![]() |
|
![]() | ||
|
Subject:
3/4 GB ->1.5GB DDR upgrade. A WASTE? Y/N/Why? [Win XP Prof / Office]
Category: Computers Asked by: rfh-ga List Price: $5.00 |
Posted:
05 Jan 2005 07:45 PST
Expires: 04 Feb 2005 07:45 PST Question ID: 452348 |
![]() | ||
|
There is no answer at this time. |
![]() | ||
|
Subject:
Re: 3/4 GB ->1.5GB DDR upgrade. A WASTE? Y/N/Why? [Win XP Prof / Office]
From: david1977-ga on 05 Jan 2005 14:37 PST |
I will try to answer your question the best I can through my own personall knowledge. To run windows xp you need at least 256 where as some come standered with only 128 which is insufficient if you want to run anything besides what comes with windows. Now for office work and multimedia you should have at least 512 if you multitask alot. As it will get drained fairly quickly. And you dont really want your computer using virtual memory as it runs slower and has a bad habit of crashing. Now if you are into high end games i would suggest 1 gig as you can always use the extra memory. I say this becuse of everything you will be running sucks up the memory. And you will get memory leaks after running some application which means that even though the program is closed it will still consume some memory. Not to mention if you are connected to the internet you will need a firewall and a antivirus constently running. As you stated you said you are into modeling which I will assume would be something like Maya or even poser than you must have at least 512 If you are working on more than one project at a time or working between multiple programs to create the design, effect, motion and everything else than I would say stick with the 1gig. Easist way for you to tell is turn everything on that you useually use on your computer in a setting. After you have all of the programs you have up and have been working on something crtl+alt+delete and see how much memory you are using at the time. And go from there. |
Subject:
Re: 3/4 GB ->1.5GB DDR upgrade. A WASTE? Y/N/Why? [Win XP Prof / Office]
From: phossil-ga on 06 Jan 2005 12:23 PST |
This is a little above what most computer manufactures say is the minimum amount of Ram to have in your computer. I believe that you can never have to much RAM. Especially since RAM is one of the least expensive components in the computer why would you want to skimp on one of the most important performance enhancing pieces of hardware in the computer? Besides, you already got one. Just looking your number i realized your amount of free memory is bigger the half of the total capacity of the RAM module (875M FREE) so you still have a lot of room for all your incoming apps and no need to worry about that. If you are a gamer or are involved in multimedia this is just enough for all your necesities. I hope it helps. Phossil. |
Subject:
Re: 3/4 GB ->1.5GB DDR upgrade. A WASTE? Y/N/Why? [Win XP Prof / Office]
From: johnoconnor-ga on 06 Jan 2005 16:43 PST |
That much RAM is overkill in today's computers, however you also want to think about future applications you will be running on your laptop. Do you plan on doing any video, sound, or multimedia work? Even playing some games in the near future will require more RAM. Not to mention, if you want to use productivity software (such as the new Office). The more the better. Just because you don't use it now doesn't mean you will not want/need it later. It's better to get it now then to be without later. |
Subject:
Re: 3/4 GB ->1.5GB DDR upgrade. A WASTE? Y/N/Why? [Win XP Prof / Office]
From: shinerweb-ga on 13 Jan 2005 08:01 PST |
I would disgree completely with johnoconnor-ga and agree with phossil-ga. The more RAM you have, the less time the system has to spend swapping out memory to disk and back between applications. Some applications will use what you have for temporary buffering, so the more you have the better. Doing your normal work and not having to close this, close that etc is always a good thing. As someone said, memory is one of the cheapest components out there. Increasing your memory can be better than increasing CPU speed. Unless you one run application and only ever one application at a time, stick with it. (And you can't run one application if you have firewalls, anti-virus etc). Just for the gaming side alone it would be worth it. Games are known to make use of whatever they can when they run. (Caching of maps into memory, rather than disk access is a lot quicker). |
If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by emailing us at answers-support@google.com with the question ID listed above. Thank you. |
Search Google Answers for |
Google Home - Answers FAQ - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy |