![]() |
|
![]() | ||
|
Subject:
Legitamacy and Integrity of UK Tax Avoidance scheme
Category: Business and Money Asked by: cergon-ga List Price: $100.00 |
Posted:
28 Jan 2006 14:34 PST
Expires: 14 Feb 2006 06:26 PST Question ID: 438716 |
At least a rudimentary understanding of the UK tax framework may be helpful when answering this question. The answers to this question will be interesting to anybody with an interest in UK tax law / practice. A) I am seeking adverse information about a tax avoidance scheme operated under the brands `Kinsella Solutions` (http://www.kinsellasolutions.com/) and `Tek Pay` (http://www.tekpay.com/). These names are brands ? the companies are in fact part of the same group (call the contact numbers ? speak to the same person etc.). I should emphasise that under United Kingdom law, tax avoidance is legal ? though tax evasion is not. The reason for my enquiry is to ensure the legitimacy of the scheme offered, and the integrity of those operating it. I am considering using one of these schemes. To qualify adverse information: Court cases against either of these companies ? or their operators - by either members (former, or otherwise) of the the scheme(s); Court cases against these companies, or scheme members, by HM Revenue and Customs (http://www.hmrc.gov.uk); Evidence of generally ?bad experiences? published by scheme members I have purchased some information about Kinsella Solutions from the companies house web site (http://www.companieshouse.gov.uk), and I can provide this on request (contains names of directors etc.) B) A secondary question is about the statement on Kinsella Solutions website, ?Issues resulting from the ?Dextra? case are dealt with?. This relates to a case against Dextra Accessories and Employment Benefit Trusts. I would like to know what measures Kinsella and TekPay have taken to differentiate their schemes from this situation, and if this reconciles with Inland Revenue accepted practice. C) Also, the 2004 Budget made it a legal requirement for tax avoidance schemes to register with the Revenue ? is it possible to discover if Kinsella/TekPay have done this, or are they not classed as avoidance schemes? I can provide documentation about how the scheme these companies sell operates, if such information would be helpful. A quick overview of the reason for using such schemes can be found at http://www.ir35calc.co.uk |
![]() | ||
|
There is no answer at this time. |
![]() | ||
|
Subject:
Re: Legitamacy and Integrity of UK Tax Avoidance scheme
From: thinktankltd-ga on 31 Jan 2006 08:33 PST |
I'm not sure of the ins and outs of this company but I do know that the Channel Islands are a tax haven. On first glance the company look ok to me and seem ligitimate. It is a known thing that people from the UK save their money or open up businesses in the islands the same way as they do Switzerland. whether this same scheme will work in the US is a different matter as tax laws there are inclusive and there are no tax havens... maybe you need to move to an island... Hope this is helpfull. |
Subject:
Re: Legitamacy and Integrity of UK Tax Avoidance scheme
From: cergon-ga on 31 Jan 2006 10:18 PST |
I am a UK resident.. The use of the scheme proposed does rely on a degree of trust (in the non financial sense!), and seeking adverse information about the company and those involved in its operation is quite sensible. The records from Companies House do show those involved have been operating in the financial services for some time. However, I have not had the chance to research them or their companies thanks to lack of disposable time (thus my post on Google Answers).... Their have been a spate of court cases against offshore companies / trusts (or more precisely, the users of them) ? and I am interested if they have been involved in any of this action (and if yes, what the outcome was). The schemes do offer a way for money to renter the UK ? so it is not really about off shore wealth accumulation. To do that, Sovereign Group [http://www.sovereigngroup.com/] offer quite dynamic solutions. In relation to B and C: Wikipedia offers a superficial insight into the laws at: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Taxation_in_the_United_Kingdom http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Furniss_v._Dawson http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IRC_v._Ramsay The scheme states it has taken action as a result of other court cases (Dextra) ? but I would obviously like to know what this action was, and if the action reconciles with current Inland Revenue rules (thus questions B and C). Filling in the registration form for these companies commits you to nothing, and they provide an information pack containing the full workings of the scheme. To quote: ?JOIN US If you would like to have more information or want to join,click on the link below.? |
If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by emailing us at answers-support@google.com with the question ID listed above. Thank you. |
Search Google Answers for |
Google Home - Answers FAQ - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy |