Google Answers Logo
View Question
 
Q: Para gliding and normal gliding dangers ( No Answer,   3 Comments )
Question  
Subject: Para gliding and normal gliding dangers
Category: Sports and Recreation > Outdoors
Asked by: inshallah-ga
List Price: $5.00
Posted: 08 Jan 2005 08:42 PST
Expires: 07 Feb 2005 08:42 PST
Question ID: 454117
Before taking up either of the sports of gliding and para gliding I am
interested in the dangers of each - ie compared to driving, climbing,
skydiving etc. I guess answers including fatalitys and injurys per
1000s etc would be useful, as well as if it is more dangerous in some
countries than others and if recent developments have made it safer -
I am just interested to see if these sports are worth the risks.

thanks

Insh.
Answer  
There is no answer at this time.

Comments  
Subject: Re: Para gliding and normal gliding dangers
From: davidglover-ga on 07 Feb 2005 19:47 PST
 
About 1 out of a 1500 dies in the sport every year.  You can find out
more at ushga.org or ssa.org
Subject: Re: Para gliding and normal gliding dangers
From: freeflydan-ga on 16 Feb 2005 11:11 PST
 
I'm a semi-pro skydiver, and we frequently see stats comparing our
sport to other forms of aviation.  Many of those stats make skydiving
actually look safer than other forms of aviation, but you gotta take
that with a grain of salt when it's a skydiving publication.

see http://www.afn.org/skydive/sta/stats.html

=====================================================

FAI/IPC Techical and Safety Subcommittee Congress
Helsinki, Finland, October 1993
Global research on safety in parachuting 1991. Replies from 35
countries of 62 were received. 26 had exact counts, nine had only
estimated numbers.

Total of 245 162 jumpers made 4 848 025 jumps. 74 died, which makes 1
fatality per 65 513 jumps. Preliminary research gives ratio of 1:64
091 for year 1992.

Experienced jumpers (over 250 jumps), who cover 24% of all jumpers,
made half of all jumps, but were involved only in 35% of accidents.
Students cover 48% of all jumpers, but they made only 17% of jumps,
and were involved in 38% of accidents.

Human error was cause of 92% of fatalities. Approximately 75% of
victims would have been saved with AAD. RSL/Stevens system might have
saved 35%. If all jumpers would had used both AAD and RSL, amount of
victims might had decreased from 74 to 20.

In 75% of accidents reserve hasn't been used at all or it had been used too low. 

Swiss research on cut-away failure
Most cut-aways were done by those with 1-100 jumps experience, they
had made 0.23% of all jumps. People with over 1000 jumps had least
cut-aways, 0.1%. Also jumpers with competition experience had less
cut-aways. Half of jumpers who did cut-away felt stressed afterwards.
77% said the situation was what they had expected. Many were surprised
of spinning and g-powers under malfunctioning main. Most common, 70%,
reason for cut-away was packing failure. Probability for reserve use
was 1:500 in Switzerland.
Death ratio per 100 000 landings in: 

   charter flights      0.18
   general aviation     1.4
   soaring              1.6
   parachuting          1.4

============================================================

Taken from Dan Poynter's Parachuting: A Skydiver's Handbook 6th edition. 

1991 
121,900 people made 2,440,000 civilian jumps in the US.
25,000 active skydivers average approx. 100 to 125 jumps/year.
Approx. 97,000 students graduate the First Jump Course and make a jump each year.
Approx. 300,000 student jumps/year, 1.9 million experienced skydiver jumps/year. 
1987 
29 fatal parachuting accidents in the US.
Yielding a fatality rate of 1/75,000 jumps, or 1/3,800 participants. 
Comparisons 
Hang Gliding: 1/2,308 hang gliding flights.
Accidental Deaths: 1/2,582 (91,000 out of total US pop. of 235 million in 1983) 
In a recent year over 140 people died scuba diving, 856 bicycling,
over 7,000 drowned, 1154 died of bee stings, and 80 by lightning. In
1982, 43,990 people were killed in highway accidents, 1,171 boating
fatalities, 235 airline deaths, and 1,164 light aircraft general
aviation fatalities.
Student injuries run about 2%. So out of 90,000 students, 1,800 can
expect to be injured.

================================================

From the table printed on page 13 of the April 1990 issue of
Parachutist. Here is a comparison of the risks of participating in
various activities. It was put together by the U.S. Hang Gliding
Association using data collected from various air sports organizations
and melding it with data from the National Safety Council and other
sources.
  
 Activity         Participants      Fatalities  Rate per 100,000
                                      per year   participants
 All accidents       230,000,000       96,000   42
 Traffic  Fatalities 162,850,000       46,000   28
 Power Boat Racing         7,000          5     71
 SCUBA                   300,000        140     47
 Mountaineering           60,000         30     50
 Boxing                    6,000         3      50 
   
 AIR VEHICLES:
 Air Shows             1,000              5     500
 Homebuilt             8,000             25     312
 General Aviation    550,000            800     145
 Sailplane            20,000              9     45
 Balloon               4,500              3     67
 Hang Gliding         25,000             10     40
 SKYDIVING           110,000             28     25

It says the skydiving stats are for 1988, and it implies that the
other figures are for 1989.
You can also get fatality stats from just about any almanac or "fact book".

===============================================

I wouldn't mind seeing something more recent or perhaps performed by
an organization that doesn't have a vested interest in skydiving. 
That last stat from Parachutist comes out great for skydiving because
we have so many one time only participants (tandems).  So our fatality
per participant looks really low.  I think fatalities/injuries per
landing is a better stat to compare the relative safety of different
forms of aviation.

Dan
Subject: Re: Para gliding and normal gliding dangers
From: scooterpenrose-ga on 23 Mar 2005 15:20 PST
 
The best way to asses risk/dangers is to compare the number of
fatalaties with the number of launches. Checking by capita (done on
some sights I have seen) and done by number of participants (on yet
others) is not a fair way of comparing risk. One site goes on to say
that Golf is more dangerous thand Hand Gliding because more people die
per year in Golf accidents - but there are far more people doign Golf.

A reasonable assesment can be found at the British Gliding Association
- although they compare numbers over 20 years, and safety has actually
increased.

http://www.parliament.the-stationery-office.co.uk/pa/cm199899/cmselect/cmenvtra/275/275ap46.htm

I have no numbers like that for Hand Gliding or Para gliding.

Scott

Important Disclaimer: Answers and comments provided on Google Answers are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Google does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. Please read carefully the Google Answers Terms of Service.

If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by emailing us at answers-support@google.com with the question ID listed above. Thank you.
Search Google Answers for
Google Answers  


Google Home - Answers FAQ - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy