![]() |
|
![]() | ||
|
Subject:
19th century emergence of the Science Biology/Sex
Category: Science > Biology Asked by: wenpsych-ga List Price: $10.50 |
Posted:
13 Jan 2005 08:54 PST
Expires: 31 Jan 2005 09:03 PST Question ID: 456639 |
![]() | ||
|
There is no answer at this time. |
![]() | ||
|
Subject:
Re: 19th century emergence of the Science Biology/Sex
From: kriswrite-ga on 18 Jan 2005 08:02 PST |
For what it's worth: I collect sex ed and health books from the 19th century, and there is not one in my collection that refers to female anatomy as being inferior. Kriswrite |
Subject:
Re: 19th century emergence of the Science Biology/Sex
From: wenpsych-ga on 18 Jan 2005 09:04 PST |
No. My qiestion is in reference to the advent of biology in the 19th century ie Darwin, and Darwin like his predecessors, certainly reviewed Woman as the inferior speices! These are the references I was hoping to be directed toward. Not Aristotle, I have his volumes, but to the 19th century biology on Woman with specific focus on female genitalia/biology. |
Subject:
Re: 19th century emergence of the Science Biology/Sex
From: wenpsych-ga on 27 Jan 2005 07:09 PST |
well, there was no luck with that question. Maybe you can find me some "primary" excerpts in Charles Darwin's writings that deal specifically with female organs, genitalia etc.. in relation to their sexual inferiority. Thank you. |
If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by emailing us at answers-support@google.com with the question ID listed above. Thank you. |
Search Google Answers for |
Google Home - Answers FAQ - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy |