDT |
What are you outlining? A book? If there is a rule, it may be specific to the context. fwiw, I like the dash. "Chapter II" and "A new king is born" are different titles for the same pages. The reader's pause after reading the period is too long, and I take a colon to mean "a list follows." But the one you choose may just be a matter of personal preference. Best wishes. |
| Subject:
Re: Chapter, grammar
From: forge-ga on 20 Aug 2004 12:46 PDT |
A colon is actually a full stop in a sentence, what comes before the colon should be a full sentence, but what is after it doesn't need to be. Essentially what comes after the colon is just a continuation of the thought before the colon, or it illustrates what you said before the colon. How to effectively use a colon is explained well here: http://www.ryerson.ca/writing-centre/punctuation.pdf That aside, editing punctuation for a book doesn't always follow proper english language punctuation. Personally I like the dash as well. forge |
| Subject:
Re: Chapter, grammar
From: pinkfreud-ga on 20 Aug 2004 12:51 PDT |
The dash is acceptable, but I vote for the colon as the best choice. That's just my personal viewpoint. The only one of these three options that looks "wrong" to me is the first, which uses a period (full stop). |
| Subject:
Re: Chapter, grammar
From: pinkfreud-ga on 20 Aug 2004 13:57 PDT |
I've been thinking about this matter, and it seems to me that this is a variant of title:subtitle, as in "Star Trek: The Next Generation." Most manuals of style suggest using a colon in such cases. "According to the 15th edition of The Chicago Manual of Style (University of Chicago Press), 'a colon introduces an element or a series of elements illustrating or amplifying what has preceded the colon.' But it also advises that when referring to a book, in text and in bibliographies, a colon should be placed between a title and a subtitle, regardless of how they appear on the title page." The Chronicle of Higher Education http://chronicle.com/free/v50/i18/18a01401.htm |
| Subject:
Re: Chapter, grammar
From: j_philipp-ga on 21 Aug 2004 02:43 PDT |
Hrmm. Thanks Pinkfreud, but if you're right, than I made the wrong choice finally here: http://www.authorama.com/true-version-of-the-philippine-revolution-3.html (I used colons). I would actually like to know the most correct way of doing this for Authorama, but with these comments I suppose either it's not a clear issue, or just depends on taste... Thanks Daytrader -- yes, this is for a book, see link above. Forge -- I take it a colon then might be wrong, as I don't want a full stop? |
| Subject:
Re: Chapter, grammar
From: voila-ga on 21 Aug 2004 16:39 PDT |
Hello JP, In most cases, I would agree on the use of the colon but it's a bit of a 'house style' issue and your own sense of aesthetics. Style guides are sometimes just la-de-da suggestions, while grammar and punctuation 'rules' have more of a "you veilll comply (Laurence Olivier waiting in the wings with dental tools)" edge. Most academic writing and source manuals will trend toward colon usage, but I took a look at your URL and the periods after your chapter numbers look quite snazzy to me. As long as you don't have someone nagging to do it 'their' way, I would satisfy myself artistically. On the particular page you reference, with the bullets in between, a colon might tend to over-dot the eye of your reader at mid-level and the en dash, IMO, would be too disruptive. Also not to muddy the waters, but generally Roman numerals are reserved for parts of a book (preface, acknowledgments); Arabic for chapter numbers. I do, however, think the Roman numerals fit quite nicely with your subject matter. In the U.S., there's a general trend away from Roman numerals altogether. We see that quite a bit in medicine. We follow the style guidelines of the governing agencies (AMA, APA, JCAHO, AHA) and sometimes they blow like the wind. Recently there was a change by the ADA from type II diabetes mellitus to type 2, so style guidelines or the way something is written is rarely cast in stone. I've also seen chapter numbers spelled out (Chapter One) which seems kind of flowery but it's another way to go. I'd choose a style based on eye appeal and content and just be consistent throughout. Since yours is an eBook, I would opt for the utmost in unobtrusive punctuation. For me, in this particular case, that's a period. It's not the most 'correct' way but it's 'stylish' and completely acceptable. However, if your chapters were aligned one underneath the next, my vote would go in the colon column. Your mileage may vary. The Waffle Cone of * V * |
| Subject:
Re: Chapter, grammar
From: archae0pteryx-ga on 21 Aug 2004 23:48 PDT |
Speaking professionally, if I were your editor, I would use the period. Archae0pteryx |
| Subject:
Re: Chapter, grammar
From: pinkfreud-ga on 21 Aug 2004 23:55 PDT |
It appears that the consensus is that there's no consensus. In such a case, I think the best thing to do is to follow one's own taste. Or write a book with no chapter titles. ;-) |
| Subject:
Re: Chapter, grammar
From: j_philipp-ga on 22 Aug 2004 00:48 PDT |
Voila, thanks. As for Roman vs Arabic numerals, for that I follow the style of the Gutenberg text I use as basis for my HTML conversion. |
If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by emailing us at answers-support@google.com with the question ID listed above. Thank you. |
| Search Google Answers for |
| Google Home - Answers FAQ - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy |