![]() |
|
![]() | ||
|
Subject:
Enterprise software upgrade frequency.
Category: Computers > Software Asked by: conchur-ga List Price: $100.00 |
Posted:
02 Dec 2004 08:44 PST
Expires: 20 Dec 2004 03:04 PST Question ID: 437104 |
How often are enterprise software applications upgraded by the user? The question is not about the frequency of major version releases of that software by vendors, rather how often are they applied by the customer? So for example if a company installs an application such as SAP, running on top of Oracle, how often will new versions of the software be applied? Or another example, how often have microsoft issued a major new windows release and what is the actual frequency with which companies upgrade. For instance MS issued Windows 95, 98, 2000, XP etc. however not all companies took all upgrades, some skipped upgrades. So with respect to enterprise applications such as CRM, ERP, SCM, what is the average time between major upgrades? A second related question is "what is the lifetime of an average software installation"? |
![]() | ||
|
There is no answer at this time. |
![]() | ||
|
Subject:
Re: Enterprise software upgrade frequency.
From: ranjeet_rain-ga on 03 Dec 2004 10:52 PST |
This is indeed true. The life time of a software version at the end user's end is much longer than it is at the Vendor. If we take the example of Microsoft only, MS has come up with not less than a dozen major verion changes in the Window OS itself. Windows 95 to 96 to 97 to 98 (yes there was a Windows 96 as well). Then again, Windows NT to to Window ME to Windows 2000 to Windows XP to 2003 and soon to come up with Longhorn. Lets for a moment foget diff OSs and just say that these are major version changes of the same software. Has this chnage over really taken place in reality? No it has not. Most of end users still use Windows 98 (despite MS's announcement to end supporting the OS). Windows ME is used only by the people who were unfortunate to have got the OS preinstalled on their laptop. A server platform switchover is even more unlikely. I see a lot of Windows NT 4.0 still running. Simply becasue, organizations cant afford to make frequent changes to their "infrastructure*. Once installed it will remain there. Add to that the know how. New technology also means for them training the staff (and staff in all parts of teh globe, doesn't welcome a change whole heatedly, you leiterally have to push them). Investment in a new techgnology is one of the most carefull made decisions. Larger the impact on the organization, the more the debate. Clearly, the life span of a software installation at the real site is much more than it is at the software vendor. |
If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by emailing us at answers-support@google.com with the question ID listed above. Thank you. |
Search Google Answers for |
Google Home - Answers FAQ - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy |