|
|
Subject:
Statistics on Group Prayer
Category: Relationships and Society > Religion Asked by: thepeachcoach-ga List Price: $19.50 |
Posted:
08 Feb 2006 16:39 PST
Expires: 10 Mar 2006 16:39 PST Question ID: 443338 |
Is there any statistics on the how the power of prayer increases when it is done together in a group? Is there scientific evidence of the results of group prayer? | |
| |
| |
| |
|
|
There is no answer at this time. |
|
Subject:
Re: Statistics on Group Prayer
From: pugwashjw65-ga on 09 Feb 2006 00:36 PST |
PRAYER Worshipful address to the true God, or to false gods. Mere speech to God is not necessarily prayer, as is seen in the judgment in Eden and in the case of Cain. (Ge 3:8-13; 4:9-14) Prayer involves devotion, trust, respect, and a sense of dependence on the one to whom the prayer is directed. The various Hebrew and Greek words relating to prayer convey such ideas as to ask, make request, petition, entreat, supplicate, plead, beseech, beg, implore favor, seek, inquire of, as well as to praise, thank, and bless. Petitions and supplications, of course, can be made to men, and the original-language words are sometimes so used (Ge 44:18; 50:17; Ac 25:11), but ?prayer,? used in a religious sense, does not apply to such cases. One might ?beseech? or ?implore? another person to do something, but in so doing he would not view this individual as his God. He would not, for example, silently petition such one, nor do so when the individual was not visibly present, as one does in prayer to God. The ?Hearer of Prayer.? The entire Scriptural record testifies that Jehovah is the One to whom prayer should be directed (Ps 5:1, 2; Mt 6:9), that he is the ?Hearer of prayer? (Ps 65:2; 66:19) and has power to act in behalf of the petitioners. (Mr 11:24; Eph 3:20) To pray to false gods and their idol images is exposed as stupidity, for the idols do not have the ability either to hear or to act, and the gods they represent are unworthy of comparison with the true God. (Jg 10:11-16; Ps 115:4, 6; Isa 45:20; 46:1, 2, 6, 7) The contest concerning godship between Baal and Jehovah, held on Mount Carmel, demonstrated the foolishness of prayer to false deities.?1Ki 18:21-39; compare Jg 6:28-32. Though some claim that prayer may properly be addressed to others, such as to God?s Son, the evidence is emphatically to the contrary. True, there are rare instances in which words are addressed to Jesus Christ in heaven. Stephen, when about to die, appealed to Jesus, saying, ?Lord Jesus, receive my spirit.? (Ac 7:59) However, the context reveals a circumstance giving basis for this exceptional expression. Stephen at that very time had a vision of ?Jesus standing at God?s right hand,? and evidently reacting as if he were in Jesus? personal presence, he felt free to speak this plea to the one whom he recognized as the head of the Christian congregation. (Ac 7:55, 56; Col 1:18) Similarly, the apostle John, at the conclusion of the Revelation, says, ?Amen! Come, Lord Jesus.? (Re 22:20) But again the context shows that, in a vision (Re 1:10; 4:1, 2), John had been hearing Jesus speak of his future coming and thus John responded with the above expression of his desire for that coming. (Re 22:16, 20) In both cases, that of Stephen and that of John, the situation differs little from that of the conversation John had with a heavenly person in this Revelation vision. (Re 7:13, 14; compare Ac 22:6-22.) There is nothing to indicate that Christian disciples so expressed themselves under other circumstances to Jesus after his ascension to heaven. Thus, the apostle Paul writes: ?In everything by prayer and supplication along with thanksgiving let your petitions be made known to God.??Php 4:6. The article APPROACH TO GOD considers the position of Christ Jesus as the one through whom prayer is directed. Through Jesus? blood, offered to God in sacrifice, ?we have boldness for the way of entry into the holy place,? that is, boldness to approach God?s presence in prayer, approaching ?with true hearts in the full assurance of faith.? (Heb 10:19-22) Jesus Christ is therefore the one and only ?way? of reconciliation with God and approach to God in prayer.?Joh 14:6; 15:16; 16:23, 24; 1Co 1:2; Eph 2:18; see JESUS CHRIST (His Vital Place in God?s Purpose). Those Whom God Hears. People ?of all flesh? may come to the ?Hearer of prayer,? Jehovah God. (Ps 65:2; Ac 15:17) Even during the period that Israel was God?s ?private property,? his covenant people, foreigners could approach Jehovah in prayer by recognizing Israel as God?s appointed instrument and the temple at Jerusalem as his chosen place for sacrifice. (De 9:29; 2Ch 6:32, 33; compare Isa 19:22.) Later, by Christ?s death, the distinction between Jew and Gentile was forever removed. (Eph 2:11-16) At the home of the Italian Cornelius, Peter recognized that ?God is not partial, but in every nation the man that fears him and works righteousness is acceptable to him.? (Ac 10:34, 35) The determining factor, then, is the heart of the individual and what his heart is moving him to do. (Ps 119:145; La 3:41) Those who observe God?s commandments and do ?the things that are pleasing in his eyes? have the assurance that his ?ears? are also open to them.?1Jo 3:22; Ps 10:17; Pr 15:8; 1Pe 3:12. Conversely, those who disregard God?s Word and law, shedding blood and practicing other wickedness, do not receive a favorable hearing from God; their prayers are ?detestable? to him. (Pr 15:29; 28:9; Isa 1:15; Mic 3:4) The very prayer of such ones can ?become a sin.? (Ps 109:3-7) King Saul, by his presumptuous, rebellious course, lost God?s favor, and ?although Saul would inquire of Jehovah, Jehovah never answered him, either by dreams or by the Urim or by the prophets.? (1Sa 28:6) Jesus said that hypocritical persons who sought to draw attention to their piety by praying received their ?reward in full??from men, but not from God. (Mt 6:5) The pious-appearing Pharisees made long prayers, boasted of their superior morality, yet were condemned by God for their hypocritical course. (Mr 12:40; Lu 18:10-14) Though they drew near with their mouths, their hearts were far from God and his Word of truth.?Mt 15:3-9; compare Isa 58:1-9. The individual must have faith in God and in his being ?the rewarder of those earnestly seeking him? (Heb 11:6), approaching in ?the full assurance of faith.? (Heb 10:22, 38, 39) Recognition of one?s own sinful state is essential, and when serious sins have been committed, the individual must ?soften the face of Jehovah? (1Sa 13:12; Da 9:13) by first softening his own heart in sincere repentance, humility, and contrition. (2Ch 34:26-28; Ps 51:16, 17; 119:58) Then God may let himself be entreated and may grant forgiveness and a favorable hearing (2Ki 13:4; 2Ch 7:13, 14; 33:10-13; Jas 4:8-10); no longer will one feel that God has ?blocked approach to himself with a cloud mass, that prayer may not pass through.? (La 3:40-44) Though a person may not be cut off completely from receiving audience with God, his prayers can be ?hindered? if he fails to follow God?s counsel. (1Pe 3:7) Those seeking forgiveness must be forgiving toward others.?Mt 6:14, 15; Mr 11:25; Lu 11:4. |
Subject:
Re: Statistics on Group Prayer
From: thepeachcoach-ga on 09 Feb 2006 08:40 PST |
This section that contains bible references is NOT what I'm looking for. I can not use any of that information. I'm looking for a statement that I can use in today's world that supports group prayer. For example, Participants in this prayer group saw a 15% increase in their peace and life satisfaction levels by having participated in the group. thank you |
Subject:
Re: Statistics on Group Prayer
From: slakemoth-ga on 09 Feb 2006 11:27 PST |
thepeach, As much as the faithful would like to believe, there is zero evidence to support any kind of "power of prayer". The studies you are hearing about are bogus and not scientific in any way. I will refer you to a few articles on this subject. It is also important to realize that the film "what the bleep" is pretty much a "load of bleep"... most of the scientists quoted in the film haev come out against the film saying their statements were taken out of context and they were edited to make it appear they were support "woo" ( as James Randi likes to say). I would not give any credibility to anything presented in that film without serious further research... ( which is really what you are doing now). anyway here are some links to read. Straight Dope: "Have studies shown that prayer can help cure the sick?" http://www.straightdope.com/mailbag/msciprayer.html Several articles from James Randi's website--- "That Healing Prayer Brouhaha" A heavy discussion has being going on for weeks now about a study that appeared to validate the power-of-prayer notion that has been under question for so many decades. I've declined to address the current exposure of the farce until it was definitively settled; that time has arrived. http://www.randi.org/jr/070904that.html Columbia University scandal - ""Does Prayer Influence the Success of in Vitro fertilization?" http://www.randi.org/jr/121704no.html follow up "That Prayer Study" http://www.randi.org/jr/123104my.html WHY AREN'T FRAUD AND/OR INCOMPETENCY LOOKED UPON AS REAL POSSIBILITIES IN SCIENTIFIC PROCEDURES? "In the January/February 2000 issue of The Humanist, the journal of the American Humanist association, author David Shafer, Ph.D., discusses scientific investigations of the claim that intercessory prayer can affect cardiac patients who are not even aware that they are being prayed for, bringing about alleviation of pain and faster recovery times. If it were true, it would certainly be a paranormal event....." http://www.randi.org/jr/01-13-2000.html "Follow-Up Study on Prayer Therapy May Help Refute False and Misleading Information About Earlier Clinical Trial" http://www.skeptic.com/eskeptic/archives/2005/05-09-02.html There are lots more, but I think you get the drift... In the end, if a person believes strongly enough that they are being "prayed" for it seems to help their attitude ( if they are strongly faithful), but its all a placebo effect... |
Subject:
Re: Statistics on Group Prayer
From: thepeachcoach-ga on 09 Feb 2006 13:01 PST |
slakemoth-ga, Do you work for Goggle or are you just sharing your opinion/research? I'm new to "Goggle answers" so I am not sure if the two comments added are considered research from "Goggle Answers" or are they other "goggle answer" members sharing their knowledge. either care, thank you for the information. |
Subject:
Re: Statistics on Group Prayer
From: bobbie7-ga on 09 Feb 2006 13:08 PST |
Thepeachcoach, You can identify an official Google Answers Researcher by the blue colored link in their nickname. The two comments were not posted by official Google Answers Researchers. pugwashjw65-ga and slakemoth-ga are commenters. I hope this helps |
Subject:
Re: Statistics on Group Prayer
From: daniel2d-ga on 10 Feb 2006 01:22 PST |
There has never been any scientific evidence that prayer effects the outcome of anything in the context you are talking about. And there would never be anyway to verify that, if something did happen, that the prayer was the reason for it. All in all prayers only effect is those doing the praying. |
Subject:
Re: Statistics on Group Prayer
From: slakemoth-ga on 10 Feb 2006 09:29 PST |
Thepeachcoach, As pointed out I am not a Google Answers Researcher, just a knucklehead with intenet access..... |
Subject:
Re: Statistics on Group Prayer
From: myoarin-ga on 10 Feb 2006 16:45 PST |
Commenters are sometimes not so circumspect as Researchers, especially when offering opinion or interpretation, which doesn't necessarily denigrate the comment. But apparently the question is not about prayers of intercession for health problems but rather about group prayer, per se, worshipping together. Personally, I have no doubt that persons who choose to pray together feel better for it, strengthened in their moral beliefs by experiencing that they are not alone in them. As the prayer of St. Chrysostom (4th c.) puts it: "When two or three are gathered together in Thy name, Thou wilt grant them their request." But that is no answer to your question about statistics. Regards, Myoarin |
Subject:
Re: Statistics on Group Prayer
From: eivann-ga on 12 Feb 2006 12:43 PST |
I have read articles in the past (I think [but memory is hazy] in New Scientist and by a lecturer in positive psychology [at Cambridge, I fuzzily remember] who used to write a column in the times)that research seemed to show people who espose a siritual belief system (not necessarily a religion)tend to live longer than those who don't. and those who participate in group worship regulary tended to live longer still. whether this was due to the worhip, prayer, etc., or down to the moral support and social interaction, they could not say. There are also fringe benefits in that religiosity seems to bolster marriage and folks in strong marriages tend to last a bit longer too. 'A 2004 study of older adults in the journal Health Psychology found that those who attended religious services more than once weekly had lower mortality and elevated levels of interleukin-6 -- a substance produced by the body that can improve response to infection and disease'. http://www.supercentenarian.com/archive/compress.html A possible article along these lines is on http://www.hqlo.com/content/3/1/53 - Engagement of patients in religious and spiritual practices: Confirmatory results with the SpREUK-P 1.1 questionnaire as a tool of quality of life research At the risk of sounding facetious, I googled: positive psychology religion study longevity Googling positive psychology religion study prayer, there seemed interesting links like http://www.stnews.org/Commentary-2402.htm and http://www.religioustolerance.org/medical4.htm I claim no greater scientific understanding thatn being a fairly typically educated person who tends to go phases of reading too much. |
Subject:
Re: Statistics on Group Prayer
From: eivann-ga on 12 Feb 2006 12:50 PST |
http://www.psychologytoday.com/articles/pto-2191.html link to article on meditation - plenty more - googled positive psychology study meditation group benefits I think I've had too much coffee again |
Subject:
Re: Statistics on Group Prayer
From: pugwashjw65-ga on 14 Feb 2006 19:02 PST |
I truly fail to understand how prayer CAN be separated from the Bible and what the Bible has to say about it. Prayer is certainly NOT a secular subject. It is communication with God direct. A "secular" study of prayer seems to me to be an OXYMORON. Just a thought!. |
Subject:
Re: Statistics on Group Prayer
From: slakemoth-ga on 17 Feb 2006 08:55 PST |
I would agree with that statement to a degree. BUT the subject in question, as far as the context I'm looking at it through, asks a very real and scientific question. That being, is there any scientific concrete evidence for prayer to effect people? The question asked about evidence for prayer "power" to increase when done by a group. This suggests that there is something there to begin with, and that this "measurable effect" is increased when more people participate. This view takes prayer out of the realm of the personal and "faith" aspect and pulls it into the realm of science, i.e. testable results. We cannot look at what people think of prayer as it relates to themselves..i.e. I "feel" better... We have to look at "blind test" situations, or measurable results, and in that realm prayer offers no evidence of success. I have no interest in interfering with someone's faith, and their personal realtionship with God, BUT the moment people begin to tell people "do not go for treatment, we can cure your ailment by prayer"... well now we have a problem. I would ask that before medical treatment is exchanged for the "power of prayer" ..that "prayer" offer scientific credible evidence that disease can be cured by prayer... To date there have been zero credible studies done that show prayer to be anything other than a personal experience / realtionship with a God.... |
Subject:
Re: Statistics on Group Prayer
From: pugwashjw65-ga on 20 Feb 2006 22:52 PST |
In response to Slakemoth. An honest Christian will always pray to God for help, regardless of the problem. But to replace commonsense treatment for a medical problem, via a medical professional, with singular or group prayer, is really "putting God to the test". It is like saying " Here is my problem, God, please do something about it because IF YOU DON'T, my little Timmy will die. I could save him myself if we saw a doctor, but I am not going to take THAT option. I am going to load it ALL onto you". This approach lacks HUMBLENESS. 1 CORINTHIANS 10; . 9 Neither let us put Jehovah to the test, as some of them put [him] to the test, only to perish by the serpents. A " group" prayer would have the same effect as a singlular prayer. One person, on behalf of the others says the words, and they respond in agreement by the word ' Amen', meaning, we agree. God would regard this as the same prayer coming from each individual. |
Subject:
Re: Statistics on Group Prayer
From: slakemoth-ga on 21 Feb 2006 09:50 PST |
I have no problem with your theological interpretation..... I would ask how you view the initial question, i.e. what is thepeachcoach asking? |
If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by emailing us at answers-support@google.com with the question ID listed above. Thank you. |
Search Google Answers for |
Google Home - Answers FAQ - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy |