Google Answers Logo
View Question
 
Q: Senate Security Committee Testimony circa 1956 ( No Answer,   7 Comments )
Question  
Subject: Senate Security Committee Testimony circa 1956
Category: Reference, Education and News > General Reference
Asked by: probonopublico-ga
List Price: $10.00
Posted: 12 Oct 2004 08:36 PDT
Expires: 14 Oct 2004 02:01 PDT
Question ID: 413668
There was a report in the London Times dated June 8 1956 regarding
Captain John Herbert King who had been sentenced to 10 years in the UK
in 1939 for espionage on behalf of Soviet Russia.

This was the first report of the incident and evidently it was only
then made public following testimony given to the SSC by Isaac Don
Levine, a journalist.

Levine had got his information from Walter Krivitsky, a Soviet
Intelligence officer who had defected in 1937 and who (allegedly)
later committed 'suicide' in Washington.

What Hearings were these and how can I get a copy of the testimonies?

Clarification of Question by probonopublico-ga on 14 Oct 2004 02:01 PDT
Hi, Freddy

Yes, thanks to you, it looks like the Senate Hearing would have been
investigating the Burgess & Maclean Affair.

All the Best!

Bryan
Answer  
There is no answer at this time.

Comments  
Subject: Re: Senate Security Committee Testimony circa 1956
From: fp-ga on 13 Oct 2004 13:58 PDT
 
Bryan, I suppose you have seen this page
http://www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk/SSkrivitsky.htm

and read the book "A Death in Washington" by Gary Kern and Nigel West.

I'll try to find out more.
Subject: Re: Senate Security Committee Testimony circa 1956
From: fp-ga on 13 Oct 2004 14:30 PDT
 
According to 
http://www.angelfire.com/oz/1spy/film.html

in the film "Conspirator" (1949) 
"Robert Taylor plays a British officer feeding the Soviets military
secrets while his wife, Elizabeth Taylor, comes to suspect him.
Taylor's role is modeled after the espionage career of Captain John
Herbert King ..."

I don't quite understand how Taylor's role could have been modelled
after King, if it was only in 1956 that his story was made public.

John Herbert King not mentioned by
http://uk.imdb.com/title/tt0041260/
Subject: Re: Senate Security Committee Testimony circa 1956
From: fp-ga on 13 Oct 2004 14:56 PDT
 
Donald Cameron Watt, "(John) Herbert King: A Soviet Source in the
Foreign Office", Intelligence and National Security, vol. Ill, no. 4
(1988), p. 62.

http://books.myweb.ru/cgi-bin/new/library.cgi?PageType=READBOOK&BookID=1510&PageNo=10

Index to Intelligence and National Security:
http://frode.home.cern.ch/frode/crypto/INSindex.html
http://frode.home.cern.ch/frode/crypto/INS.html

Publishers:
http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/titles/02684527.asp

This article may have the answer to your question. Apparently not
available online, but the British Library has a copy.
Subject: Re: Senate Security Committee Testimony circa 1956
From: fp-ga on 13 Oct 2004 15:08 PDT
 
Bryan, have you seen these documents?
http://foia.fbi.gov/spies.htm

Isaac Don Levine:
http://foia.fbi.gov/foiaindex/levine_isaac.htm
Subject: Re: Senate Security Committee Testimony circa 1956
From: probonopublico-ga on 13 Oct 2004 22:20 PDT
 
Hi, Again, Freddy

I have already got 'Death in Washington' which explores Krivitsky's
death. I've also got a lot of other stuff on Mr K.

Captain King was fingered in Sept 1939 by Isaac Don Levine who acted
as a spokesman for Krivitsky. So, King's role was known by Levine
which explains the Hollywood version.

Interestingly, King was only revealed in the UK after Levine had
testified at the Senate hearing. Levine had testified that King had
been taken to the Tower of London and 'quietly shot'. Hence, the
Foreign Office denial.

I'll check out your other links later.

Many thanks, again.

All the Best

Bryan
Subject: Re: Senate Security Committee Testimony circa 1956
From: fp-ga on 14 Oct 2004 01:07 PDT
 
Isaac Don Levine (1892-1981), Papers, ca. 1914-1978; 138 boxes

http://specialcollections.library.emory.edu/guides-jewish.html
Subject: Re: Senate Security Committee Testimony circa 1956
From: probonopublico-ga on 14 Oct 2004 01:49 PDT
 
Hi, Again, Freddy

I have now checked your other links. Many thanks.

Unfortunately, nothing significant has emerged.

The FBI file on Blunt was so heavily weeded that it was meaningless.

I would bet that the coded letter that supposedly led to the unmasking
of Maclean was a cover story. More likely it was the Venona stuff that
did the trick.

Krivitsky (via Levine) also identified another spy in September 1939
whose description roughly corresponded with Maclean, but without
giving the name.

It seems likely that Levine was testifying at a Senate hearing on the
Burgess & Maclean Affair.

All the Best

Bryan

Important Disclaimer: Answers and comments provided on Google Answers are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Google does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. Please read carefully the Google Answers Terms of Service.

If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by emailing us at answers-support@google.com with the question ID listed above. Thank you.
Search Google Answers for
Google Answers  


Google Home - Answers FAQ - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy