Yolira --
There are two common ways to figure this problem out: one using NPV of
cash flows and the other using Internal Rates of Return, trying to get
the 5 lease payments to yield an IRR of 14%.
I'm going to use the former because IRR gets hidden by lots of things
when you use a spreadsheet.
The first thing that you should do is set up an Income Statement to
account for cash flows. You'll start with Year 0 -- using that to
represent what happens TODAY. Year 1 will be cash flows at the end of
that year -- and so on through Year 5. I've timed depreciation to
MATCH income because while you and I pay taxes at the end of the year,
a corporation is paying them quarterly.
You'll see the income statement here for all 5 years -- but note that
there's no lease payment:
PV Lease: Income Statement
http://www.mooneyevents.com/pvlease1.xls
In the above spreadsheet, which should appear in your browser AND be
downloadable to your own system, you'll see that there are NO lease
payments.
However, when we enter lease payments -- so it's not surprising that
there's a BIG negative NPV to all of the cash flows.
What's our objective now? Add in equal annual lease payments on line
5 to get an NPV of zero! We've already figured in our minimum hurdle
of 14%. Now we want an NPV of each year's cash flows to get back to
zero -- which is the precise definition of IRR:
"Intermediate Financial Management," (Ramana Sonti)
http://business.kent.edu/courses/spring02/Fin/36054/lecture_notes/chapter6.htm
"An easy way of thinking about IRR is to define it as the rate that
forces the NPV of the project to zero," notes Prof. Sonti.
---
Let's see what happens if we make the lease payments simply match the
depreciation, so that there's no income each of the first 4 years:
http://www.mooneyevents.com/pvlease2.xls
Not surprisingly, the NPV is still strongly negative (but it gives us
a chance to check the integrity of our calculations).
----
So let's try to generate some profit here by making the lease payments
$80,000 per year:
http://www.mooneyevents.com/pvlease3.xls
We're still running a negative NPV because of the enormous first-year
outlay and the high discount rate of 14%!
----
It's not until you get monthly lease payments over the $120,500 level
that the NPV goes above zero:
http://www.mooneyevents.com/pvlease4.xls
Why is it this way?
1. the high up-front capital outlay
2. the conservative straight-line depreciation (today's tax law is
much more liberal, allowing a double-declining balance AND an
investment tax credit)
3. and the high 14% return rate (with a prime rate around 5%, leasing
companies today would seek something like a 9% return).
As always, if there are any questions about what's been done here,
please contact the researcher with a clarification request before
rating this answer.
Best regards,
Omnivorous-GA |