|
|
Subject:
Employee relations--burden of proof--disputes--CA--US
Category: Business and Money > Employment Asked by: laborquestionee-ga List Price: $20.00 |
Posted:
07 Feb 2006 16:47 PST
Expires: 09 Mar 2006 16:47 PST Question ID: 442851 |
I am trying to locate a California law/code/statute, or US Federal law/code/statue that specifically states that the burden of proof is on the accuser (not the accused) re: negative comments in an annual review. I would like the specific name/reference number for the law/code/statute. A reference to the Federal law/code/statute alone would be fine. References to both Federal and California state law/code/statute would be better. I understand that a response from Google Answers is not legal advice. I have looked at: http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/, http://www.dol.gov/, and http://www.findlaw.com/, but without any luck. | |
|
|
There is no answer at this time. |
|
Subject:
Re: Employee relations--burden of proof--disputes--CA--US
From: vballguy-ga on 08 Feb 2006 07:40 PST |
Burden of proof is a term to describe the obligation for a party to support a claim. In a criminal case the burden is typically described as "Beyond a reasonable doubt" In a civil cases, it is typically described as the "preponderance of the evidence" - meaning that that one side must be more likely than the other. There is a third description of burden of proof called: "CLEAR AND CONVINCING EVIDENCE" "Clear and convincing establishes a standard of proof falling somewhere between the traditional standards of "preponderance of the evidence" and "beyond a reasonable doubt." With that said, Burden of proof only reflects on the process for legal cases. A performance review does not have a legal process... There is no legally binding obligation in a performcance review... resources: http://www.uslegalforms.com/lawdigest/legaldefinitions.php/burden_of_proof.htm http://www.judiciary.state.nj.us/civil/charges/119.htm |
Subject:
Re: Employee relations--burden of proof--disputes--CA--US
From: joe916-ga on 09 Feb 2006 14:04 PST |
It is my opinion that performance reviews are just opinions. Review your review with an open and honest mind. Talk with you coworkers and get their opinions and if you still disagree with it you could go to the reviewers reviewer and complain. You could also write a letter of response and have it placed in your personnel file. Also talk with you HR department. |
Subject:
Re: Employee relations--burden of proof--disputes--CA--US
From: joe916-ga on 18 Feb 2006 06:33 PST |
What do your coworkers say? Union? If your coworkers agree with you, they may be willing to write reviews for you, and you could place them with your letter of response in your personnel file. I couldn't recommend doing more than that. At least it will show you contested it. It shouldn't cause too many ripples in the water. You could also try to have HR change their reviewing process. Some companies have the employee write their own and management responds, some have coworkers do it, some have none at all. (my last 3 had none). It could be discriminatory, but I wouldn't go there without a pattern being established (age, gender, disability, race etc...) |
Subject:
Re: Employee relations--burden of proof--disputes--CA--US
From: laborquestionee-ga on 21 Feb 2006 21:03 PST |
That's a good suggestion, to have my coworkers write letters of support. I have been able, albeit slowly, to work this somewhat through the channels. But it is a slow and draining process. Thanks for the advice. |
If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by emailing us at answers-support@google.com with the question ID listed above. Thank you. |
Search Google Answers for |
Google Home - Answers FAQ - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy |