|
|
Subject:
write in
Category: Relationships and Society > Politics Asked by: hailstorm-ga List Price: $2.00 |
Posted:
01 Nov 2004 00:30 PST
Expires: 04 Nov 2004 15:06 PST Question ID: 422812 |
Why is being on the ballot such an important thing for a presidential candidate? For such an important occasion as the quadrennial presidential election, wouldn't a voter be willing to take an additional 15 seconds to actually write out the names of their presidential and vice presidential choices to choose the candidate that represents them the best? Are there American voters who are actually not aware that they are allowed to write in anybody that meets the qualifications for election? (natural born citizen, at least 35 years of age, etc.) Looking forward to the 2008 election, when I can finally vote for the most deserving candidate...myself! | |
|
|
There is no answer at this time. |
|
Subject:
Re: write in
From: probonopublico-ga on 01 Nov 2004 00:51 PST |
Well, if I had a vote, I would certainly vote for you at the 2008 Election, if I knew your real name, which I don't. So pray tell me how can you expect anyone to know who's name to write in unless such a person has indicated his/her preparedness to do such a silly job? |
Subject:
Re: write in
From: hailstorm-ga on 01 Nov 2004 03:04 PST |
Everyone knows Ralph Nader...yet his supporters are desperately trying to get him on the ballot in as many states as possible. And *I* am thinking of making a run for the presidency in 2008 for the not-yet-created Expats For America party... |
Subject:
Re: write in
From: probonopublico-ga on 01 Nov 2004 04:17 PST |
Huh ... So, who is this Ralph Nader? |
Subject:
Re: write in
From: hailstorm-ga on 01 Nov 2004 05:04 PST |
He's the old guy who had a heart attack on the side of the road when you drove past him in your CorvAir the other day... |
Subject:
Re: write in
From: frde-ga on 01 Nov 2004 05:31 PST |
Nader is a Methuselah - he probably did sterling work in the 1960s Google: "Unsafe At Any Speed" nader for his opus |
Subject:
Re: write in
From: probonopublico-ga on 01 Nov 2004 06:25 PST |
Oh THAT Nader! Well, if I'd known it was YOU who was busy rifling his wallet, I sure would have stopped. Out of courtesy. Good Luck with your 2008 Campaign. I'll come and sing at your inauguration ... For my usual fee. |
Subject:
Re: write in
From: hailstorm-ga on 01 Nov 2004 14:01 PST |
Well, how else am I going to get the money to fuel my rabid penny stock habit? I penciled you in for the singing gig in 2009. The campaign theme song will be "Karma Chameleon" by Culture Club. Please dress appropriately... So, anybody care to try and answer the question? |
Subject:
Re: write in
From: nelson-ga on 01 Nov 2004 18:31 PST |
Ralph Nader is the guy partially responsible for all the problems in the 2000 election. He should just go away rather than messing everything up again. |
Subject:
Re: write in
From: hailstorm-ga on 02 Nov 2004 00:18 PST |
Why is he responsible? Because over 97,000 people preferred him to Gore or Bush? What about the 16,000+ votes that Harry Browne received from otherwise potential Republicans in Florida that year? If America wants to call itself a democracy, it needs to accept and embrace the fact that there are more than just two viewpoints. |
Subject:
Re: write in
From: politicalguru-ga on 02 Nov 2004 00:32 PST |
Interesting, Hailstorm, because I had the opposite question today. Due to my immense support of the Charles Jay/Marilyn Chambers (Personal Choice Party, and see my comment here <http://answers.google.com/answers/threadview?id=421696>), I began to think: What's the use of being a Presidential candidate if you're not running in all 50 States? There is no chance of being elected anyway, and because of the structure of the American political system, also not much chance that the elections would bring their ideas or ideology closer to the public. Why run as a write-in or with a small party, that is not even on the ballot in all 50 States? |
Subject:
Re: write in
From: probonopublico-ga on 02 Nov 2004 00:59 PST |
Great point, PG. At the end of the day, only one of the two main candidates will become Prez. I would have thought that the rational voter would have wanted his/her vote to count. The other candidates are either on an ego trip or living on another planet. I guess this is just one of the cosmetics of the supposedly democratic system: the truth is that there are only two viable candidates and whoever wins you'll get the same basic product with a different package and brand name. Well consensus politics have been around for a long time and they do seem to work, so do we need all this razmataz? It leaves me cold. Long Live the King! Yes ... I do mean Elvis. |
Subject:
Re: write in
From: hailstorm-ga on 02 Nov 2004 03:03 PST |
Of course you don't need to be on the ballot in all 50 states. In fact, in an election this close, all you really need is to be on the ballot in one state. Imagine that a person of Arnold Schwartzenegger's stature (not Arnold himself, unfortunately, because he's not a natural born citizen) decided to run for president, and dedicated his efforts exclusively to California. If our Arnie stand-in took the 55 electoral votes of California, he would almost surely prevent either George Bush or John Kerry from claiming a majority of the electoral votes, meaning that the House of Representatives would elect the next president, at which point anything can happen... |
Subject:
Re: write in
From: probonopublico-ga on 02 Nov 2004 04:02 PST |
Wow, Hailey, I never realised THAT! OK, so let's start planning your campaign for 2008 ... My guess is that with all the brainpower available PLUS Your hard earned fortune ... (from the Penny Shares thing) Sunny Cal is the way forward ... Let's do it! Of course, we would still have to fix the House of Reps and they go for the Prohibition Party candidate after all. Risky? |
Subject:
Re: write in
From: hailstorm-ga on 02 Nov 2004 06:18 PST |
If elected, I promise that my Cabinet will be composed entirely of Google Answers Researchers! And Missy and Pinkfreud will be first in line as my choice of appointments to the Supreme Court! |
Subject:
Re: write in
From: probonopublico-ga on 02 Nov 2004 06:54 PST |
Sorry, Hailey You have just lost my vote. ONLY Researchers???? You did used to have some friends among us commoners. Just like a politico! You are all the same: after getting our votes with BIG promises, you now pass out all the favours to your friends. Sadly Disillusioned. A Committed Ex-Haler. |
Subject:
Re: write in
From: frde-ga on 02 Nov 2004 08:10 PST |
Arnie might not be such a bad idea Reagan was a 'B' Movie actor, yet I have a certain respect for some of the things he did - especially the 'Mini Memos' Imagine an 'A' Movie actor - with total 'script control' The Third time stuff was just invented to stiff FDR, and with a huge Hispanic population the 'Not Born Here' rule is very amendable. |
Subject:
Re: write in
From: hailstorm-ga on 02 Nov 2004 15:44 PST |
I also promise to make probonopublico Ambassador to Ghana! |
Subject:
Re: write in
From: pinkfreud-ga on 02 Nov 2004 20:36 PST |
>> And Missy and Pinkfreud will be first in line as my choice >> of appointments to the Supreme Court! I always fantasized about being a member of The Supremes. Missy and I will probably have to duke it out over who gets to be Diana Ross. |
Subject:
Re: write in
From: probonopublico-ga on 02 Nov 2004 22:33 PST |
Well, OK then, I'm mollified! But, of course, there were THREE Supremes ... Don't tell me that we have yet another Prez who can't count? Or are you faking it, as part of your image? |
Subject:
Re: write in
From: pinkfreud-ga on 02 Nov 2004 23:42 PST |
Good point, Bryan. I was really hoping that Hailstorm himself would put on a bouffant wig and sing backup with Missy while I do the Miss Ross thing and hog the spotlight. If not, perhaps we can coax Archae0pteryx to take up the microphone. I bet she warbles like... um... like an extinct bird. |
Subject:
Re: write in
From: probonopublico-ga on 03 Nov 2004 03:54 PST |
Sorry, Pink, but Archae0pteryx would not be eligible. I think that Haily has made it perfectly clear that ALL the plum jobs will be handed out to Researchers and despite her undoubted talents I am afraid that the mellifluous Archae0pteryx does not qualify as such. For your information, Pink, the names of ALL Researchers are now underlined in blue or is it cyan? This indicates that they are HYPERLINKED. Whatever that may mean. Maybe they are on something that makes them hyper? So, please think again. Remember, we need THREE FEMALE RESEARCHERS who can sing! (Having heard Kriswrite-ga, I think we rule her out.) |
Subject:
Re: write in
From: politicalguru-ga on 03 Nov 2004 09:05 PST |
I can sing, if we all preform in my shower. |
Subject:
Re: write in
From: probonopublico-ga on 03 Nov 2004 10:08 PST |
Gottverdammich Politicalguru! What would your husband say if he caught you with the Ambassador for Ghana in your shower? |
If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by emailing us at answers-support@google.com with the question ID listed above. Thank you. |
Search Google Answers for |
Google Home - Answers FAQ - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy |