Google Answers Logo
View Question
 
Q: World war 2: Political, social and economic significance ( No Answer,   2 Comments )
Question  
Subject: World war 2: Political, social and economic significance
Category: Reference, Education and News > General Reference
Asked by: mrsifter-ga
List Price: $8.00
Posted: 22 Oct 2004 00:26 PDT
Expires: 29 Oct 2004 03:19 PDT
Question ID: 418399
Why is World War 2 considered so important? Explain the political,
social and economic significance of the War.

Looking for info on this, preferably in essay form would be best. up
to about 1500 words thats all. Thanks

Clarification of Question by mrsifter-ga on 22 Oct 2004 00:28 PDT
Just wanted to add that under those headings some areas that could be
discussed are for political - the cold war, social - women in the
workforce. Areas like that
Answer  
There is no answer at this time.

Comments  
Subject: Re: World war 2: Political, social and economic significance
From: probonopublico-ga on 22 Oct 2004 00:38 PDT
 
Politically, Socialism (in all its hues) ousted Fascism (in all its hues);

Socially, this meant the erosion of the Landed Gentry and the
ascendancy of the Moneyed Classes. This gave opportunities for people
in the lowest strata to move up through the ranks. Hitherto, only
coquettes enjoyed this upward mobility.

Economically, this meant Globalisation so that stuff could be farmed
out from the Developed Countries (who held the purse strings) to the
Lesser types.

Without these changes, how could we now enjoy the best of everything?

Utopia!
Subject: Re: World war 2: Political, social and economic significance
From: frde-ga on 22 Oct 2004 08:59 PDT
 
The First World War was between roughly equivalent Nations.
A bit, locally, like the Boer War - like siblings scrapping.

The results were (in my opinion) a throwback to savagery, Stalinism
(not Communism) and the NSDAP (note: not Fascism - that is a
jingoistic term borrowed from the Romans - that preceded, but had
nothing to do with Hitler).

The reversion to primitive tribal outlooks, coupled with rather
advanced weopons, capable of attacking remote civilians (far better
than the odd Zeppelin) resulted in 'Total War' rather than defined
fronts and victims.

In the past, conflict was relatively confined to a defined area,
unpleasant for the people in the wrong place at the wrong time, but in
essence gladiatorial.

In the more distant past, warfare was 'invasion' or 'migration',
(excluding a spot of mugging).

The Cold War has little to do with WWII
- ditto women - they cracked the yoke in WWI

The social (if you mean Class) thing was pretty fragmented by WWI
(shortage of officers), and had possibly been already sorted out by
Britain's new Empire and the expansion of grammar schools.

However, WWII did retain one vital characteristic of earlier warfare,
as the USA was involved, and could act as a supplier of food,
munitions and corpses.

I suggest that you build up your essay using total warfare as the
theme, and then demolish it in the penultimate paragraph.

Important Disclaimer: Answers and comments provided on Google Answers are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Google does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. Please read carefully the Google Answers Terms of Service.

If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by emailing us at answers-support@google.com with the question ID listed above. Thank you.
Search Google Answers for
Google Answers  


Google Home - Answers FAQ - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy