Google Answers Logo
View Question
 
Q: litigation privilege ( No Answer,   0 Comments )
Question  
Subject: litigation privilege
Category: Miscellaneous
Asked by: sewey-ga
List Price: $50.00
Posted: 31 Jan 2006 22:18 PST
Expires: 02 Mar 2006 22:18 PST
Question ID: 439948
california case law on loss of litigation privilege by attorney where
extortion was done, attorneys sued for extortion.

Request for Question Clarification by hagan-ga on 01 Feb 2006 07:57 PST
Hello again, Sewey.
There are no reported California cases in which an attorney being sued
for extortion unsuccessfully raised the litigation privilege as a
defense.

However, there ARE cases discussing the applicability of the
California litigation privilege to a civil RICO action brought in
Federal court.  Would those suffice as an answer to your question?

Clarification of Question by sewey-ga on 02 Feb 2006 12:47 PST
No. Silberg v Anderson (1990) 50 Cal 3d ruled that 1.communication
must be made in judicial proceedings 2.by litigant or attorney 3. to
acheive purpose of litigation 4. that has some reasonable or logical
connection to the action; Civil code 47.     Stuff like that.
Answer  
There is no answer at this time.

Comments  
There are no comments at this time.

Important Disclaimer: Answers and comments provided on Google Answers are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Google does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. Please read carefully the Google Answers Terms of Service.

If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by emailing us at answers-support@google.com with the question ID listed above. Thank you.
Search Google Answers for
Google Answers  


Google Home - Answers FAQ - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy