![]() |
|
![]() | ||
|
Subject:
monitoring e-mail and employee computer usage for business protection
Category: Computers > Internet Asked by: jyherold-ga List Price: $5.00 |
Posted:
07 Feb 2006 18:51 PST
Expires: 09 Mar 2006 18:51 PST Question ID: 442909 |
Is it ethical to monitoring e-mail and employee computer usage for business protection? |
![]() | ||
|
There is no answer at this time. |
![]() | ||
|
Subject:
Re: monitoring e-mail and employee computer usage for business protection
From: canadianhelper-ga on 07 Feb 2006 19:09 PST |
What is "ethical"? I would say that any employee should have the expectation that the above is being done.... If you want to be on the safe side of 'ethical', make sure each employee reads and signs this policy as part of an overall employee ethics guide (such as I sign every year at the bank I work for). I would question you back...as a business owner who has people relying on your performance in the business world to put food on the table (either private investors or stock holders) is it 'ethical' for you NOT to monitor how your company's resources are being used? Do you let your employees write personal letters on company letterhead? Do you let employees read books or watch TV while working? Here are some good articles on cyberslacking: http://www.businesscentre.bell.ca/KnowledgeBank/Internet/Articles/cyberslacking.htm http://www.bcentral.co.uk/newsletters/bulletins/cyberslacking.mspx http://www.aftab.com/workplace_privacy__cyberslackingmain.htm BTW: I hereby declare that I am responding to your question during my own private time at home and not on company time! |
Subject:
Re: monitoring e-mail and employee computer usage for business protection
From: emailnazi-ga on 08 Feb 2006 11:00 PST |
In fact, you really should be monitoring your employees email and computer usage. For example, recent court cases have proved that should one of your employees be engaging in illegal or unethical activities online, then you are at fault just as much as they are. Just make sure your Acceptable Use policy in your employee handbook says that all computer usage for for business/firm use only and that their computer activity and email can and will be monitored for any reason. |
Subject:
Re: monitoring e-mail and employee computer usage for business protection
From: snevey-ga on 18 Feb 2006 20:48 PST |
Yes, it is very ethical. I assist with this procedure at work, and we frequently terminate employees with personal email and/or internet browsing problems. We use a piece of software from GFI called MailEssentials. This archives ALL emails going out of and coming in of our company. We use a WebSense product to effectively monitor internet usage by time, bytes transferred, detination, category, etc. But, as other users have suggested, always make sure this information is clearly documented in your employee handbook. You should always have an acceptable use policy, or at least just a usage policy. If you don't, that would be similar to getting pulled over on a road with no posted speed limit for speeding. Steve |
Subject:
Re: monitoring e-mail and employee computer usage for business protection
From: grthumongous-ga on 20 Feb 2006 23:18 PST |
I will provide an alternate perspective for your consideration so that you may incorporate more information into your decision. You definitely should have a written policy--no argument there. The policy should be realistic. Do you really intend to fire someone for checking Olympic sporting results on their lunch? Do you intend to enforce the policy consistently, constantly, and predictably? Does the policy apply to everyone equally, regardless of level, including yours? In a recent case an airline chief was targeted by the board either because he breached his own policy or (arguably) could be *perceived* as breaching it. The software that does this checking and reporting is marketed to accentuate the "lost" productivity and exaggerates the prevalence of cyberslacking. Consumer versions tell you to catch that cheating spouse---see what they are up to! Treating staff as inanimate objects may foster a sense of mistrust from owner to management to line worker which echoes back as passive work-to-rule. For example, if a person cannot check the g**gle news or pay a bill online then they might just leave at precisely the end of the shift with no flexibility. In contrast, if they check their lottery ticket, peak at the sports, pay a bill and then work their butt off how have you "lost". This is calculus, not arithmetic. In 1906 seamstresses in some sweatshops had to work uninterrupted without breaks or diversions. Finally, a bunch of attorneys on a "PD-day" were listening to some la_di_dah lie-yer advocate this type of monitoring for their corporate clients as a response to this great emerging threat. Your clients will be sued! he cried. Tell them. Scare them. Convince them. As a fly on the wall I wanted to ask them how many of *them* have this on *their* office desktop and laptop computers. |
If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by emailing us at answers-support@google.com with the question ID listed above. Thank you. |
Search Google Answers for |
Google Home - Answers FAQ - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy |