|
|
Subject:
Reverse dictionary question
Category: Reference, Education and News > Education Asked by: kaosgoo-ga List Price: $3.00 |
Posted:
16 Sep 2004 16:27 PDT
Expires: 16 Oct 2004 16:27 PDT Question ID: 402268 |
What is the word for the phenomenon of noticing something more frequently after having another (possibly unrelated) experience with it? For example, say my wife and I are considering buying a red Subaru and we suddenly seem to notice them everywhere? | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
|
There is no answer at this time. |
|
Subject:
Re: Reverse dictionary question
From: pinkfreud-ga on 16 Sep 2004 16:55 PDT |
I vote for Denco's suggestion: "Synchronicity," which is often defined as "meaningful coincidence." |
Subject:
Re: Reverse dictionary question
From: denco-ga on 16 Sep 2004 17:03 PDT |
I am leaning (self servingly, but still) to "sensitized" which is defined as: "To make sensitive: 'The polarity principle... sensitizes the observer to the coexistence of seemingly contradictory phenomena'" |
Subject:
Re: Reverse dictionary question
From: archae0pteryx-ga on 16 Sep 2004 20:10 PDT |
Hmmm. I notice that all comments so far are from researchers. Well, I'm not a researcher, but I am a professional word wielder, so perhaps that gives me some credibility as an objective commenter. In my opinion, the word you want is "sensitized." You've become sensitized to a particular phenomenon and so it registers in your awareness and you have the experience of "seeing them everywhere" when there's been no change in the frequency of the stimulus, just in the filtering of your perceptions. Archae0pteryx |
Subject:
Re: Reverse dictionary question
From: pinkfreud-ga on 17 Sep 2004 12:05 PDT |
I have seen the term "constructed perception" used in cases where an individual's expectations color his observations, as when a person believes that crime in his area is on the increase when, in fact, statistics indicate the opposite. In such cases, widespread media coverage of certain kinds of crimes may have led to a false conclusion by the observer. |
Subject:
Re: Reverse dictionary question
From: pinkfreud-ga on 17 Sep 2004 12:12 PDT |
The example of noticing red Subarus everywhere sounds like pareidolia: "pareidolia (payr.eye.DOH.lee.uh) n. The erroneous or fanciful perception of a pattern or meaning in something that is actually ambiguous or random." http://www.wordspy.com/words/pareidolia.asp |
Subject:
Re: Reverse dictionary question
From: silver777-ga on 18 Sep 2004 00:14 PDT |
Hi Kaosgoo, This is my favourite subject, as it occurs often, beyond what I could call coincidence. My first reaction (before reading the replies) was "Synchronicity" (Carl Jung) as Denco first described. Our learned friends here are on the money. Would you guys be interested in discussing the topic further? My "synchs" usually appear as number patterns standing out, without even looking for paralells. No rhyme nor reason, it just happens .. noticeably. In thought, Silver |
Subject:
Re: Reverse dictionary question
From: pinkfreud-ga on 18 Sep 2004 10:08 PDT |
Another relatied concept: apophenia. "Apophenia is the spontaneous perception of connections and meaningfulness of unrelated phenomena." http://skepdic.com/apophenia.html |
Subject:
Re: Reverse dictionary question
From: pinkfreud-ga on 18 Sep 2004 10:10 PDT |
I apologize for the typo in my post above. For 'relatied,' please read 'related.' Guess I just got too excitied while typiing. ;=) |
Subject:
Re: Reverse dictionary question
From: pinkfreud-ga on 23 Sep 2004 20:31 PDT |
"...synchronicity actually refers to a theory by Carl Jung that such coincidences actually have meaningful connections. People do have a tendency to perceive order in chaos. It?s what makes us see horses in clouds, or people in mountainsides, or faces on Mars. It?s why faces on cartoon cars make more sense than faces on walls, and it?s almost certainly a factor in the popularity of numerology. I found the technical terms for this. Apophenia, or Type I error refers to seeing connections where there are none. Pareidolia refers to seeing something vague, but perceiving it as if it were something clear." http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/archives/2004/07/12/speaking-of-synchronicity/ |
Subject:
Re: Reverse dictionary question
From: silver777-ga on 23 Sep 2004 23:41 PDT |
Hi Kaosgoo and all, OK I can't resist. I need to be clear. I am a cynic. I don't go looking for coincidence. It just arrives. It may mean nothing, it may be just what it is, full stop. God knows. Two examples. 1/ My step-niece had the exact same telephone number as I, plus one digit about the middle of the number. She lived 300km from me at the time. No more to tell. But .. if we tried to coincide the numbers, what would the odds be? The difficulty with this type of coincidence is the nothingness. It just is. It can't be used as a tool for betterment. It just is what it is. 2/ A truck passes across me at the traffic lights. Black on white lettering business name is similar to a primary school colleague's name, whom I detested and fought. For the first time in my life I chose to have have good thoughts about this person. I do not buy the local newspaper daily. 3 days later I buy the local and read his name in the Death column. I had not seen this kid for 35 years. He left behind a wife and kids. Donations to the Leukaemia Foundation were suggested, in lieu of flowers. Was it just a Lotto result, or somehow meant to be? Phil |
Subject:
Re: Reverse dictionary question
From: probonopublico-ga on 24 Sep 2004 01:32 PDT |
A couple of years ago, I bought a car from a friend who had several car dealerships many miles away. I agreed to buy the car on the spec and his recommendation and when I picked it up I thought that it was reasonably rare because only a few had been imported. But then I spotted another and another ... Of course, not knowing what the car looked like I had no idea that there were others around. The word for this? Stupidity. |
Subject:
Re: Reverse dictionary question
From: xpertise-ga on 24 Sep 2004 17:07 PDT |
it's a good example of a: "conditioned stimulus" (http://allpsych.com/dictionary/dictionary1.html) Conditioned Stimulus: The stimulus in a stimulus-response chain that is not naturally occurring, but rather has been learned through its pairing with a naturally occurring chain. (http://www3.azwestern.edu/psy/dgershaw/PsychNotes2.html) Conditioned stimulus (CS): develops from a neutral stimulus (NS) via learning. Red Subarus were a neutral stimulus to you until you started learning about them for the purpose of buying one. |
Subject:
Re: Reverse dictionary question
From: silver777-ga on 25 Sep 2004 04:33 PDT |
Hey Bryan, No .. your word is NOT stupid at all. The word in your case was a phrase .. Your trust misinformed. Phil |
Subject:
Re: Reverse dictionary question
From: emjay-ga on 02 Oct 2004 12:22 PDT |
I'd propose "heightened awareness," or even "identification," in the sense that you're "identifying" with cars that are identical to yours |
If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by emailing us at answers-support@google.com with the question ID listed above. Thank you. |
Search Google Answers for |
Google Home - Answers FAQ - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy |