![]() |
|
|
| Subject:
Pier in the Thames
Category: Miscellaneous Asked by: beauregard-ga List Price: $2.00 |
Posted:
22 Sep 2004 07:38 PDT
Expires: 22 Oct 2004 07:38 PDT Question ID: 404687 |
There is a small wooden pier which goes a few feet into the Thames in the city of London, England where (according to legend) one cannot be arrested, either by the shore police nor the harbor patrol. Can you tell me the name of this pier and exactly where it is located? |
|
| There is no answer at this time. |
|
| Subject:
Re: Pier in the Thames
From: probonopublico-ga on 22 Sep 2004 07:48 PDT |
The last I heard it was full and there's a long waiting list. |
| Subject:
Re: Pier in the Thames
From: beauregard-ga on 22 Sep 2004 08:45 PDT |
probonopublico-ga aOf course it's full, but there's always room for one more and I'm getting desparate. |
| Subject:
Re: Pier in the Thames
From: beauregard-ga on 22 Sep 2004 08:47 PDT |
I meant desperate. Sorry, mis-clicked. |
| Subject:
Re: Pier in the Thames
From: pinkfreud-ga on 22 Sep 2004 09:48 PDT |
I heard that you actually can be arrested there, but you'll have to be tried by a jury of your piers. |
| Subject:
Re: Pier in the Thames
From: probonopublico-ga on 22 Sep 2004 09:51 PDT |
Hi, Beauregard Hope you find the wooden pier and that you also get a room. I hear that hotel clerks always keep one in reserve for a guest prepared to slip a lavish tip. It certainly worked for me when I went to Warsaw without a confirmed booking. Sadly, the man I went to visit who did have a confirmed booking had to sleep on a park bench ... I wonder how that could have happened? It's a great legend. All the Best Bryan |
| Subject:
Re: Pier in the Thames
From: beauregard-ga on 22 Sep 2004 10:29 PDT |
I knew that this was more than a $2.00 question. So I?ll up the ante by offering a $20.00 reward to the first person who answers correctly. Wrong answers get nothing. When I wrote desperate I meant it. The fuzz are on my tail and I don?t have much time left before they catch me. I need to achieve the pier in the worst way. Now Miss Pink: That was a terrible pun, but I?ll forgive you if you can answer my question. I didn?t make it up. I?ve been there and I?ve seen the pier. At the time however, the Law wasn?t after me so I just filed its existence away for future reference. It?s the future now but I?ve forgotten where I filed the name. |
| Subject:
Re: Pier in the Thames
From: pinkfreud-ga on 22 Sep 2004 11:05 PDT |
Andy, In addition to using your question as a launching-point for a dreadful pun, I did give this a serious try, and I couldn't find anything for you. I suspect that a Researcher from the UK will have better luck. ~Pink |
| Subject:
Re: Pier in the Thames
From: probonopublico-ga on 22 Sep 2004 11:28 PDT |
Andy, If Pink can't find it with her access to the Delphic Oracle and all the gods that you care to name and then some, then I suggest that a more prosaic methodology is required. Have you tried an on-line booking agency? Or, have you searched using the 'de' directory? All the Best Bryan |
| Subject:
Re: Pier in the Thames
From: voila-ga on 22 Sep 2004 11:36 PDT |
Good gravy, General, I had a feeling that compromising kitty porn would be your undoing. So, how long are you needing sanctuary and should we take up a collection and buy you a hump? I'm thinking you should've stuck with ye olde garden variety froufroutement which only gets you chafed, not chased. I'll consult with my Brit pal, Jim Buoy, and see if we can locate this pier of yours. Touch wood, we can get this 'incident' cleared up before you can say 'quid agitur de matre mea.' And may I say you collect (and promptly lose!) curious snippets of information, Mr. Snollygoster. |
| Subject:
Re: Pier in the Thames
From: beauregard-ga on 22 Sep 2004 12:02 PDT |
Voila: Your mother is involved because I've already asked her and she didn't know the answer, and I find it extremely unlikely that you have a friend named Jim Buoy who knows anything about piers. |
| Subject:
Re: Pier in the Thames
From: voila-ga on 22 Sep 2004 12:08 PDT |
Sorry, sir, I was having Versed-like Famke Janssen flashback. Jim who?? |
| Subject:
Re: Pier in the Thames
From: beauregard-ga on 22 Sep 2004 14:43 PDT |
Voila, Hmmm. You brought up the subjects a) Your mother: 'quid agitur de matre mea.' and b) Jim Buoy. I was only replying, answering your Latin phrase and saying that a man named Buoy probably doesn't know anything about piers. I meant no disrespect. I'm under great stress, as you may imagine. Just now I was convinced that the workmen who are replacing my neighbor's driveway are really the police. Turns out they aren't. |
| Subject:
Re: Pier in the Thames
From: pinkfreud-ga on 22 Sep 2004 14:58 PDT |
Wasn't Jim Buoy a character in "The Waltons"? |
| Subject:
Re: Pier in the Thames
From: voila-ga on 22 Sep 2004 16:19 PDT |
Ahhh, we're just joshin' with ya, General. You know we always like to have fun with our 'regulars.' Your questions are quite tasty and full of naughty bits so it's a pleasure to see your name on the GA scroll. I've been looking for your 'immunity pier' in between correcting reports like ... "the patient is impulsive, noncomplient, confused, disoriented, anosmic agnostic (WTF??)(anosognostic), delusional, and paranoid ..." so I have permanent brain damage from hitting my head on the desk. You draw your curtains, have a smoke and a siesta, and we'll be looking into a relocation plan for ya. I'll even have Mum muck out the bunker in back just in case you need a plan B. She has a strict "no cat porno" policy though. Anyway, rest assured we have our top *and* bottom people on your question. Also, on your behalf, I've contacted Famke Janssen, John Boy Walton, and Camilla Parker Bowles just in case they can provide any clues. In the meantime, we'll entertain you with our particular brand of silliness until your answer comes through. So, did ya ever dye your hair 5RR True Red, rinse it out in the shower but have a reeeellly slow running drain, and return 4 hours later to a scene that looks like an evisceration has taken place in your tub? Scary. Relax, General. Our operators are standing by.... |
| Subject:
Re: Pier in the Thames
From: beauregard-ga on 22 Sep 2004 17:20 PDT |
Voila, I'll sleep well tonight knowing you are on the job. I don't dye my hair, but I do put it up in curler [sic] now and again. I've disguised myself as a nun and am roaming the streets of Greater Detroit. Now and again I pop into an Internet Cafe to communicate with you. I've my ticket to London and my passport safely pinned under my Habit. The cat will be well taken care of until I return after the statute of limitations runs out in 10 years. Until that time I expect to be cold and hungry standing on a pier in the Thames. But I need to find the thing first. Yours in perpetuity, Beauregard Jackson Pickett Coburn |
| Subject:
Re: Pier in the Thames
From: probonopublico-ga on 26 Sep 2004 00:37 PDT |
Great News, Andy I went to London yesterday for the sole purpose of locating the small wooden pier in the Thames that you enquired about. Suitably armed with a powerful telescope and a thermal imaging laser, I hired a powerful craft and ordered the helmsman to sail up and down the City banks until a wooden pier appeared on the horizon. And Voila! Before you could say Pinkfreud there it was. Hewed out of massive chunks of the best Quebracho, it loomed before me. A heavenly choir started and the troup of dancing girls did the Black Bottom ... My cruise director had brought them along to provide some pier end entertainment. However, they already had some pierrots in residence. But was that pier humming! Someone lowered a ladder and we started to climb up. Obviously, I said, 'Ladies first' but after all the dancing girls had made the ascent, they hauled up the ladder, leaving me, the helmsman and my cruise director still on board. Of course, after I had flashed a wad of fifties (all counterfeits), they relented and I joined the happy throng and saw several familiar faces. I enquired about future visiting rights but I was told that it is strictly for disgraced politicians. So, I've still got some work to do. Apparently it's such a success that they're now setting up franchises. The Mississippi, the St Lawrence, the Amazon, the Nile, the Rhine and the Ganges have already been taken. Apparently it's the NEXT BIG THING. |
| Subject:
Re: Pier in the Thames
From: beauregard-ga on 26 Sep 2004 01:20 PDT |
ProBono (may I call you ProBono?) Of course I fully expected a Google-Answerer to make the trip to London as you describe. I would have gone myself but why should I when you would go instead? I must chide you, however, for falling into the sexist trap of allowing women off the boat first. This you should not have done. It?s every man for himself, as I?m wont to say. I?m still absorbing all that you wrote, so I?ll add another comment once done. |
| Subject:
Re: Pier in the Thames
From: beauregard-ga on 26 Sep 2004 01:39 PDT |
Pro (may I call you Pro?): Sadly, I believe you have found an ersatz pier and not my pier at all. I say this because you should have heard a choir of Angels singing Handel?s Hallelujah Chorus. There would have been a shaft of light breaking through the clouds illuminating the pier. So you?ve found a brand-x pier ? just a run-of-the-mill, common pier actually ? and not my Immunity Pier after all. I wonder what characteristic your pier embodies? Maybe it?s a pier where it never rains until after sundown? Or one where the moonlight appears just after 9:00 p.m.? Maybe it?s a pier where, by law, there?s not a more congenial spot for happily-ever-aftering?. (wait. I think I?ve just written a song lyric). And so, our quest continues??. |
| Subject:
Re: Pier in the Thames
From: probonopublico-ga on 26 Sep 2004 07:43 PDT |
Hi, Bo (may I call you Bo?): The Customer is always right! Although there are a thousand or so disgraced politicians in residence who may probably disagree. As you may know, Hitler, sought sanctuary there after WWII. One day, he passed away and was buried at sea. Very hush hush but years later, his skeleton was washed ashore. The experts identified it as Hitler from the silly moustache and the skeleton's arm which was raised in that unmistakable salute. The acid test will be if the shore patrol or the harbor police should ever make a swoop. By the way that's not the correct way to spell 'harbour', is it? Well no, it isn't but then again the Customer is always right! I've now called off the search. Finding one pier was all you specified, so if you want me to find another pier that will cost you another $2.50. Sorry to be so mercenary. The Pro. |
| Subject:
Re: Pier in the Thames
From: beauregard-ga on 26 Sep 2004 08:52 PDT |
Don't forget I've added a $20.00 kicker to the original $2.00. So you stand to make a full $22.00. I don't make that much in a week, so you should count yourself fortunate. And your nome de plume would lead me to believe that you didn't need the income being a top-notch Google Answerer brings in. And just where did you get that nonsense about the customer always being right? In my experience customers are usually as wrong as wrong can be. The phrase should be "Pretend that the customer is always right" or "Let the customer think that you think he's always right". Then as soon as he's left, talk about him. As an aside, I've never asked a Google Question that I just made up. Every question has been real. There really is a word whose meaning is "a furtive rustling beneath the sheets" and there really is a pier such as I've described. Of course the possibility exists that the pier has long since fallen into the Thames (taking the politicians and CEOs with it). It was, after all, 1970 when I last stood on this pier feeling oh so impervious to arrest. |
| Subject:
Re: Pier in the Thames
From: probonopublico-ga on 26 Sep 2004 22:14 PDT |
Hi, Again, Bo Sadly, I am unable to cash in on your kind offer of even a modest payment for my efforts on your behalf because I have just had my 35th Application to become an Authorised Researcher refused ... To Whom It May Concern You must be joking! Don't you dare waste our time again. (Signed) Director of Human Resources With the greatest respect ... Why did you ever quit the pier in the first place? Or, at least, leave some chalk marks on the pavement, etc. so you could have always found it again in case of emergency? The Pro |
| Subject:
Re: Pier in the Thames
From: beauregard-ga on 26 Sep 2004 23:18 PDT |
Oh Dear P, How sad I am for you. Rejection is so demoralizing. Maybe I could send an e-mail and put in a good word for you? But you are correct: I should have had the sense to mark the pier so I could find it again. I did not and I will forever be sorry. Let's consider this subject closed. The pier is lost forever. Amen |
| Subject:
Re: Pier in the Thames
From: steph53-ga on 27 Sep 2004 14:47 PDT |
Ummm.... I wonder, does the "Ark" pass under the pier? |
| Subject:
Re: Pier in the Thames
From: beauregard-ga on 27 Sep 2004 16:13 PDT |
Steph (may I call you Steph), Only the wee-est ark could pass under this pier as it was only a foot or two above the mean level of the Thames. At times, I would imagine, it would be under water itself. |
If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by emailing us at answers-support@google.com with the question ID listed above. Thank you. |
| Search Google Answers for |
| Google Home - Answers FAQ - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy |