|
|
Subject:
Second-hand smoke
Category: Health > Conditions and Diseases Asked by: motojoe-ga List Price: $5.00 |
Posted:
11 Dec 2004 17:41 PST
Expires: 10 Jan 2005 17:41 PST Question ID: 441433 |
Is second-hand smoke more harmful then smoking a cigarette? |
|
There is no answer at this time. |
|
Subject:
Re: Second-hand smoke
From: neilzero-ga on 15 Dec 2004 16:55 PST |
Such claims have been made, but it is counter intuitive, as the smoker is breathing about as much poluted air as the non-smoker sharing the room. Also the cigarette removes some of the harmful ingrediants when the smoker sucks the smoke into in, and the lungs of the smoker remove more harmful ingrediants as the smoker exhails. My tentative conclusion is second hand smoke is at least slightly less harmful than smooking. Neil |
If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by emailing us at answers-support@google.com with the question ID listed above. Thank you. |
Search Google Answers for |
Google Home - Answers FAQ - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy |