![]() |
|
![]() | ||
|
Subject:
Computer network
Category: Computers Asked by: goldsea-ga List Price: $20.00 |
Posted:
16 Dec 2004 20:24 PST
Expires: 18 Dec 2004 10:37 PST Question ID: 443746 |
![]() | ||
|
There is no answer at this time. |
![]() | ||
|
Subject:
Re: Computer network
From: racerx17-ga on 17 Dec 2004 00:49 PST |
The answer is very simple, you don't even need ip addresses or a network layer in this case. Just connect all your computers together with a switch or switches. Ok, your applications may expect a network layer, but still you can just assign these 300 IP addresses and all will work OK. That is, unless some application or transport protocol wrongly expects a subnet mask to be assigned. It is also likely you want to connect to the internet. In that case you will need a router and the use of NAT. With a router in the network you have to have a subnet mask that will work (e.g. 255.255.254.0). This allows 512 hosts within your LAN. regards, racerx p.s. I got the feeling this question might be from your homework for some University computer science course. In that case, my answering it would be unethical. |
Subject:
Re: Computer network
From: alex2000-ga on 17 Dec 2004 04:54 PST |
First, use what is called a class B addressing scheme. Your subnet mask on the computers will be 255.255.0.0 This means that the first two numbers are the network, and the second two groups are the host ip addresses. So, all of the computers on the network will have an ip address that starts with 10.0. , then after that, it can be anything unique, up to 254. So, for example, if you had 300 computers, you could assign 254 of them 10.0.0.1 - 10.0.0.254, and then you could assign the next 254 10.0.1.1 - 10.0.1.254. Because you have assigned a subnet mask of 255.255.0.0, you can use 10.0.1.x - 10.0.254.x, which is 64,000+ ip addresses. Plug them all into the switches, which should be plugged into each other (probably via crossover cables), and you have a network. |
Subject:
Re: Computer network
From: crythias-ga on 17 Dec 2004 06:30 PST |
I'd rather go with 255.255.254.0 subnet or 255.255.252.0 ... at least it can let me have a finer level of control to subnet the network. the 254.0 gives 512-2=510 available IP addresses, btw. You can't use zero, and the highest IP should be used for broadcast address. If you have 300 computers in use, 510 available may or may not be enough. If you were running closer to 500, I'd suggest the 255.255.252.0 which gives 1024-2 available addresses. A class B 255.255.0.0 subnet is very much overkill, but is likely the only valid answer given in a multiple choice test. |
Subject:
Re: Computer network
From: timapril-ga on 17 Dec 2004 08:23 PST |
Rather than using the 255.255.255.0 subnet mask just use 255.255.0.0 subnet mask on the machines in the network, that will allow your network to grow to 65000 or so computers without needing to use a router. At that number of computers though you are going run into issues of packet storms unles you are using switches (switches are much better than hubs). Good Luck |
If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by emailing us at answers-support@google.com with the question ID listed above. Thank you. |
Search Google Answers for |
Google Home - Answers FAQ - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy |