Clarification of Answer by
voila-ga
on
10 Aug 2002 12:42 PDT
Hello again Scholar,
First, apologies for not having seen your questions sooner. I will
do my absolute best to clarify this information, but I hope you will
consider reposting your question for one of our legal eagles regarding
laws governing disclosure by insurance companies. I must admit this
is not my métier.
From what I've read thus far on this issue, there does not seem to be
legislation in place for reciprocity of information from an insurance
company -- outside of filing suit against them. My suggestion would
be to send a certified, return receipt requested letter of inquiry to
your state insurance commissioner {http://www.naic.org/splash.htm}
Click "consumers," from next page click "CIS" (Consumer Information
Source). I would detail the specifics of your situation and let him/
her advise you on what recourse you have. If you feel your civil
rights have been violated, I'd urge you to address these with your
state's attorney general and/or congressional representative. {http://
www.house.gov/}
With regard insurance companies declaring "open season" on
policyholders, I'll attempt to take the personal element out of the
insurability/rating equation. Insurance companies look at our health
as a shareholder would in assessing a company's stock. Is this a
robust organization or one riddled with viruses and bad balance
sheets? How is their ethics portfolio and assets to liability ratio?
Like shareholders, insurance companies are looking to make a profit
on their share of 'you.' But as stockholders, many people go to great
lengths to ensure a company is on firm foundation or just to hedge
their investment. Some even go so far as to risk fines and/or jail
time by resorting to insider trading.
Are insurance companies doing a bit of insider trading with our
medical information? It seems like a fine line there. I suppose
everyone must come to their own conclusion on that question. I did
find this interesting article on GIS technology.
{http://www.findarticles.com/cf_0/m0EDM/1998_Nov/53366323/p1/article.jhtml}
"As GIS data become more readily available, however, and can be more
easily combined with other information, it is easy to see how they can
be misused. Your auto insurance company, for example, could raise your
rates because you live within two miles of a dangerous intersection --
whether you have ever had an accident or not. Eventually, health
insurance companies may cross-reference information about heavily
polluted locations, such as Super Fund Sites, against your past
addresses. They could then charge you more for insurance because they
believe that where you lived as a child puts you at greater risk for
cancer."
As far as companies forcing individuals to authorize release of
information outside of their MIB file, people have gotten quite
creative in this regard. Check out this gentleman's advice from this
website. {http://www.martylyons.com.Privacy.html}
"As most insurance companies use your Social Security number to track
your medical information, a request can now be sent to the Medical
Information Bureau, which tracks health data on 15 million Americans,
for a copy of your file. Once that is obtained, they can now write
letters in your name (with signature, see below) to each hospital, to
get complete copies of your entire medical history. When opening
insurance accounts, remember you are NOT required to supply your
Social Security number -- simply write on the application "not
required by law" across that area on the form, followed by "assign
unique number"; I have never been denied insurance by doing this, and
have always been assigned a unique number by the provider."
Another way medical records can be obtained, which I failed to address
in my initial answer, is through a subpoena. If you are involved in a
court case of any kind, your medical and/or psychiatric records may be
brought before the court. This would also be something you might
address in your letter to your state officials so that may better
guide you.
My advice would be to read any "blanket authorizations" very carefully
and know what you're signed. These notices are usually in microprint
so carry a pocket magnifying glass at all times. Rather than signing
one of these blanket documents, I would ask if there is a limited or
edited waiver you may sign instead.
http://www.bullybusters.org/home/twd/bb/legal/
(archived under "medpriv" and "cyberpriv") Many people authorize
these documents without really knowing the ramifications or options
before signing so I'm glad you've asked this question.
Scholar, outside of paying in cash/out of pocket for all your medical
care and
prescriptions, I do not see any way *not* to leave a paper trail of
our medical history. It is indeed a dilemma for many and I hope that
the HIPAA regulations are a step in the right direction and not the
devil in disguise. We shall see, won't we.
National Center for Policy Analysis:
http://www.ncpa.org/
Institute for Health Freedom:
http://forhealthfreedom.org/Publications/Privacy/
Recommendations from AARP:
http://www.aarp.org/bulletin/mar00/privacy.html
Excerpt from "Database Nation" by Simson Garfinkel:
http://commons.somewhere.com/rre/2000/RRE.Database.Nation.html
National Workrights Institute: (some scary stuff
here)http://www.workrights.org/issue_medical/mp_legislative_brief.html
Gee, Scholar, I hope I haven't muddied the waters or given you too
much to digest with this extra information, but your specific
questions made me look at this issue from many different aspects.
Again, thank you for joining us at Google Answers and please feel free
to post a legal question to our experts.
Google search words:
medical history+blanket authorization
medical history+misused
consumer rights+medical information+disputes
medical information+disputes
collecting medical information
patient bill of rights+medical information
privacy+personal medical information
state insurance commissioners
federal government+state representative
Best wishes,
V