Dear Hypertrophy,
First of all, before I address the legality and the alleged voyeurism,
let me repeat the disclaimer on the bottom of this page "Answers and
comments provided on Google Answers are general information, and are
not intended to substitute for informed professional [...] legal [...]
advice".
Violating your right for privacy, voyeurism is unconstitutional and
against the law. In particular, anyone who records you or captures you
in video without your expressed consent is violating laws of the State
of Louisiana. If you suspect that such a crime had been committed
against you, your first resort should have been the police. However,
because of the complexity of the case (and difficulty to prove it),
you should be advised:
- First, to be certain that it was not just an eerie feeling that
you're being watched, but that you have been in fact watched; you
could ascertain that by hiring a private investigator that?d go
through the story. This might be expensive and time consuming, because
(for example) it might mean that someone should become an employee of
the hotel in order to know the truth for sure. Your phone call might
be helpful. But then again, as a former employee in the business, I
could tell you that "extra special services" you referred to could be
anything from having a prostitute organised by the hotel (more common
than what people might think); throwing a party there; spa or other
health treatments; VIP cards to special events; etc.
- Second, after you have some hard proof, contact a lawyer. If you are
right, you are heading for a battle against a large hotel chain. Not
an easy deal for anyone.
Here are some legal resources that might help you:
House Rpt.108-504 - VIDEO VOYEURISM PREVENTION ACT OF 2003
<http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/cpquery/?&db_id=cp108&r_n=hr504.108&sel=TOC_2691&>
Louisiana Law: RS 14:283 Video Voyeurism
<http://www.legis.state.la.us/tsrs/tsrs.asp?lawbody=RS&title=14§ion=283>
The National Centre for Victims of Crime
<www.ncvc.org/>
Now for the findings, which, I should warn you, are not much, despite
scanning the net and having searched some really despicable dark
corners of the world-wide-web. Some of the sites that were found would
not be linked here, as you are probably aware of Google Answers'
policy not to link to adult or possibly illegal material.
W Hotels themselves, at least in their Montreal branch, proud
themselves of having a "voyeur showers" (in French: " douche
indiscr?te", indiscrete showers,
<http://www.starwood.com/whotels/search/guest_rooms_amenities.html?propertyID=1471>).
I haven't found a definition of these showers, except for something
written in the Guardian "stylish rooms feature "voyeur showers" with
just a curtain for privacy" (SOURCE: The Guardian Online, "C'est chic?
You bet", Saturday August 21, 2004,
<http://travel.guardian.co.uk/cities/story/0,7450,1287602,00.html>).
However, and this is important to mention here, there is no proof that
the hotel spies or peeps on its guests without their consent and
knowledge.
Some site called "spycam" claims to have made pictures in a W Hotel.
However, again, there is no proof that this thing is done with the
knowledge or consent of W Hotel. In fact, there is no real proof that
the picture presented there are not porn pictures, made by
professional porn models/actresses with the intent of making it look
"amateur" and "peeping tom" style videos. A similar site, called
"Club-Voyeur", claims also to have "Free Files section updated with
B/W Hotel Room Bathroom #2 Escalator Upskirt (mallcam76.mpg), plus
photos "outdoor upskirt contributions." Again, it can't be guaranteed
that this was taken in a W Hotel, that it is "real" (not made by porn
professionals). A bulletin board called "Titty Board" offers a video
titled "Sandy gets laid in the "W" Hotel (lesbo-xxx)". Regarding all
three, it is worth mentioning that similar results would probably
appear if I tried names of other famous hotel chains.
In fact, searches for "W Hotel" (or "hotels") and voyeurism, voyeur,
"hidden camera" and similar themes, come out pretty thin, in
comparison to the general affluence of porn and nudity online. More
specifically, no one, even in those porn and voyeuristic forums,
discusses the option that the hotel would legitimise such an action or
organise it as a "special treat" for some guests. The porn pieces
themselves, as I explained before, would not be enough to prove
anything, as they could be doctored or "fake" (in the sense that they
are not "real" voyeurism).
There are some other people who claim to have had a horrible
experience (though of a different kind) in W New Orleans:
Trip Advisor, W New Orleans
<http://www.tripadvisor.com/ShowUserReviews-g60864-d125161-r2431981-W_New_Orleans-New_Orleans_Louisiana.html>
and also <http://www.tripadvisor.com/ShowUserReviews-g60864-d125161-r1508104-W_New_Orleans-New_Orleans_Louisiana.html>,
as well as <http://www.tripadvisor.com/ShowUserReviews-g60864-d125161-r1387847-W_New_Orleans-New_Orleans_Louisiana.html>.
Another New Orleans story from Trip Advisor you might find interesting
is this: "The engineer came to try to fix them but ended up muttering
something about "problems in the walls", offered me a free breakfast,
and left." (SOURCE: Big Advisor User Reviews,
<http://www.tripadvisor.com/ShowUserReviews-g60864-d125161-r1639350-W_New_Orleans-New_Orleans_Louisiana.html>).
Regarding noise in the room, another user has written "The noise from
the other rooms was also quite audible as the walls were paper thin"
(SOURCE: Trip Advisor,
<http://www.tripadvisor.com/ShowUserReviews-g60864-d125161-r1272429-W_New_Orleans-New_Orleans_Louisiana.html>).
I know you claim for other sources of noise, but this is only to show
you that there were other guests complaining about noise.
I hope this answered your question. In order to research it, I removed
every possible porn blocker from my search engines, and searched for
terms such as "voyeurism", "voyeur", "naked", "nude", "hidden
camera"/s, "peeping", "peeping tom", ""extra special services", etc. |