Google Answers Logo
View Question
 
Q: Calculating the cost of absenteeism in the Canadian workplace ( No Answer,   0 Comments )
Question  
Subject: Calculating the cost of absenteeism in the Canadian workplace
Category: Business and Money
Asked by: bubbafett-ga
List Price: $40.00
Posted: 21 Dec 2004 15:34 PST
Expires: 20 Jan 2005 15:34 PST
Question ID: 445734
I'm looking for formulas used by industry experts--and more
importantly, the supporting documentation for the formulas--to
calculate the cost of absenteeism to a typical Canadian business.

Some would argue that there is no real impact on the business until
you have to hire additional resources to cover for the employee
(overtime, temp employees, etc.).  They say that, in short,
absenteeism, has no measurable financial impact on a business unless
replacement resources are deployed.

The other extreme is taking the all-in wages and benefits for that
employee and multiplying that figure by a number representing the
additional admin, medical and HR costs the organization incurs because
of the absence.  They do this to take into consideration the
infrastructure required for managing absenteeism.

From a purely EBIT (Earnings Before Interest and Taxes) perspective,
the first point of view seems accurate.  Common sense, however, would
indicate that when you pay an employee to stay home (even if you
aren't hiring replacement employees for the day), you're losing money.

So what is the accepted Canadian industry standard calculation?  If
there are no accepted standards, are there at least four (4)
well-substantiated calculations used by professionals?  Do any of
these professional groups have an interest in artificially increasing
(or decreasing) the cost measurement?

Details:
Formulas should help me come up with a cost per employee/day, likely
taking into account wages, benefits and other costs I can slot in.
I would like at least 4 formulas, with documentation supporting each
one.  If multiple organizations use the same formula, that?s fine.
I would prefer that at least 2 of the formulas reference Canadian material.
I?m using this to support an ROI surrounding an investment targeted at
a reduction in absenteeism.
Answer  
There is no answer at this time.

Comments  
There are no comments at this time.

Important Disclaimer: Answers and comments provided on Google Answers are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Google does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. Please read carefully the Google Answers Terms of Service.

If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by emailing us at answers-support@google.com with the question ID listed above. Thank you.
Search Google Answers for
Google Answers  


Google Home - Answers FAQ - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy