Where can I find someone knowledgeable in theoretical computer science
willing to provide kind but detailed criticism of some proofs I've come up
with? The subject of my proofs is by and large pretty elementary:
finite-state machines, finite-state machine minimization, and Turing
Machines.
I don't want to post the specific proofs here-- it would be pretty embarassing
if they were wrong. If my proofs have fixable problems, I'd like to be able
to send revisions back for more criticism (which wouldn't be very often;
it could take weeks for me to come up with a revision). Is it permissible to
pay for each round of criticism, assuming no laws or regulations are broken
by doing so?
I'm definitely not a student: I've been out of school more than ten years.
So they're not homework problems.
As for the qualifications of the person I'm looking for, I'd like someone
who has published at least one paper in theoretical computer science and
who has a PhD or has at least passed their PhD qualifying examinations.
Finally, an answer as simple as "write to the theorist at your local
university" won't do. A satisfactory answer must direct me to someone
who will actually respond in detail. |
Request for Question Clarification by
mathtalk-ga
on
20 Dec 2004 10:22 PST
Hi, anova12-ga:
I'd be interested in helping with your project, but unfortunately the
Google Answers Terms of Service are quite clear in forbidding "out of
band" communications between Customers and Researchers.
Therefore my thought would be to "broker" a relationship between you
and someone interested in your project at a university or similar
institution, assuming you'd be open to that. You seem to be happy
with the prospect of a critique by email approach, so I imagine that
with a bit more information about the subject of your proofs, a
suitable match can be found.
regards, mathtalk-ga
|
Clarification of Question by
anova12-ga
on
20 Dec 2004 15:16 PST
Yes, I am open to brokered relationships as you describe them
as long as they don't conflict with laws or regulations.
As for the possibility of working with you, you may want to check
how long we are forbidden from working. Usually there's some sort
of time bound on these sorts of things.
So for the short term, yes, I will consider the question answered
if you can broker a relationship with someone who will provide
specific critiques and who meets the qualifications in the original
question. But in the long term, if regulations allow it,
I'd also be open to working with you.
|
Request for Question Clarification by
mathtalk-ga
on
20 Dec 2004 18:03 PST
Hi, anova12-ga:
You describe the proofs you'd like a detailed criticism of as being
"elementary" and in the subject of theoretical computer science,
touching on finite-state automata and Turing machines in particular.
What level of study would best describe the questions you deal with?
Undergraduate? Graduate? Research level?
regards, mathtalk-ga
|
Clarification of Question by
anova12-ga
on
21 Dec 2004 23:15 PST
The questions are at a research level, because they are attempting
to break some new ground. But the language used to ask them isn't
beyond the first-semester graduate level theory course, where my
training in theory largely ended.
|