|
|
Subject:
Missouri Alcohol Laws
Category: Relationships and Society > Law Asked by: greencandy-ga List Price: $10.00 |
Posted:
04 Sep 2004 11:18 PDT
Expires: 04 Oct 2004 11:18 PDT Question ID: 396837 |
Is public consumption of alcohol legal in the state of Missouri or any city therein (assuming the person consuming is of legal drinking age)? I.e. Can I buy alcohol and consume it on public property if I am over 21? | |
| |
|
|
Subject:
Re: Missouri Alcohol Laws
Answered By: markj-ga on 05 Sep 2004 13:38 PDT Rated: |
greencandy -- Thanks for your clarification, and I have been to find the specific laws you have referenced, plus a little more relevant information. A comprehensive answer for every sizable municipality in Missouri would be very impractical, but in light of your clarification I hope that what I have will more than meet your needs. First, in a very wordy ordinance, the city of Clayton generally forbids possessing alcoholic beverages in most public places ?intending to drink, drinking, or having drunk? them, with certain exceptions. Here what its law says: ?Sec. 17-12. Drinking in public. Any person who shall use, distribute, possess, purchase, sell, or otherwise obtain any intoxicating liquor, malt liquor or nonintoxicating beer, and shall be found in the city, with any of said beverages in his possession, intending to drink, drinking, or having drunk, any of said beverages, in or on any highway, thoroughfare, street, alley, place, way, parking lot, or other area open to the public for vehicular or pedestrian travel or use, regardless of his legal status or whether owned by the city or other public bodies, or by private persons, or in any public place shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor. Provided however that the provisions of this section shall not apply to: (1) Any person who has been granted a license or permit as provided in Chapter 3 of this Code of Ordinances. (2) Any person possessing a beverage container containing alcoholic beverages for immediate consumption, within the boundaries of a civic event, which was obtained from an authorized concessionaire. (3) Any person possessing a beverage container containing alcoholic beverages for immediate consumption, within thirty (30) feet of any designated outdoor dining or outdoor seating area of a restaurant duly authorized to provide outdoor dining or outdoor seating for its patrons. This exception shall apply only on those days when any permit for a civic event has been issued and only for the time during said event and within thirty (30) minutes thereafter. (4) Any person possessing an unopened alcohol beverage container, outside the boundaries of a civic event, which has been purchased from a licensed retailer for the purpose of transport to his residence or other private premises on which he is a invitee, guest, or licensee for future consumption. (5) For purposes of this section 17-12, the following words and phrases shall have the meanings set forth below, unless the context otherwise requires: a. Alcoholic beverage means intoxicating liquor as defined in Section 311.020 RSMo. b. Beverage container means any metal, glass, plastic, wood, leather or animal skin or other container, can, bottle, jug or barrel, sealed or unsealed, designed or used for containing liquids intended for human consumption. c. Civic event means any picnic, fair, festival (except those festivals described and defined in section 3-37(c) of the Clayton Code of Ordinances), carnival or other event to which the general public is invited and for which a permit has been issued for use of public streets, parks or other public property or within the area of a public park or other public place. Clayton Municipal Code: Section 17-12 http://library12.municode.com/gateway.dll/MO/missouri/1410?f=templates&fn=default.htm&npusername=10561&nppassword=MCC&npac_credentialspresent=true&vid=default Next, University City generally bans the drinking of alcoholic beverages in public, but not the mere carrying around of a container, open or otherwise. Here is its much more concise ordinance: ?Section 9.08.080 Drinking in areas open to the public prohibited. No person shall drink any intoxicating liquor or nonintoxicating beer in or upon the streets, sidewalks, parkways, alleys or parking lots of the city, or other area open to the public for vehicular or pedestrian use, regardless of their legal status or whether owned by the city or other public bodies, or by private persons; provided, however, the provisions of this section shall not apply to block parties nor to the serving of liquor or nonintoxicating beer at sidewalk cafes duly licensed under this code. (Prior code § 23-11.1)? LexisNexis: Municipal Codes: University City, Missouri http://municipalcodes.lexisnexis.com/codes/university/ The city of St. Louis?s code appears to cover pretty much the same ground as the University City ordinance: "A. No person shall drink any nonintoxicating beer or intoxicating liquor in any park, public building, street, sidewalk, alley, highway, parking lot, thoroughfare, or other public place unless consumption of intoxicating liquor or nonintoxicating beer in such place has been expressly authorized in writing by the Excise Commissioner. Provided, that nothing herein contained shall be construed to prohibit the consumption of nonintoxicating beer or intoxicating liquor by working persons during mealtime near their assigned work areas, or by picnic groups in public parks, providing that the person or persons consuming beverages are not noisy, riotous or disorderly in any manner. St. Louis City Revised Code: 14.05.010 http://www.slpl.lib.mo.us/cco/code/data/t141405.htmknall Finally, my review of the code of St. Louis County did not turn up any ordinances dealing with the subject. Here is a link to the Web page that I used to search within the County Code: St. Louis County: County Codes and Ordinaces Search http://www.co.st-louis.mo.us/council/archive.html Additional Information: Finally, according to a survey called the 2001 Partners in Prevention Coalition Campus and Community Policy Survey, the following Missouri public colleges and universities responded that they are in communities that ban "open containers" in at least some public places: Central Missouri State University Lincoln University Southwest Missouri State Truman State University University of Missouri-Rolla University of Missouri-Columbia University of Missouri-Kansas City University of Missouri-Columbia: Survey http://www.missouri.edu/~mopip/ccpsurvey.doc Finally, here is one professor?s view on how students should behave at Washington U.: "We don't live in a vacuum. I can't walk down the streets of Clayton or U City with an open container of beer. Why should students think they can behave differently than they could in the Loop or in uptown Clayton?" Washington U. Record: Alcohol on the Hilltop http://wupa.wustl.edu/record/archive/1998/11-12-98/articles/alcohol.html Search Strategy: I used various Google searches to locate the municipal codes of the jurisdictions that you mentioned in your clarification. I also used more general searches to try to find additional information (especially compilations of laws) about the ordinances of other Missouri communities. This strategy led to the survey cited above. Here is just one of many Google searches that I used: ?st. louis? mo OR missouri ?open container? public ://www.google.com/search?num=100&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&q=%22st.+louis+%22+%22mo+OR+missouri%22+%22open+container%22+public Based on your clarification, I am confident that this is the information you are looking for. If you are interested in continuing the ?conversation? about other aspects of alcohol regulation in Missouri, you may want to consider posting other discrete questions that should help you to generate that information. If any of the above is unclear, please ask for clarification before rating the answer. markj-ga |
greencandy-ga
rated this answer:
and gave an additional tip of:
$5.00
This was an incredibly thorough and well organized answer to my question. I really appreciate it. Thanks a lot! |
|
Subject:
not legal advice
From: daytrader_7__6-ga on 04 Sep 2004 19:39 PDT |
http://www.moga.state.mo.us/STATUTES/C311.HTM I don't see a relevant state statute. Maybe it is controlled by the city or county? |
Subject:
Re: Missouri Alcohol Laws
From: greencandy-ga on 05 Sep 2004 00:01 PDT |
Yeah, I couldn't find a relevant state statute either. ...Which leads me to believe it is in fact legal to consume alcohol in public if you are over 21 in Missouri. But I think you may be right that it is controlled by the city or county. Where would I find those laws? There is, however, a statute prohibiting cities and counties to punish people for public intoxication. On a different note, it is my impression that underage "posession" of alcohol is illegal, but not "consumption." It is unclear as to whether this applies merely to the public realm or also applies to possession on private property. If alcohol possession is indeed illegal on private property, I wonder if there are any punishments for (legal aged) alcohol providers? In addition, even if the law did apply to possession on private property, wouldn't it be quite hard to enforce considering anyone underage who had half a brain would immediately drop their drink upon sight of a police officer, thereby making it impossible for the police to punish them on the basis of possession (unless there was not a soul 21+ around and a couple cases of beer right by them)? It would also be pretty hard to blame 21+ providers because it couldn't be easily proved and consumption by minors is not illegal. Anyway, I've never used this google answer service before, and I'm thoroughly suprised that someone commented (why? how nice!), so I felt like rambling on in my curiosity. |
Subject:
this is not legal advice
From: daytrader_7__6-ga on 05 Sep 2004 07:17 PDT |
"it is my impression that underage "posession" of alcohol is illegal, but not "consumption." I think that you can't consume it without possessing it. In Illinois, having the drink in front of you on the table, even if the officer does not see you consume it, is enough to get an underage consumption ticket. "In addition, even if the law did apply to possession on private property, wouldn't it be quite hard to enforce considering anyone underage who had half a brain would immediately drop their drink upon sight of a police officer, thereby making it impossible for the police to punish them on the basis of possession (unless there was not a soul 21+ around and a couple cases of beer right by them)? " Same deal as above, I think. They just write the ticket anyway. Plus then you'd be littering. If Missouri is vague in their assertion that under-21 drinking is illegal, it is likely that it is only accidental. If out-of-state people under 21 even got that impression, they would start driving to MO to drink, and driving home drunk, killing people. MADD would crucify a politician or ten. With this CYA social policy in mind, the courts would quickly squash any assertion that under-21 drinking is illegal. The other thing that you probably already know, but is well worth mentioning here, a cop in a bad mood doesn't want to hear about your philosophy of the law. Always remember to treat Mr Leo with quiet, respectful humbleness. Even if you receive a citation, maintain this composure. *After* it is all over, *then* you go and call your licensed attorney and he or she will fight it out for you like the vicious dog that he or she is. Obnoxious drunks who make threats to police like "My lawyer this" and "My lawyer that" are only digging themselves a deeper hole. Speaking of lawyer, are you interested in the study of law? http://www.soyouwanna.com/site/syws/lawschool/lawschool.html |
Subject:
test
From: greencandy-ga on 05 Sep 2004 08:59 PDT |
just <em>testing</em> to see if i can post html <a href="http://www.madd.org/home/">links</a> etc. |
Subject:
Re: Missouri Alcohol Laws
From: daytrader_7__6-ga on 05 Sep 2004 09:03 PDT |
Hey Google Answers Team, when are you going to add an "edit" function? 3rd from last paragraph above, last word should be "legal." |
Subject:
Consumption / Posession and alcohol laws
From: greencandy-ga on 05 Sep 2004 09:40 PDT |
hmm...guess that html test didn't work. I'm putting my links on the bottom. ---- Hahaha. Don't worry. I'm not trying to get away with anything. Nor am I trying to be a lawyer. :) I totally agree that you cannot consume alcohol without possessing it (unless its forced down your throat), but posession and consumption, in the end, remain two very different things. Like you said, in Illinois, one can get charged with "underage consumption." As I said, there is no such consumption law in Missouri, and I wouldn't so quickly write that off as accidental. (Check out their refusal to pass the open container (in vehicle) law. The article's old but as far as I know, they still have not passed this law. (the link to the article is at the bottom - source 1)). An underage consumption law makes it possible for underage citizens to get in trouble for having consumed alcohol, even if the consumption was long before their encounter with the police. Then again, even though Missouri does not have an underage consumption law, it is quite probable that a drunk teenager would get charged with underage possession, even if the alcohol was no where to be found (although that would be harder to do.) The question is what cops are looking for. Police in Missouri are probably trained to look for visible alcohol in the hands of underage citizens as opposed to just looking for drunken teenagers. In other states, a much stronger emphasis is probably placed on looking for underage citizens who are simply intoxicated. In Missouri, public intoxication is not, on face value, a crime - even for underage citizens. "They just write the ticket anyway. Plus then you'd be littering." Haha. True. "If Missouri is vague in their assertion that under-21 drinking is illegal, it is likely that it is only accidental. If out-of-state people under 21 even got that impression, they would start driving to MO to drink, and driving home drunk, killing people. MADD would crucify a politician or ten. With this CYA social policy in mind, the courts would quickly squash any assertion that under-21 drinking is illegal." To assume that out-of-state people under 21 would drive to Missouri because Missouri has "lax" laws is silly. There are plenty of loopholes in other state drinking laws that allow underage citizens to drink with less fear of getting in trouble (2). Even in states with more strict laws about public consumption or the purchase of alcohol, there are still laws that allow underage alcoholic consumption in the privacy of your own home (3). Furthermore, even in states where underage drinking is not tolerated at all, it still remains pretty easy to obtain and drink alcohol with little fear of being caught. So really, there would be little reason to go to another state just to drink (unless you live in Utah, which apparently has really strict alcohol laws. (4). Still, there are probably a few who might drive to Missouri...who knows. In any case, it is obviously illegal in most, if not all states, to drive under the influence of alcohol. Not that that stops people, but to drive to one state to take advantage of their laws while simultaneously breaking another one is a pretty poor plan. Underage drinkers may as well just break the law in their own hometown rather than drive far away to break an even an even stricter, more consequential law. (Although we can't expect that every drinking plan will be this well thought out.) It is pretty clear that underage purchase of alcohol is illegal in most (but aparrently according to M.A.D.D. not exactly all - see "loophole" link #2) states. Beyond that, every state does have different laws. Missouri is not the only state that does not have a law against the underage "consumption" of liquor. (14 other states also have no such law. (5) And MADD seems to be on top of all of this already. Nevertheless, states can still get away with quite a few things (but not without consequences.) "The other thing that you probably already know, but is well worth mentioning here, a cop in a bad mood doesn't want to hear about your philosophy of the law. Obnoxious drunks who make threats to police like "My lawyer this" and "My lawyer that" are only digging themselves a deeper hole." Damn, I like being philosophical. But oh well. I'm of age and a pretty chill drunk (and don't drink often), so hopefully I'll never have to get all argumentative with a cop. (But law is so fun! It's almost too bad I'm not going into law.) :) Thanks for the comments! Sources: 1 - http://www.mdn.org/2002/STORIES/CONTAIN2.HTM 2 - http://www.madd.org/activism/0,1056,8248,00.html 3 - http://64.233.179.104/search?q=cache:bnujTiVxbJUJ:www.nllea.org/reports/ABCEnforcementLegalResearch.pdf 4 - http://www2.potsdam.edu/alcohol-info/InTheNews/Etc/1080326287.html 5 - http://www3.madd.org/laws/law.cfm?LawID=YCON |
Subject:
edit function
From: greencandy-ga on 05 Sep 2004 09:44 PDT |
Yeah, they really need to add an edit function. And maybe the ability to use html. I understood that you meant "legal" anyhow. |
Subject:
Re: Missouri Alcohol Laws
From: markj-ga on 05 Sep 2004 15:44 PDT |
greencandy-- Thanks very much for the kind words, the five stars and the nice tip. markj-ga |
If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by emailing us at answers-support@google.com with the question ID listed above. Thank you. |
Search Google Answers for |
Google Home - Answers FAQ - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy |