![]() |
|
|
| Subject:
Leasehold vs Freehold (UK property law)
Category: Miscellaneous Asked by: dogsbollocks-ga List Price: $10.00 |
Posted:
07 Dec 2004 09:40 PST
Expires: 06 Jan 2005 09:40 PST Question ID: 439404 |
What's the average price difference between LH / FH in the UK ? Asked another way - what discount can one factor in when buying a LH as opposed to a FH ? |
|
| There is no answer at this time. |
|
| Subject:
Re: Leasehold vs Freehold (UK property law)
From: owain-ga on 07 Dec 2004 14:25 PST |
An 'average' is pretty meaningless because some types of property, such as flats, are usually leasehold (or commonhold) and others (such as houses) are predominantly freehold, so there is no direct comparison. The value of a leasehold property varies according to the length of the lease (sometimes as long as 999 years, but often only 100 years). Critically you must pay the freeholder to extend your lease if the time left on it dwindles to a point that makes it difficult to sell (generally thought to be 60 years or less). http://msn.whatmortgageonline.co.uk/holding.htm Buying a leasehold property is often not much cheaper than buying a freehold. This may seem a bit bizarre seeing as you don't actually own anything - you pay out a huge single lump sum to take possession of the space within the building. OK, so you can renovate, redesign and refurbish (as long as it is within the terms of the lease), but if the lease were to expire tomorrow, you'd probably have to leave all the fixtures behind. The difference in market value between a freehold property and a leasehold property is slight Few people nowadays retain a lease until it expires and it's increasingly easy to extend the lease anyway. The cost of the lease reflects current property values and it's quite likely you will be able to buy a leasehold property and sell it a few years later at a profit, even though it has less time to run on the lease. http://www.themovechannel.com/howto/find/leasehold-costs.asp Please note that your question relates primarily to English law (not UK). Scotland has used a completely different (predominantly feudal) property law. Owain |
| Subject:
Re: Leasehold vs Freehold (UK property law)
From: geof-ga on 07 Dec 2004 15:19 PST |
Just one small point to add to owain's comprehensive commnent. As owain says, most flats (apartments) in England are leasehold, but there are some houses converted into flats, where the residents in the separate flats share the freehold. Building societies and banks can be reluctant to lend money to purchase such flats, because it is sometimes unclear from the Deeds just who has responsibility for maintaining and repairing the exterior and common parts of the house. Such a freehold flat can therefore be worth less than an equivalent flat with a regular lease. |
| Subject:
Re: Leasehold vs Freehold (UK property law)
From: frde-ga on 08 Dec 2004 11:52 PST |
It is unlikely that a flat or apartment would be totally 'freehold' - unlikely - but not impossible - however very, very, unlikely Assuming you are interested in freestanding properties, then the price differential depends on the length of the lease and the covenants (which can be evil) Probably the easiest way of estimating it is the cash buyout sum that was introduced some years ago - which is compensation for loss of ground rent. That is pretty simple - GBP 1000 pa is worth 20,000 at 5% If you are looking at flats, then perhaps rephrase the question. |
If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by emailing us at answers-support@google.com with the question ID listed above. Thank you. |
| Search Google Answers for |
| Google Home - Answers FAQ - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy |