![]() |
|
![]() | ||
|
Subject:
Judicial permission to wiretap: why is it hard for Bush to get?
Category: Relationships and Society > Law Asked by: cwd-ga List Price: $10.00 |
Posted:
13 Jan 2006 14:06 PST
Expires: 12 Feb 2006 14:06 PST Question ID: 433035 |
There's been so much in the news about wiretapping without court permission. What I haven't found mentioned yet is why Bush doesn't just get judicial ok's to wiretap, if the people he's after seem so guilty. How tough or how slow could getting permission really be that he can't do this legally? |
![]() | ||
|
There is no answer at this time. |
![]() | ||
|
Subject:
Re: Judicial permission to wiretap: why is it hard for Bush to get?
From: myoarin-ga on 13 Jan 2006 16:35 PST |
This is just a free comment, no "answer", and also just a personal understanding of the situation. I think that wiretapping has to be selective, i.e., that there has to demonstrated reason to tap someone's telephone - what the court order establishes. The problem was/is that the wiretapping was a fishing expedition, tapping phones of persons who just had "funny" names, invading their privacy (a constitutional right). |
Subject:
Re: Judicial permission to wiretap: why is it hard for Bush to get?
From: markvmd-ga on 13 Jan 2006 18:31 PST |
The 1978 Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act actually allows for circumstances where investigators can go get permission to eavesdrop after the fact. The defense put forth by the White House is that modern technology has raced ahead of the law. Huh? If you can get permission after the fact, what's the big deal? That's where part of the problem lies. A gray area of the law is how to treat data that move through the US that doesn't originate or end here. If a person in Korea emails another person in Sri Lanka and some of the data packets move through the US, can they be sniffed legally? |
Subject:
Re: Judicial permission to wiretap: why is it hard for Bush to get?
From: elids-ga on 14 Jan 2006 15:24 PST |
"A gray area of the law is how to treat data that move through the US that doesn't originate or end here. If a person in Korea emails another person in Sri Lanka and some of the data packets move through the US, can they be sniffed legally?" From what I understand the answer is Yes. As it was explained to me, you need permission to intercept the packets within a private network, you do not need permission to do so on the net. Not only can the government do it, you can legally do it as there is no law against it, and until there is one specifically barring people from doing so, it can be done legally. But the original question was about phone wiretapping, and there are laws making that illegal without a court order. A gray area would be if you were using the phone over a net carrier such as Vonage, that would be something the courts would have to determine. |
If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by emailing us at answers-support@google.com with the question ID listed above. Thank you. |
Search Google Answers for |
Google Home - Answers FAQ - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy |