![]() |
|
![]() | ||
|
Subject:
Measurement of Amps without direct contact
Category: Science Asked by: yournicknamehere-ga List Price: $25.00 |
Posted:
18 Oct 2004 22:39 PDT
Expires: 17 Nov 2004 21:39 PST Question ID: 416852 |
How to build a non-contact (term I just made up, but seems accurate)ammeter. More specifically there is a variety of ammeter that has a ring that can be opened. After the ring is opened, 1 conductor of an AC circuit is placed within the ring. The ring is then allowed to close. The device then gives an accurate measurement of the current electrical draw on said circuit. Please see an example (cheap but functional) of this type of device at: http://www.radioshack.com/product.asp?catalog%5Fname=CTLG&product%5Fid=22-602 For a project we are trying to build a functioning (repeatable measurements) version of the tool. A standard multitester may be used to interpret reading, but the actual "ring" or whatever it is must be created by us. It does not need to open as described above. If possible, I would also appreciate any info on what factors determine the sensativity of the device. Thanks in advance | |
|
![]() | ||
|
There is no answer at this time. |
![]() | ||
|
Subject:
Re: Measurement of Amps without direct contact
From: cheyuta1939-ga on 19 Oct 2004 05:59 PDT |
Dear yournicknamehere, In affect what you are looking for is what is known as a current transformer. There are standard classes for these instruments which ensure accuracy and repeatability. for Current transformer design basics see: http://leeh.ee.tut.fi/transformer/tra351.htm There is more information available at: http://www.ecmweb.com/mag/electric_dont_left_short/ IEEE 52, Application Guide for Grounding of Instrument Transformer Secondary Circuits and Cases. But please remember that when the primary circuit is "ON", the secondary measuring circuit should never be kept open! If you propose to use a multimeter for measuring secondary current, use a shoting link in this circuit. With best wishes. |
Subject:
Re: Measurement of Amps without direct contact
From: livioflores-ga on 19 Oct 2004 06:44 PDT |
This link could be helpful to you: http://www.kilowattclassroom.com/Archive/AN0008.pdf |
Subject:
Re: Measurement of Amps without direct contact
From: hfshaw-ga on 19 Oct 2004 13:08 PDT |
The common name for the device you are looking for is a "current clamp", also known as a non-contact ammeter. The physics of these devices have been described in a couple of journal articles: D.C. Henry, Enhancing electromagnetism experiments with clamp-on ammeters. American Journal of Physics, Vol. 69, No. 1, pp. 76?78, January 2001 (http://scitation.aip.org/journals/doc/AJPIAS-ft/vol_69/iss_1/76_1.html#R7) P. Heller, American Journal of Physics Volume 60, no. 1, pp. 17-25. (http://scitation.aip.org/getabs/servlet/GetabsServlet?key=AJPIAS&prog=spinref&id=AJPIAS000060000001000017000001&idtype=cvips&linksmith=yes) Briefly, these devices work beause the AC current in the wire being measured creates a varying magnetic field around the wire. The magnetic field will, in turn, induce a current in a coil (the loop of the ammeter), which allows one to infer the current in the first wire. The accuracy of these devices is not that great (a couple of percent), and they are typically used for measuring fairly high currents. A more sophisticated (and more sensitive) version of the clamp ammeter is based on the Hall Effect -- the phenomenon by which a potential difference is created perpendicular to the direction of current flow in a conductor in a magnetic field. A complete design, including parts list, for such a device that can be hooked up to a standard multimeter can be found at: http://www.siliconchip.com.au/cms/A_30669/article.html |
Subject:
Re: Measurement of Amps without direct contact
From: guzzi-ga on 19 Oct 2004 19:07 PDT |
In addition to the excellent comments, easy way is to feed a single turn of wire round the central core of a small mains transformer -- monitoring with an ammeter on the primary winding. You will unfortunately get quite a large voltage on the secondary though so it is best to strip the secondary off first. This is quite easy with split bobbin designs. Alternatively one could strip the primary and monitor on the secondary which would give you a much higher reading. If you can dissemble the laminations you can make a clamp-on device. Best |
If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by emailing us at answers-support@google.com with the question ID listed above. Thank you. |
Search Google Answers for |
Google Home - Answers FAQ - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy |