Q1. Let z_n, z be points in C and let d be the metric on C_infinity.
Show that |z_n - z| -->0 iff d(z_n,z)-->0.
Also show that if |z_n| -->infinity then {z_n} is cauchy in
C_infinity.(Must {z_n} converge in C_infinity).
Q2. Let {f_n} be a sequence of uniformly continuous functions
from(X,d)into (omega,gamma) and suppose that f= u-lim f_n exists.
Prove that f is uniformly continuous.If each f_n is a Lipschitz
function with constant M_n and supM_n<infinity, show that f is a
Lipschitz function.If
sup M_n=infinity,show that f may fail to be Lipschitz(uniformly continuous).
Please provide the complete proof/solution for the above two problems. |
Request for Question Clarification by
mathtalk-ga
on
13 Sep 2004 06:27 PDT
Hi, dicepaul-ga:
In Q1 you mention C_infinity. This is a notation that can have a
different meaning than the one I think you want here. Please clarify
what C_infinity is and how the metric d on it is defined. One might
think of C_infinity as a sphere that "completes" the complex numbers
by adding a point at infinity (often pictured as the "north pole"),
but the distance metric d can be defined in a number of (topologically
equivalent) ways.
Also you should clarify whether the final parenthetical phrase "Must
{z_n} converge in C_infinity" is meant as a question or as a simple
restatement of the previous sentence's conclusion.
In Q2's final part, think about how a uniformly continuous function
can fail to be Lipschitz. Hint: Any continuous function on a closed
bounded interval is uniformly continuous, but if it become "very
steep" at a point, then it fails to be Lipschitz. Avoiding this is
precisely the value of the assumption sup M_n is bounded in the
earlier part of this problem.
I will not be able to provide the detailed solutions you've requested
given the limited price offered. However another Researcher may take
a special interest in these problems. Normally a multiple-part
question would be listed at a substantially higher price, and as we
know you are likely to have a number of follow-up clarifications about
an answer to either part.
Please see my response to your other open question for some further suggestions.
regards, mathtalk-ga
|