![]() |
|
![]() | ||
|
Subject:
tax abatements
Category: Reference, Education and News Asked by: christianehawkins-ga List Price: $12.00 |
Posted:
18 Oct 2004 11:01 PDT
Expires: 17 Nov 2004 10:01 PST Question ID: 416513 |
I am working on a paper that looks at the competition that occurs between cities using tax abatements as relocation incentives. Why does Boenig decide to locate in Chicago rather than Dallas? I need background info on current tax abatements used by various localities?where did they come from? I am hoping to use the state of Texas and Texas cities as a case study. I am particularly concerned with the use of municipal funds to attract large employers. For the most part, the studies I have found focus on the economic impact of these tax abatements. How much did they cost? How effective were they in broadening a city?s tax base? Do they have an overall positive impact? The thing I am really concerned with, though, is the political dimension of tax abatements. If they have repeatedly been proven to be ineffective or to at least have a nominal impact, why do politicians insist on using them as tools to attract corporations to their cities? A successful answer to this question will include historical material on the originations of these abatements and also information that would be useful in examining the political aspects and processes used in determining whether or not to use tax abatements to attract companies. |
![]() | ||
|
There is no answer at this time. |
![]() | ||
|
There are no comments at this time. |
If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by emailing us at answers-support@google.com with the question ID listed above. Thank you. |
Search Google Answers for |
Google Home - Answers FAQ - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy |