|
|
Subject:
Human Capital
Category: Reference, Education and News > Teaching and Research Asked by: seahawksfan-ga List Price: $10.00 |
Posted:
01 Dec 2004 11:18 PST
Expires: 31 Dec 2004 11:18 PST Question ID: 436699 |
I need to be referred to literature that indicates how employees are now considered "human capital" and how that has changed from various historical perspectives on employees. Specifically I am looking to compare historical and contemporary theorists to indicate how the worker and employee has been transformed into an asset that must be recruited and retained. Past theorists should include Adam Smith etc. |
|
There is no answer at this time. |
|
Subject:
Re: Human Capital
From: neilzero-ga on 06 Dec 2004 08:11 PST |
We are fast approching a condition in which computer programs and robotics can perform most of the functions of average employees. Average employees will be available cheap ssoon. What companies need now is employees who can out-perform the computer and robotics, by makong decisions which are close to optimum most of the time. When they think they have such an empkoyee, retention is a top priority as they may have to hire thousands before find another human that skilful. Neil |
If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by emailing us at answers-support@google.com with the question ID listed above. Thank you. |
Search Google Answers for |
Google Home - Answers FAQ - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy |