The other day I watched a show called "House" that made a strong argument for me 1)
never to touch pork again, and 2) that I should be checked for worms throughout
my body and especially giving me a head-start on Alzheimer's, that
only x-rays can find and that two blue pills can cure. I'm now in the
habit of avoiding the channel that has "House" on it, but happened to
run into a homeless person who offered for no reason but perhaps that I was
telepathically broadcasting (some sort of vestigial backup system when
infested with worms) my fear of them, that tobacco is supposed
to be an antihelmintic. TV chases people toward doctors, drug
companies and mortgages, that's its job and has been since before
geritol and sominex, but if you can track down whether there is a
tradition of tobacco being a reasonable treatment for this, I'd
be spared a prescription of prozac and elevil. I'm not that terrified
of worms, actually, but I kind of resent a show doing this. I'm part
indian and couldn't be made to inhale with an
iron lung, but I figure anyone could buy a tin of chaw and have a
pinch or two for dessert. |
Clarification of Question by
scotttygett-ga
on
22 Dec 2004 13:38 PST
It was the one with the elementary school teacher who drops one day
and gets irradiated and hormoned and all kinds of other stuff since
they don't figure she's got a worm in her brain at first. I don't
recall a Santa.
I wouldn't be surprised if there's a Lancet or something circa 1900
saying what and how much, or maybe some journal saying that penicillin
doesn't affect worms, so keep giving tobacco or mercury, or whatever
it was they did back then.
(I think that if they're going to have something like this in a
"House" episode with animated CG worms, they should have at least an
offscreen line about something stupid like tobacco, just like mention
of "Charcoal" now and then for ridiculous Hollywood poisonings might
be in line.)
So, I hope that helps?
|
Clarification of Question by
scotttygett-ga
on
22 Dec 2004 18:02 PST
Tutuzdad's comment that the question was poorly put prompts me to go
for something slightly different in the question. I'm not sure exactly
what that is because Crabcakes has warned that certain parasites will
respond to my tobacco chewing by going straight to my INSERT YOUR
FAVORITE ORGAN HERE. Are the parasites that do this found in
trichinella? I'm definitely leaning towards prophylactic botanicals,
so I could be doomed with a cup of hot chocolate by that logic. I was
hoping for something common like tobacco, saltpeter or, hmmm? I've
heard of do-it-yourself pesticide using tobacco spit, so I know it's
got kick. I can't think of anything comparable. Tabasco? Curry powder?
Won't those just make the worms angry? There should be some AMA blurb
that says THESE BOTANICALS ARE ACCEPTABLE PROPHYLACTIC ANTIHELMINTICS
FOR YOUR PATIENTS THAT DON'T LIKE THE DRUGS THE GRAYS GAVE US BUT
WOULD EAT A KILO OF MUSTARD IF IT WERE ON A BUMPER STICKER...
|
Clarification of Question by
scotttygett-ga
on
23 Dec 2004 11:01 PST
Lawyers do this thing where they scare folks into $11,000 living
trusts, and it's pathetic that this could be the case with MD's. I'm
not enjoying the argument, in case my many clarifications give this
appearance, and I'll tip for something sensible. Monkey botanical
treatments, AMA-like guidelines from before 1940 that allow
botanicals, court case documents that lean in the direction, even
holistic care for animals, if it leans in the direction of monkeys as
well as cows. Good effort. I think we're close, whether or not this
could be used in a TV re-edit or to help the third world.
|